Open QA 27

#$&*

course Phy 121

4.20.11 at 9:45pm

027. Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation

*********************************************

Question: `q001. Note that this assignment contains 8 questions.

Masses attract each other. The forces of attraction are equal and opposite: The force

exerted by one small concentrated mass on another is equal in magnitude but in the opposite

direction from the force exerted on it by the other. Greater masses exert greater

attractions on one another.

If two such objects remain separated by the same distance while one object increases to 10

times its original mass while the other remains the same, there will be 10 times the

original force.

If both objects increase to 10 times their original masses, there will be 100 times the

original force.

The force of attraction is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between

the objects. That means that if the objects move twice as far apart, the force becomes 1 /

2^2 = 1/4 as great; if they move 10 times as far apart, the force becomes 1 / 10^2 = 1/100

as great.

The same statements hold for spherical objects which have mass distributions which are

symmetric about their centers, provided we regard the distance between the objects as the

distance between their centers.

Suppose a planet exerts a force of 10,000 Newtons on a certain object (perhaps a

satellite) when that object is 8000 kilometers from the center of the planet. How much

force does the satellite exert on the planet?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

-10,000

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The gravitational forces exerted by the planet and the object are equal and opposite, and

are both forces of attraction, so that the object must be exerting a force of 10,000

Newtons on the planet. The object is pulled toward the planet, and the planet is pulled

toward the object.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

Would it be negative, as I wrote? Or is it safer just to say 10,000?

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

@& Actually the question was 'how much force', not 'what force'. So the magnitude 10 000 would be a correct answer.

If you specify a positive direction, then it's OK to also include the direction of the force.*@

*********************************************

Question: `q002. If the object and the planet are both being pulled by the same force,

why is it that the object accelerates toward the planet rather than the planet

accelerating toward the object?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The planet is much larger. Gravity will also play a role.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Presumably the planet is much more massive than the object. Since the acceleration of any

object is equal to the net force acting on it divided by its mass, the planet with its

much greater mass will experience much less acceleration. The minuscule acceleration of

the planet toward a small satellite will not be noticed by the inhabitants of the planet.

COMMON ERROR: The planet is bigger so it attracts the satellite, but the satellite doesn't

attract the planet.

INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: It's not correct to say that the planet, being much bigger, attracts

the satellite while the satellite doesn't attract the planet. They attract one another,

exerting equal and opposite forces on one another and therefore accelerate one another, but

the due to its greater mass the planet's acceleration is much less than that of the

satellite.<

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

Gravity may or may not play a role, right? It depends on whether the planet has a

gravitational force? I've read that all things with mass experience gravity although, I

think I've also heard otherwise.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

@& Whatever the source of the 'otherwise', ignore it. If it's got mass, it exerts a gravitational force.*@

*********************************************

Question: `q003. If the mass of the object in the preceding exercise is suddenly cut in

half, as say by a satellite burning fuel, while the distance remains at 8000 km, then what

will be the gravitational force exerted on it by the planet?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

0.5(mass)(9.8m/sec^2) = gravitational force

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Halving the mass of the object, while implicitly keeping the mass of the planet and the

distance of the object the same, will halve the force of mutual attraction from 10,000

Newtons to 5,000 Newtons.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q004. How much force would be experienced by a satellite with 6 times the mass

of this object at 8000 km from the center of a planet with half the mass of the original

planet?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

It will experience 6x the force.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The distance is the same as in the previous examples, so increasing the mass by a factor of

6 would to result in 6 times the force, provided everything else remained the same; but

halving the mass of the planet would result in halving this force so the resulting force

would be only 1/2 * 6 = 3 times is great as the original, or 3 * 10,000 N = 30,000 N.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q005. How much force would be experienced by the original object at a distance

of 40,000 km from the center of the original planet?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

1/5^2 = 0.04

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The object is 40,000 km / (8000 km) = 5 times as far from the planet as originally. Since

the force is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance, the object will at

this new distance experience a force of 1 / 5^2 = 1/25 times the original, or 1/25 * 10,000

N = 400 N.

STUDENT QUESTION

What does it mean when the force is proportional to the inverse of the square of the

distance??

INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE

That means the if the distance changes by factor r, the force changes by factor 1 / r^2.

So for example

if the distance becomes half as great the force becomes 1 / (1/2)^2 = 1 / 4 = 4 times as

great

if the distance doubles the force becomes 1 / 2^2 = 1/4 as great

if the distance increases by a factor of 3 the force would become 1 / 3^2 = 1/9 as great

This goes back to the image of the gravitational effect of the mass being spread, as

distance increases, over increasingly large concentric spheres. The areas of the spheres

increase, spreading the gravitational effect over their increasing areas and reducing the

gravitational field accordingly. Since the area of a sphere increases in proportion to the

square of its radius, the gravitational field decreases in proportion to the square of the

distance. So we say that the gravitational field, and hence the force felt by a small

object at different distances, is inversely proportional to the distance.

This explanation is intended just to give you the general idea of the proportionality and

the reasons for it. A full explanation requires the concept of flux and the techniques of

multivariable calculus.

STUDENT QUESTION

40,000/8000= 5

so it is five times less

1/r^2 = 1/5^2 = 1/25 * 10,000= 400N

I guess you divide what you have by what the original was always?

INSTRUCTOR COMMENT

There are more formal ways, but when it comes down to intuitive calculations you can do as

follows:

Find the ratio of the distances and square that ratio.

Depending on which ratio you find, to get the new force you will either multiply or divide

by the squared ratio, whichever makes sense.

The one that makes sense will increase the force if the distance decreases, decrease the

force if the distance increases.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q006. The relationship between the force of attraction and the masses and

separation can be expressed by a proportionality. If the masses of two small, uniformly

spherical objects are m1 and m2, and if the distance between these masses is r, then the

force of attraction between the two objects is given by F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2. G is a

constant of proportionality equal to 6.67 * 10^-11 N m^2 / kg^2. Find the force of

attraction between a 100 kg uniform lead sphere and a 200 kg uniform lead sphere separated

by a center-to-center distance of .5 meter.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

F = 6.67*10^-11 * 100 * 200 / 0.5^2

F = 5.3*10^-6

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

We are given the two masses m1 = 100 kg and m2 = 200 kg and the separation r = .5 meter

between their centers. We can use the relationship

F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2

directly by simply substituting the masses and the separation. We find that the force is

F = 6.67 * 10^-11 N m^2 / kg^2 * 100 kg * 200 kg / (.5 m)^2 = 5.3 * 10^-6 Newton.

Note that the m^2 unit in G will be divided by the square of the m unit in the denominator,

and that the kg^2 in the denominator of G will be multiplied by the kg^2 we get from

multiplying the two masses, so that the m^2 and the kg^2 units disappear from our

calculation.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q007. If these two objects were somehow suspended so that the net force on

them was just their mutual gravitational attraction, at what rate would the first object

accelerate toward the second, and if both objects were originally are rest approximately

how long would it take it to move the first centimeter?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

a = 5.3*10^-6 / 100kg

a = 5.336*10^-8m/s^2

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

A mass of 100 kg subject a net force of 5.3 * 10^-6 N will have acceleration of a = 5.3 *

10^-6 N / (100 kg) = 5.3 * 10^-8 m/s^2.

At this rate to move from rest (v0 = 0) thru the displacement of one centimeter (`ds = .01

m) would require time `dt such that `ds = v0 `dt + .5 a `dt^2; since v0 = 0 this

relationship is just `ds = .5 a `dt^2, so

`dt = `sqrt( 2 `ds / a)

= `sqrt( 2 * .01 m / (5.3 * 10^-8 m/s^2) )

= `sqrt( 3.8 * 10^5 m / (m/s^2) ) = 6.2 * 10^2 sec, or about 10 minutes.

Of course the time would be a bit shorter than this because the object, while moving

somewhat closer (and while the other object in turn moved closer to the center of gravity

of the system), would experience a slightly increasing force and therefore a slightly

increasing acceleration.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q008. At what rate would the second object accelerate toward the first?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

a = 5.3 * 10^-6 / 200 kg

a = 2.65 * 10^-8

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The second object, with its 200 kg mass, would also a subject to a net force of 5.3 * 10^-6

N and would therefore experience and acceleration of

a = 5.3 * 10^-6 N / (200 kg) = 2.7 * 10^-8 m/s^2.

This is half the rate at which the first object changes its velocity; this is due to the

equal and opposite nature of the forces and to the fact that the second object has twice

the mass of the first.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `q008. At what rate would the second object accelerate toward the first?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

a = 5.3 * 10^-6 / 200 kg

a = 2.65 * 10^-8

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The second object, with its 200 kg mass, would also a subject to a net force of 5.3 * 10^-6

N and would therefore experience and acceleration of

a = 5.3 * 10^-6 N / (200 kg) = 2.7 * 10^-8 m/s^2.

This is half the rate at which the first object changes its velocity; this is due to the

equal and opposite nature of the forces and to the fact that the second object has twice

the mass of the first.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

#*&!

&#Very good work. Let me know if you have questions. &#