course Mth 163 Sorry it's taking so long I just don't want to rush and not understand the assignments. assignment #004004. `query 4
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:16:33 `questionNumber 40000 Where f(x) = x^3, what are f(-2), f(-a), f(x-4) and f(x) - 4?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> f(-2)=(-2)^3 f(-a)=(-a)^3 f(x-4)=(x-4)^3 f(x)-4=(x)-4^3 You just substitute into equation. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:16:45 `questionNumber 40000 ** COMMON ERROR WITH COMMENT: Where f(x) = x^3, f(-2) = -2^3 INSTRUCTOR CRITIQUE: Write that f(-2) = (-2)^3. By order of operations -2^3 = -(2^3) (you exponentiate first, before you apply the negative, which is effectively a multiplication by -1). For an odd power like 3 it makes no difference in the end---in both cases the result is -8 COMMON ERROR WITH COMMENT: f(-a) = -a^3. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT:f(-a) = (-a)^3, which because of the odd power is the same as -a^3. If g(x) = x^2, g(-a) would be (-a)^2 = a^2. ANSWERS TO THE REMAINING TWO QUESTIONS: f(x-4) = (x-4)^3. If you expand that you get (x^2 - 8 x + 16) ( x - 4) = x^3 - 12 x^4 + 48 x - 64. In more detail the expansion is as follows: (x-4)^3 = (x-4)(x-4)(x-4) = [ (x-4)(x-4) ] * (x-4) = [ x ( x - 4) - 4 ( x - 4) ] ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 4 x - 4 x + 16) ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 8x + 16) ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 8x + 16) * x - (x^2 - 8x + 16) * 4 = x^2 * x - 8 x * x + 16 * x - x^2 * 4 - (-8x) * 4 - 16 * 4 = x^3 - 8 x^2 + 16 x - 4 x^2 + 32 x - 64 = x^3 - 12 x^2 + 48 x - 64. f(x) - 4 = x^3 - 4. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> ok i see self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:19:13 `questionNumber 40000 Where f(x) = 2^x, find f(2), f(-a), f(x+3) and f(x) + 3?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> f(2)=2^2= f(2)=4 f(-a)=2^(-a) f(x+3)=2^(x+3) f(x)+3=2^(x)+3 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:19:26 `questionNumber 40000 ** Where f(x) = 2^x we have: f(2)= 2^2 or 4; f(a) = 2^a; f(x+3) = 2^(x+3); and f(x) + 3 = 2^x + 3. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> ok i got it self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:19:44 `questionNumber 40000 query functions given by meaningful names. What are some of the advantages of using meaninful names for functions?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> It's easier to understand and comprehend quicker confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:19:54 `questionNumber 40000 ** TWO STUDENT RESPONSES: Using the function notation gives more meaning to our equations. Example... 'depth(t) = ' is a lot more understandable than ' y = ' I read of the pros and cons in using names. I think using names helps to give meaning to the equation, especially if it's one you haven't looked at for a couple days, you know right away what you were doing by reading the 'meaningful' notation.**
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> i see self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:26:35 `questionNumber 40000 What were your results for value(0), value(2), value(t+3) and value(t+3)/value(t)?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> value(0)=$1000(1.07)^0=$1070 value(2)=$1000(1.07)^2=$1144.9 value(t+3) =cancel out 1000 then break down the 1.07^(t+3) into (1.07^t)(1.07^3) then the (1.07^t) from top and bottom cancel out and you get value (t+3)/value(t)=1.07^3 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:27:08 `questionNumber 40000 ** Substitute very carefully and show your steps: value(0) = $1000(1.07)^0 = $ 1000 value(2) = $1000(1.07)^2 = $1144.90 value(t + 3) = $1000(1.07)^(t + 3) value(t + 3) / value (t) = [$1000(1.07)^(t + 3)] / [ $1000(1.07)^t] , which we simplify. The $1000 in the numerator can be divided by the $1000 in the denominator to give us value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^(t+3) / [ 1.07^t]. By the laws of exponents 1.07^(t+3) = 1.07^t * 1.07^3 so we get value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^t * 1.07^3 / [ 1.07^t]. The 1.07^t divides out and we end up with value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^3. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I think I understand self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:33:23 `questionNumber 40000 What did you get for illumination(distance)/illumination(2*distance)? Show your work on this one.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Put [50/distance^2]/[50/(2*distance)^2] Cancel out 50's leaves you with distance^2/(2*distance)^2= leaves 1/4th confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:33:47 `questionNumber 40000 ** We substitute carefully and literally to get illumination (distance) / illumination (2*distance) = [50 / distance^2] / [50 / (2*distance)^2] which is a complex fraction and needs to be simplified. You invert the denominator and multiply to get [ 50 / distance^2 ] * [ (2 * distance)^2 / 50 ] = (2 * distance)^2 / distance^2 = 4 * distance^2 / distance^2 = 4. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> got math backwards but understand how solution was achieved. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:34:50 `questionNumber 40000 query #3. Sketch a reasonable graph of y = f(x), if it is known that f(2) = 80, f(5) = 40 and f(10) = 25. Explain how you constructed your graph.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> My xand y's were (2,80), (5,40) and (10,25) confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:35:00 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT ANSWER WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: I used graph paper counted each small square as 2 units in each direction, I put a dot for the points (2,80), (5,40), & (10,25) and connected the dots with lines. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The points could be connected with straight lines, but you might also have used a smooth curve. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> i see self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:39:14 `questionNumber 40000 what is your estimate of value of x for which f(x) = 60?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> take (2,80) and (5,40) and find median 2+5=7/2=3.5 and 80+40/2=60 so it would 3.5 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:39:27 `questionNumber 40000 **If your graph was linear from the point (2, 80) to the point (5, 40) you would estimate x = 3.5, since 3.5 is halfway from 2 to 5 and 60 is halfway from 80 to 40. However with f(10) = 25 a straightforward smooth curve would be decreasing at a decreasing rate and the y = 60 value would probably occur just a bit earlier, perhaps somewhere around x = 3.3**
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I was close self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:39:53 `questionNumber 40000 what is your estimate of the value f(7)?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Approx. 32 by looks of graph confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:40:05 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: My estimation for the value of f(7) was f(7) = 34. A linear graph between (5, 40) and (10, 25) would have slope -3 and would therefore decline by 6 units between x = 5 and x = 7, giving your estimate of 34. However the graph is probably decreasing at a decreasing rate, implying a somewhat greater decline between 5 and 7 that would be implied by a straight-line approximation. A better estimate might be f(7) = 32 or 33. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Still close self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:40:48 `questionNumber 40000 what is your estimate of the difference between f(7) and f(9)?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> f(9) approximately 28 difference is about 4 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:41:02 `questionNumber 40000 ** If f(7) = 32 and f(9) = 27, not unreasonable estimates, then the difference is 5. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> i was close self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:43:51 `questionNumber 40000 what is your estimate of the difference in x values between the points where f(x) = 70 and where f(x) = 30?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> x approx. 3 and 8 diff= 5. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:44:10 `questionNumber 40000 ** f(x) will be 70 somewhere around x = 3 and f(x) will be 30 somewhere around x = 8 or 9. The difference in these x values is about 5 or 6. On your graph you could draw horizontal lines at y = 70 and at y = 30. You could then project these lines down to the x axis. The distance between these projection lines, which again should probably be around 5 or 6, can be estimated by the scale of the graph. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> i was pretty close self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:44:58 `questionNumber 40000 query #4. temperature vs. clock time function y = temperature = T(t), what is the symbolic expression for ...
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> T(3)+T(5)/2 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:45:25 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT SOLUTION WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The temperature at time t = 3; T(3)The temperature at time t = 5; T(5) The change in temperature between t = 3 and t = 5; T(3) - T(5) The order of the expressions is important. For example the change between 30 degrees and 80 degrees is 80 deg - 30 deg = 50 degrees; the change between 90 degrees and 20 degrees is 20 deg - 90 deg = -70 deg. The change between T(3) and T(5) is T(5) - T(3). When we specify the change in a quantity we subtract the earlier value from the later. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: To average two numbers you add them and divide by 2. The average of the temperatures at t = 3 and t = 5 is therefore [T(3) + T(5)] /2 **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Worked out on paper and I'm pretty sure I get it. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:46:12 `questionNumber 40000 What equation would we solve to find the clock time when the model predicts a temperature of 150? How would we find the length of time required for the temperature to fall from 80 to 30?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> T(80)-T(30) confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:48:09 `questionNumber 40000 ** GOOD STUDENT SOLUTION: To find the clock time when the model predicts a temperature of 150 we would solve the equation T(t) = 150. To find the length of time required for the temperature to fall from 80 to 30 we would first solve the equation T(t) = 80 to get the clock time at 80 degrees then find the t value or clok time when T(t) = 30. Then we could subtract the smaller t value from the larger t value to get the answer. [ value of t at T(t) = 30] - [ value of t at T(t) = 80)] **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I kind of guessed at that one but after reading the explanation I sort of understand. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:49:21 `questionNumber 40000 query. use the f(x) notation at every opportunity:For how long was the depth between 34 and 47 centimeters?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> depth=f(x)vs time f(x)=34 1st f(x)=47 2nd subtract 1st from second. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:50:16 `questionNumber 40000 ** If depth = f(t) then you would solve f(t) = 34 to obtain t1 and f(t) = 47 to obtain t2. Then you would find abs(t2-t1). We use the absolute value because we don't know which is greater, t1 or t2, and the questions was 'how long' rather than 'what is the change in clock time ... ' **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I understand better after reading the solution. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:51:08 `questionNumber 40000 By how much did the depth change between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> f(x)=23 f(x)=34=f(34)-f(23) i think confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:51:48 `questionNumber 40000 ** This would be f(34) - f(23). If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 and f(23) = 60.8 so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 - 60.8 = -10.2. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> forgot to finish but my answer was a few tenths different. I sorta see how solution was achieved. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:52:57 `questionNumber 40000 On the average, how many seconds did it take for the depth to change by 1 centimeter between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> f(34)-f(23)=11 approximately confidence assessment: 1
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:53:43 `questionNumber 40000 ** Change in depth would be f(34) - f(23). Change in t would be 34 s - 23 s = 11 s. Thus change in t / change in depth = 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ]. If f(t) gives depth in cm this result will be in seconds / centimeter, the ave number of seconds required for depth to change by 1 cm. If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, f(t) in cm, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 cm and f(23) = 60.8 cm so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 cm - 60.8 cm = -10.2 cm so that 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ] = 11 s / (-10.2 cm) = -1.08 sec / cm, indicating that depth decreases by 1 cm in 1.08 seconds. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I didn't divide 11 by -10.2 to get the answer -1.08 self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:54:05 `questionNumber 40000 On the average, how by many centimeters did the depth change per second between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> almost one cm/ per second a little less. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:54:45 `questionNumber 40000 ** Change in depth would be f(34) - f(23). Change in t would be 34 s - 23 s = 11 s. Thus change in depth / change in t = [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s). If f(t) gives depth in cm this result will be in centimeters / second, the ave number of centimeters of depth change during each second. If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, f(t) in cm, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 cm and f(23) = 60.8 cm so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 cm - 60.8 cm = -10.2 cm so that [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s) = (-10.2 cm) / (11 s) = -.92 cm / sec, indicating that between t = 23 sec and t = 34 sec depth decreases by -.92 cm in 1 sec, on the average. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I almost got the same answer except I forgot to carry the negative sign. Just simple math errors. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:55:10 `questionNumber 40000 query. A hypothetical depth vs. time model based on three points, none of which are actual data points. Describe how you constructed your graph.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I drew them using the data points confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:55:38 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE: I sketched a graph using the depth vs. time data:(0, 96), (10, 89), (20, 68), (30, 65), (40, 48), (50, 49), (60, 36), & (70, 41). **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I didn't write the actual amounts out but mine are similar. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:56:05 `questionNumber 40000 What 3 data point did you use as a basis for your model?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> used 10,89 30,65 60,36 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:56:13 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE: After drawing a curved line through the scatter data I placed 3 dots on the graph at aproximately equal intervals. I obtained the x and y locations form the axis, thier locations were at points (4,93), (24, 68) & (60, 41). I used these 3 data points as a basis for obtaining the model equation.**
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> ok self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:56:50 `questionNumber 40000 What was your function model?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> my model was approx .008x^2-1.4x+99 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:57:02 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: The function model obtained from points (4, 93), (24, 68), & (60, 41) is depth(t) = .0089x^2 - 1.4992x + 98.8544. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> mine was close to that. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:57:26 `questionNumber 40000 What is the average deviation for your model?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> the average deviation was approx. 3.68 confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:57:41 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: I added a column 2 columns to the chart given in our assignment one labeled 'Model data' and the other 'Deviation'. I then subtracted the model data readings from the corresponding given data to get the individual deviations. I then averaged out the numbers in the deviation column. The average deviation turned out to be 3.880975.**
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I can understand how they got their answer. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:58:02 `questionNumber 40000 How close is your model to the curve you sketched earlier?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> the model is similar to the curve I sketched earlier confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:58:14 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: I was really suprised at how close the model curve matched the curve that I had sketched earlier. It was very close.**
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> mine too self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:59:16 `questionNumber 40000 Query Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> These are getting harder. self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
18:59:28 `questionNumber 40000 ** STUDENT RESPONSE: I was surprized that the scattered data points on the hypothetical depth vs. time model would fit a curve drawn out through it. The thing that sank in for me with this was to not expect all data to be in neat patterns, but to look for a possible pattern in the data. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Excellent observation **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> ok self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
"