first 23

course Mth 173

Some of my queries are missing in the graded work submitted page. Do I need to send the entire file?

You probably won't need to resubmit. However please submit a separate request for me to locate the missing files, and include a copy of this message. From what I can tell looking at your page, #16 was submitted sometime between the 7th and 19th of March, and #19 between Mar 26 and Apr 3. Are any others missing?

I would search now for the files but I need to first respond to student work for today; hopefully I'll remember to go back and check, but I might need your prompt.

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

04-13-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:12:16

Query 4.3.34 (3d edition extra problem): Sketch a possible graph for a function which is positive, continuous, with a global maximum at (3,3); the 1st and 2d derivatives have the same sign for x<3, opposite signs for x > 3.

Describe your graph, telling where it is increasing in decreasing, where it is concave up where it is concave down, and where (if anywhere) it has local maxima and minima.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

1st derivative of x<3 is positive

2nd derivative of x<3 is positive

The line would start above the negative x axis and going up to eventually (3,3).

1st derivative of x>3 is negative

2nd derivative of x>3 is positive

The line would start going down and eventually end up be above the positive x axis.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:12:18

** The function would have to be increasing for x < 3, which would make the first derivative positive. The second derivative could also be positive, with the function starting out with an asymptote to the negative x axis and gradually curving upward to reach (3,3). It would then have to start decreasing, which would make the first derivative negative, so the second derivative would have to be positive. The function would have be sort of 'pointed' at (3,3). The graph, which would have to remain positive, could then approach the positive x axis as an asymptote, always decreasing and always concave up.

The horizontal asymptotes would not have to be at the x axis and could in fact by at any y < 3. The asymptote to the right also need not equal the asymptote to the left. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:13:47

Query problem 4.3.31 (3d edition 4.3.29) f(v) power of flying bird vs. v; concave up, slightly decreasing for small v; a(v) energy per meter.

Why do you think the graph as the shape it does?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

This problem confuses me. I understand the chart to be the rate of energy. I don't know where to start with this problem.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:13:49

** the graph actually doesn't give energy vs. velocity -- the authors messed up when they said that -- it gives the rate of energy usage vs. velocity. They say this in the problem, but the graph is mislabeled.

The graph says that for high velocities the rate of energy usage, in Joules / second, increases with increasing velocity. That makes sense because the bird will be fighting air resistance for a greater distance per second, which will require more energy usage. To make matters worse for the bird, as velocity increases the resistance is not only fought a greater distance every second but the resistance itself increases. So the increase in energy usage for high velocities isn't too hard to understand.

However the graph also shows that for very low velocities energy is used at a greater rate than for slightly higher velocities. This is because low velocities imply hovering, or near-hovering, which requires more energy than the gliding action the bird achieves at somewhat higher velocities. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:14:15

Query Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I think my surprise was the last question. I cannot believe the book was mislabeled. That confused me.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

09:14:19

I had some difficulty with the graphical interpretations, but I think going over more notes can give me a better understanding

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

"

I do suggest detailed self-critique on that graphical interpretation; I also welcome additional questions.