Calculus II Class 02/12


The picture below shows a marble being held in a track.

An end view shows how the marble extends about half a radius down into the groove of the track.

The figure below illustrates how we can determine how far down into the track the marble extends. 

Note that if the marble was cut horizontally at the level of the track, the cross-section of the cut would be a circle with radius .63 cm.

 

The figure below shows that if the marble was cut at height h above its lowest point the radius r of the cut would be the horizontal leg of a right triangle whose hypotenuse is .78 cm and whose other leg is .78 cm - h.

The graph done in class was labeled the same as the graph below but graph 'altitudes' were incorrect.  The correct graph is shown below.

This graph shows cross-sectional area vs. height h.

 

We interpret trapezoidal areas:

This illustrates why the trapezoidal areas correspond to the approximate volumes of slices of the sphere.

The graph depicted below could be broken into trapezoids and would indicate cross-sectional areas from h = 0 thru h = 1.5.  This graph would be the same as that shown previously, except that the former graph extended only to h = .3.

wpe19A.jpg (11189 bytes)

The table below summarizes the information we would get form this graph, representing slice areas from h = 0  to h = 1.5 cm.  This takes us from the lowest point of the marble almost to the highest (recall that the diameter of the marble is about 1.57 cm).

The table shows

h r area of c.s. of cut trapezoidal ave slice area trapezoidal graph area
0 0 0
0.1 0.382099463 0.4586736 0.2293368 0.02293368
0.2 0.521536192 0.8545152 0.6565944 0.06565944
0.3 0.614817046 1.1875248 1.02102 0.102102
0.4 0.681175455 1.4577024 1.3226136 0.13226136
0.5 0.728010989 1.665048 1.5613752 0.15613752
0.6 0.758946638 1.8095616 1.7373048 0.17373048
0.7 0.77588659 1.8912432 1.8504024 0.18504024
0.8 0.779743548 1.9100928 1.900668 0.1900668
0.9 0.770713955 1.8661104 1.8881016 0.18881016
1 0.748331477 1.759296 1.8127032 0.18127032
1.1 0.71133677 1.5896496 1.6744728 0.16744728
1.2 0.657267069 1.3571712 1.4734104 0.14734104
1.3 0.581377674 1.0618608 1.209516 0.1209516
1.4 0.473286383 0.7037184 0.8827896 0.08827896
1.5 0.3 0.282744 0.4932312 0.04932312
1.971354

The preceding discussion shows us how the graph of cross-sectional area vs. vertical position gives us the corresponding volume of the corresponding part of the sphere.

 

The integral does work out (if we include pi in the integral) to duplicate the result we get from the formula V = 4/3 pi r^3 for the volume of a sphere.

Find the derivative of each of the following:

Does each of the following look like a substitution situation or an integration by parts situation, both or neither?  Specify the substitution or breakdown into u and dv you would use for each:

We integrate 1 / [ (x-2)(x+5) ] using partial fractions:

We integrate 1 / [ (x-2)(x^2+5) ] using partial fractions:

Check out the assertion made last time that integral (1 / sqrt(t-2), t, 1, 3) does indeed converge.

 

 

Find the derivative of each of the following:

Does each of the following look like a substitution situation or an integration by parts situation, both or neither?  Specify the substitution or breakdown into u and dv you would use for each:

We integrate 1 / [ (x-2)(x+5) ] using partial fractions:

We integrate 1 / [ (x-2)(x^2+5) ] using partial fractions:

Check out the assertion made last time that integral (1 / sqrt(t-2), t, 1, 3) does indeed converge.

For t > 1 how does the graph of y = 4 / (t-.5)^2 compare with the graph of y = 1 / t and the graph of 1 / t^1.01?  What does this comparison tell you about the convergence or divergence of y = 4 / (t-.5)^2?

 

Quickly find antiderivatives for all the functions shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

Find derivative and simples antiderivative of each:

 

 

 

 

 

Only simplified final forms are given here: