#$&*
course Phy 121
1.Seems that 4 rulers were used. By calculating velocity and acceleration you see enough similarities in the numbers to assume that only 4 rulers were used.2.Test 1. 4 cycles up 7 cycles down. Test 2. 4.5 cycles up 6 cycles down.
3. The ball took longer to go back down the ramp. The ball preformed this way because on the upswing the ball had the initial push of the instructor. Whereas, on the down swing the ball came to a full stop before going down only having its own momentum to carry it instead of the instructors initial help.
4. Fairly confident.
5. Fairly confident. We all examined the same the same test so the various data should be close within all results.
6. Maybe somewhere in the middle maybe a little less, but not enough to change the results too much.
7. Average velocity is the average rate of change of position with respect to clock time.
8. This calculation helped show me the number of rulers used to measure each pendulum by calculating velocity and acceleration to show the how similar each pendulum moved. Even though the initial data showed otherwise.
9. It allowed for consistency within data proving that the calculations were correct and that the formulas themselves help quantify the data given.
10. Test 1. Velocity up was 15. Velocity down was 8.57. Test 2. Velocity up 13.3. velocity down was 10
11. Without formulas final velocity is just a guessing game, but you would be able to assume that the upswing velocity is greater than the downswing by listening to the metal ball as it rolls in either direction. The sounds of the upswing would be greater in amplitude due to more velocity and less in amplitude on the down swing.
12. Apply the formula of velocity with respect to clock time form there you could determine acceleration.
13. By taking velocity of 15 with respect to a clock time of 4 for the upswing the acceleration would be 3.75, and by taking the downswing velocity of 8.57 with respect to a clock time of 7 your downswing acceleration would be 1.22. the final test shows upswing velocity of 3.325 and a downswing acceleration of 1.66
14.
15. If off by 2% test 1. Would have velocity of 14.7 on upswing and 8.39 on downswing. Test 2 would have 13.034 on upswing and 8.8 on down swing.
16. If off by 2% test 1 and test 2 acceleration for upswing would be the same at 3.2585. However test 1. Downswing acceleration would be 1.1956 whereas test 2. Downswing acceleration is 1.6268.
"
@&
Your answers to the questions in a document need to be inserted within the document.
Were you to look at this a month from now you wouldn't be able to identify every question being answered.
However your answers do look good. Can you take a few minutes and insert them in the appropriate places within the orginal document, and submit the whole thing?
*@
"
#$&*
course Phy 121
1.Seems that 4 rulers were used. By calculating velocity and acceleration you see enough similarities in the numbers to assume that only 4 rulers were used.2.Test 1. 4 cycles up 7 cycles down. Test 2. 4.5 cycles up 6 cycles down.
3. The ball took longer to go back down the ramp. The ball preformed this way because on the upswing the ball had the initial push of the instructor. Whereas, on the down swing the ball came to a full stop before going down only having its own momentum to carry it instead of the instructors initial help.
4. Fairly confident.
5. Fairly confident. We all examined the same the same test so the various data should be close within all results.
6. Maybe somewhere in the middle maybe a little less, but not enough to change the results too much.
7. Average velocity is the average rate of change of position with respect to clock time.
8. This calculation helped show me the number of rulers used to measure each pendulum by calculating velocity and acceleration to show the how similar each pendulum moved. Even though the initial data showed otherwise.
9. It allowed for consistency within data proving that the calculations were correct and that the formulas themselves help quantify the data given.
10. Test 1. Velocity up was 15. Velocity down was 8.57. Test 2. Velocity up 13.3. velocity down was 10
11. Without formulas final velocity is just a guessing game, but you would be able to assume that the upswing velocity is greater than the downswing by listening to the metal ball as it rolls in either direction. The sounds of the upswing would be greater in amplitude due to more velocity and less in amplitude on the down swing.
12. Apply the formula of velocity with respect to clock time form there you could determine acceleration.
13. By taking velocity of 15 with respect to a clock time of 4 for the upswing the acceleration would be 3.75, and by taking the downswing velocity of 8.57 with respect to a clock time of 7 your downswing acceleration would be 1.22. the final test shows upswing velocity of 3.325 and a downswing acceleration of 1.66
14.
15. If off by 2% test 1. Would have velocity of 14.7 on upswing and 8.39 on downswing. Test 2 would have 13.034 on upswing and 8.8 on down swing.
16. If off by 2% test 1 and test 2 acceleration for upswing would be the same at 3.2585. However test 1. Downswing acceleration would be 1.1956 whereas test 2. Downswing acceleration is 1.6268.
"
@&
Your answers to the questions in a document need to be inserted within the document.
Were you to look at this a month from now you wouldn't be able to identify every question being answered.
However your answers do look good. Can you take a few minutes and insert them in the appropriate places within the orginal document, and submit the whole thing?
*@
"
#$&*
course Phy 121
1.Seems that 4 rulers were used. By calculating velocity and acceleration you see enough similarities in the numbers to assume that only 4 rulers were used.2.Test 1. 4 cycles up 7 cycles down. Test 2. 4.5 cycles up 6 cycles down.
3. The ball took longer to go back down the ramp. The ball preformed this way because on the upswing the ball had the initial push of the instructor. Whereas, on the down swing the ball came to a full stop before going down only having its own momentum to carry it instead of the instructors initial help.
4. Fairly confident.
5. Fairly confident. We all examined the same the same test so the various data should be close within all results.
6. Maybe somewhere in the middle maybe a little less, but not enough to change the results too much.
7. Average velocity is the average rate of change of position with respect to clock time.
8. This calculation helped show me the number of rulers used to measure each pendulum by calculating velocity and acceleration to show the how similar each pendulum moved. Even though the initial data showed otherwise.
9. It allowed for consistency within data proving that the calculations were correct and that the formulas themselves help quantify the data given.
10. Test 1. Velocity up was 15. Velocity down was 8.57. Test 2. Velocity up 13.3. velocity down was 10
11. Without formulas final velocity is just a guessing game, but you would be able to assume that the upswing velocity is greater than the downswing by listening to the metal ball as it rolls in either direction. The sounds of the upswing would be greater in amplitude due to more velocity and less in amplitude on the down swing.
12. Apply the formula of velocity with respect to clock time form there you could determine acceleration.
13. By taking velocity of 15 with respect to a clock time of 4 for the upswing the acceleration would be 3.75, and by taking the downswing velocity of 8.57 with respect to a clock time of 7 your downswing acceleration would be 1.22. the final test shows upswing velocity of 3.325 and a downswing acceleration of 1.66
14.
15. If off by 2% test 1. Would have velocity of 14.7 on upswing and 8.39 on downswing. Test 2 would have 13.034 on upswing and 8.8 on down swing.
16. If off by 2% test 1 and test 2 acceleration for upswing would be the same at 3.2585. However test 1. Downswing acceleration would be 1.1956 whereas test 2. Downswing acceleration is 1.6268.
"
@&
Your answers to the questions in a document need to be inserted within the document.
Were you to look at this a month from now you wouldn't be able to identify every question being answered.
However your answers do look good. Can you take a few minutes and insert them in the appropriate places within the orginal document, and submit the whole thing?
*@
"