#$&*
course Phy 201
12/3 1
Data For Rubberband Tension38.2 cm is original total length
11 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 1 and 2
11 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 2 and 3
One Domino
40.5 cm total length
12 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 1 and 2
12 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 2 and 3
Two Dominos
41 cm total length
12.5 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 1 and 2
12.5 cm -distance between halfway of rubber band 2 and 3
Three Dominos
41.3 cm total length
12.5 cm - distance between halfway of rubber band 1 and 2
12.5 cm -distance between halfway of rubber band 2 and 3
Analye Data:
Compare the length with the force in a Force vs. Length. The force being on the y axis and the length being on the x axis.
There should be three graphs one that is for the total length and three for the halfway between rubberbands groups.
The first graph is the graph of the total length vs. the force( the dominoe forces from the Rubberband Calibrationg lab.
The next graph will be the rubberband 1 and 2 vs the force. The next graph is the 2 and 3 rubberband vs. the Force.
@&
@&
The order is force vs. length, as you say previously. You wouldn't then ask for a graph of length vs. force.
Also you say the graph will be of 'rubberband 1 and 2 vs. force'. The phrase 'rubber band 1 and 2' doesn't sufficiently define exactly what is meant.
The analyzer might be able to interpret this as the length between the marks on the two rubber bands, but in my experience it is usually necessary to state exactly what quantities need to be graphed.
*@
*@
The next graph is rubberband 1 to 3 vs. the force of the dominoes. That should total four graphs and graph all information given.
Report the data in a a table with number of rubberband, length, then force.
@&
This is a good description of the table you are requesting.
You previously asked that the quantities be graphed. It would be appropriate to ask for a description of the graphs, and comparisons between the shapes of the graphs.
*@
Questions
Are the data as presented plausible? Is there anything about the data that appears implausible? Are there any obvious limits to the accuracy of the data?
If you were to suggest a revision to the design of the experiment, in order to get more conclusive results, what suggestions would you make? "
@&
Consider my suggestions. If you want to run your final draft by me, I'll be glad to look and respond. Otherwise you can send your final draft to your analyzer.
*@