#$&*
Phy 201
Your 'cq_1_01.2' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** CQ_1_01.2_labelMessages **
The problem:
Answer the following:
How accurately do you think you can measure the time between two events using the TIMER program?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
In my opinion, this depends on the time between the two events. If the events are spaced out a little then I believe the TIMER program measurements are fairly accurate. However, if the two events are spaced rather close together than TIMER program measurements are less accurate.
#$&*
What is the shortest time interval you think you would be able to measure with reasonable accuracy?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
I’m thinking the shortest time interval is 1-2 seconds
#$&*
How does the percent error in timing intervals change as the time between the events gets smaller?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line): The percent error increases as timing intervals decrease.
#$&*
How accurately are you able to measure the positions of the ball and the pendulum in the initial video?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
Using the TIMER program to measure the positions there is a .01 accuracy level. However, I had some trouble reading the measurements do to the quality of the video. Because, the of the poor quality the accuracy is comprised to a certain extent.
#$&*
*#&!*#&!
&#This looks good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#