#$&*
Phy 201
Your 'cq_1_01.2' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** **
The problem:
Answer the following:
How accurately do you think you can measure the time between two events
using the TIMER program?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
This depends on the length of time we are timing. If the time is
greater than 2 seconds then I feel we can get a fairly precise time.
However, if we need to time something for less than .5 seconds then we
will lose precision due to human error and the lack of precision of the
timer program.
#$&*
What is the shortest time interval you think you would be able to
measure with reasonable accuracy?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
For the human to be able to have enough time to react efficiently, then
we are at least looking at 1 second and I would be more comfortable
with 2 seconds.
#$&*
How does the percent error in timing intervals change as the time
between the events gets smaller?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
As the events get smaller our error gets larger. Not only does our
human have to react quicker, but the timer program counts in increments
and not continuous.
#$&*
How accurately are you able to measure the positions of the ball and
the pendulum in the initial video?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
This depends on many variables like camera position, which frame we are
looking at, and etc. There were a few frames where the pendulum was
blurred and I was unsure where the pendulum exactly was. Then other
times the pendulum and ball was clear, but the clock was in between
times. So in some frames I could be real precise while in others I had
a large percent of uncertainty.
#$&*
*#&!*#&!
This looks good. Let me know if you have any questions.