Class 091123

Things you really should know at this point

You should know the meanings of the following expressions:

`q001.  Identify each of the expressions listed above and explain its meaning.

^^^^

&&&&

`q002.  What relationship would you use to find each of the following, and how would use use it?

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

Repeat previous experiment

Today you repeated the experiment from last Monday's class, involving the rotating strap with the dominoes and magnets.

Note the following:

Calibrate a rubber band chain using 1 domino, 4 dominoes and the number of dominoes which when suspended stretches your rubber band system to the length used in this experiment.

Having completed your observations, you should repeat the analysis of that experiment, as instructed in the 091116 notes, and submit.  You may submit only that part of the document; this time use the title 'ic_091116_exp_repeat'.

If you have already submitted work on this experiment, please note:

`q003.  Sketch a graph of the force stretching your rubber band system, in domino weights, vs. its length in cm.  Sketch the straight line you think best fits the data.

What is the slope of your graph, in domino weights per cm?

^^^^

&&&&

What is the slope of your graph, in Newtons / m (you may assume that a domino weighs .2 Newton)?

^^^^

&&&&

The slope of your straight line was affected by the third point, where the rubber band was stretched to the length used in the experiment.  We might get a slightly different result using only the 1- and 4-domino points.  What is the slope, based only on these points?

^^^^

&&&&

What is the meaning of the slope of this graph?

^^^^

&&&&

How does the slope change if you increase the length of the chain?

^^^^

&&&&

How does the perceived 'stiffness' of the rubber band system change with increasing chain length?

^^^^

&&&&

Your F vs. L graph; F vs. x graph

The graph below is similar to that you obtained for F vs. L when you calibrated your rubber band, with the straight line approximately fitting the three data points.  (The line has been extended here below the horizontal axis, which would correspond to negative forces; your rubber band chain won't exert forces when its length falls below its unstretched length, so this isn't realistic, but we will soon see examples where this extension of the line is necessary and realistic).

We sketch a vertical line through the horizontal intercept of the straight line:

The horizontal intercept is our equilibrium point--the point at which the force exerted by the rubber band system is zero. 

It will simplify our analysis to measure horizontal position relative to the equilibrium point.

We will therefore replace our original coordinate system with one whose origin is at this equilibrium point.  So we will use our new vertical line as the y axis, and will again label the vertical coordinate F, for force.  We will label the horizontal coordinate x. 

Our x coordinate now represents the horizontal position relative to the equilibrium point.  We can now do away with our original y axis, and we obtain the graph below:

This graph depicts the force exerted by the rubber band as a function of the distance its end is pulled from the equilibrium force.  However there is one thing we still need to do to indicate force vs. position.  The force exerted by a rubber band at its end is in the direction opposite the direction in which that end is displaced (i.e., if you move the end to the right, the resulting change in the force is to the left; the rubber band 'pulls back' against you).

So in order to depict the force exerted by the rubber band, positive values of position x should be associated with negative forces.  Force and position should have opposite signs.  So our final graph is as shown below:

The straight line depicted by the graph goes through the origin.  If we denote its slope by -k, then its equation is

To get the force for position x, provided we know the value of k, we just substitute that value of x into the equation F = - k x and we get the force. 

Now let's assume that x has some specific value A:

F = - k x = - k A.

It's worth noting that when x = 0 we get F = - k * 0 = 0. 

The forces as x = 0 and x = A are indicated on the figure below.  The x = A position corresponds to the vertical line labeled 'x = A', and the resulting force is indicated by the vertical projection line:

`q004.  We want to determine the work done by this rubber band as we stretch it by moving its end from the equilibrium position to the x = A position.  To do so we need to find the average force exerted by the rubber band and the corresponding displacement as we move between the two positions.

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

Experiment

Using the same rubber band chain you calibrated in the preceding experiment, suspend a 4-domino mass, allow the suspended system to oscillate at its natural frequency (being careful that the rubber band never goes slack), and count oscillations for 10 seconds.

`q005.  If k is the slope of the force vs. length graph for your rubber band system, and m the mass of the dominoes, then what is omega = sqrt(k / m)?

^^^^

&&&&

The units of your calculation should have worked out to 1/s, or s^-1.  Your solution should have showed how this works out.  We aren't going to go into the details of exactly how (it's related to the fact that a meter of arc divided by a meter of radius is a radian), but a radian also appears in the result, and proper unit turns out to be rad / s or rad s^-1.

If a point moves around a reference circle of radius 3 cm, at the angular velocity you just calculated, then what is its speed in cm / s? 

^^^^

&&&&

What therefore is its centripetal acceleration?

^^^^

&&&&

If the reference-circle point represents a mass of .8 kg, then what are the KE of the object, and the centripetal force holding it in its circular path?

^^^^

&&&&

If the reference-circle point starts at the positive x axis, then after .1 second, what will be the angle of the r vector?

^^^^

&&&&

`q006.  This problem is a continuation of the previous.

To answer the following it is suggested that you first sketch the reference-circle figure for each of the given instants, use the figure to estimate the requested quantities, then use sines and/or cosines to refine your estimate with an accurate result:

At the .1 second instant:

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

Answer the same questions for the instant .2 seconds after the start.

^^^^

&&&&

 

`q007.  One circuit around the reference circle corresponds to an angle of 2 pi radians, or 360 degrees. 

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

`q008.  At the angular velocity corresponding to the system you observed:

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

Areas of difficulty from previous assignments

`q009.  Reason out the units in each question:

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

`q010.  Answer without using your calculator.  You won't learn anything by using the calculator, and you stand a good chance of getting the wrong answer if you do use the calculator.  You need to be able to do this, and even top students in physics often come into the course not knowing how to calculate with powers of 10.

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

The idea of SHM

Reference circle summary

For a point moving counterclockwise around a circle, if the angular position of the r vector is theta then

all angles measured counterclockwise from the positive x axis.

The idea of SHM

If mass m is subject to net force

then if the object is given an initial velocity and/or is pulled away from the equilibrium point at x = 0 and released, its position can be modeled by a point moving around a reference circle with angular velocity

The position, velocity and acceleration of the object are respectively the x components of the r, v and a_cent vectors of the reference circle.

Assuming the net force to be conservative, there are no nonconservative forces acting on the oscillator so `dW_nc_on = 0 and `dPE + `dKE = 0.  Thus the total of the potential and kinetic energies is zero.

`q011.  A pendulum, swinging freely with an amplitude much less than its length, is one example of a simple harmonic oscillator (another being a mass suspended from an ideal spring or rubber band chain and oscillating up and down). 

At position x = 3 cm a certain pendulum has kinetic energy 4 Joules and potential energy 2 Joules.

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

^^^^

&&&&

Complete characterization of SHM

What follows is a series of more precise statements about SHM.  Next week we will work out the meaning of these statements through experiment, lecture and class notes.  You don't need to know all this now, but it will be worth your time to read it now and make some notes.

Refined statements

If the motion of an object is the projection on a fixed line of the position of a reference point moving at constant velocity around a reference circle, then that motion is called Simple Harmonic Motion (abbreviated SHM).  Usually the fixed line is in the direction of either the x or the y axis, but it need not be so.

If a mass m is subject to a net force of the form F = - k x, then if displaced from equilibrium and released it undergoes simple harmonic motion centered at the equilibrium point. (The same happens if the object, whatever its position, is given a nonzero initial velocity relative to the reference point).  The reference point moves around the circle with angular velocity omega = sqrt( k / m ).

Energy of the oscillator

Three statements characterize the energy of the oscillating mass:

Consequences and observations

In time interval `dt the reference-circle point (which is characterized by angular velocity omega = sqrt(k/m) ) moves through angle `dTheta = omega * `dt

r_x = A cos(omega * t). 

v_x = omega * A cos(omega t + 90 deg) and

a_cent_x = omega^2 A cos(omega t + 180 deg). 

More about the energy of the oscillator:

Since total energy = PE + KE we can therefore say that 1/2 k x^2 + 1/2 m v^2 = 1/2 k A^2.

Starting position (t = 0 position) of the oscillator:

Homework:

Your label for this assignment: 

ic_class_091123

Copy and paste this label into the form.

Answer the questions posed above and submit.

Note on last two weeks of class, Test 2, final exam: