Assignment 4

course Mth 163

Your work has been received. Please scroll to the end of the document to see any inserted notes (in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

n֝wǥLassignme TٹJEӠzꔤ Precalculus I 02-04-2006

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:26:00 Where f(x) = x^3, what are f(-2), f(-a), f(x-4) and f(x) - 4?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> f(-2)^3 = -8 f(-a)^3 = -a^3 f(x-4)^3 = (x-4) (x-4) (x-4) x^2-4x-4x+16 (x-4) x^3-4x^2-4x^2+16x-4x^2+16x+16x-64 x^3-12x^2+48x-64

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:26:58 ** COMMON ERROR WITH COMMENT: Where f(x) = x^3, f(-2) = -2^3 INSTRUCTOR CRITIQUE: Write that f(-2) = (-2)^3. By order of operations -2^3 = -(2^3) (you exponentiate first, before you apply the negative, which is effectively a multiplication by -1). For an odd power like 3 it makes no difference in the end---in both cases the result is -8 COMMON ERROR WITH COMMENT: f(-a) = -a^3. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT:f(-a) = (-a)^3, which because of the odd power is the same as -a^3. If g(x) = x^2, g(-a) would be (-a)^2 = a^2. ANSWERS TO THE REMAINING TWO QUESTIONS: f(x-4) = (x-4)^3. If you expand that you get (x^2 - 8 x + 16) ( x - 4) = x^3 - 12 x^4 + 48 x - 64. In more detail the expansion is as follows: (x-4)^3 = (x-4)(x-4)(x-4) = [ (x-4)(x-4) ] * (x-4) = [ x ( x - 4) - 4 ( x - 4) ] ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 4 x - 4 x + 16) ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 8x + 16) ( x - 4) = (x^2 - 8x + 16) * x - (x^2 - 8x + 16) * 4 = x^2 * x - 8 x * x + 16 * x - x^2 * 4 - (-8x) * 4 - 16 * 4 = x^3 - 8 x^2 + 16 x - 4 x^2 + 32 x - 64 = x^3 - 12 x^2 + 48 x - 64. f(x) - 4 = x^3 - 4. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I don't believe I simplified the last problem completely

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:28:42 Where f(x) = 2^x, find f(2), f(-a), f(x+3) and f(x) + 3?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> f(2^2) = 4 f(-2^a) = 2^a f [2^(x+30] = 2^(x+3) f(x)+3 = 2^x+3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:29:04 ** Where f(x) = 2^x we have: f(2)= 2^2 or 4; f(a) = 2^a; f(x+3) = 2^(x+3); and f(x) + 3 = 2^x + 3. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:30:07 query functions given by meaningful names. What are some of the advantages of using meaninful names for functions?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> It gives better understanding to the problems and it makes them easier for you to work out

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:30:43 'depth(t) = ' is a lot more understandable than ' y = ' I read of the pros and cons in using names. I think using names helps to give meaning to the equation, especially if it's one you haven't looked at for a couple days, you know right away what you were doing by reading the 'meaningful' notation.**

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok, I believe I basically have the same idea as the student responses.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:34:21 What were your results for value(0), value(2), value(t+3) and value(t+3)/value(t)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> value(0) = $1000(1.07)^0 = $ 1000 value(2) = $1000(1.07)^2 = $1144.90 value(t + 3) = $1000(1.07)^(t + 3) value(t + 3) / value (t) = [$1000(1.07)^(t + 3)] / [ $1000(1.07)^t] value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^(t+3) / [ 1.07^t]. value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^t * 1.07^3 / [ 1.07^t] value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^3.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:34:49 ** Substitute very carefully and show your steps: value(0) = $1000(1.07)^0 = $ 1000 value(2) = $1000(1.07)^2 = $1144.90 value(t + 3) = $1000(1.07)^(t + 3) value(t + 3) / value (t) = [$1000(1.07)^(t + 3)] / [ $1000(1.07)^t] , which we simplify. The $1000 in the numerator can be divided by the $1000 in the denominator to give us value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^(t+3) / [ 1.07^t]. By the laws of exponents 1.07^(t+3) = 1.07^t * 1.07^3 so we get value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^t * 1.07^3 / [ 1.07^t]. The 1.07^t divides out and we end up with value(t+3) / value(t) = 1.07^3. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok, I didn't put down all of the steps, but came out with the same answer.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:35:42 What did you get for illumination(distance)/illumination(2*distance)? Show your work on this one.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> illumination (distance) / illumination (2*distance) = [50 / distance^2] / [50 / (2*distance)^2] [ 50 / distance^2 ] * [ (2 * distance)^2 / 50 ] (2 * distance)^2 / distance^2 4 * distance^2 / distance^2 = 4

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:35:45 ** We substitute carefully and literally to get illumination (distance) / illumination (2*distance) = [50 / distance^2] / [50 / (2*distance)^2] which is a complex fraction and needs to be simplified. You invert the denominator and multiply to get [ 50 / distance^2 ] * [ (2 * distance)^2 / 50 ] = (2 * distance)^2 / distance^2 = 4 * distance^2 / distance^2 = 4. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:36:30 query #3. Sketch a reasonable graph of y = f(x), if it is known that f(2) = 80, f(5) = 40 and f(10) = 25. Explain how you constructed your graph.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I plotted the points (2,80) (5,40) and (10,25) and then connected them with a curve.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:36:33 ** STUDENT ANSWER WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: I used graph paper counted each small square as 2 units in each direction, I put a dot for the points (2,80), (5,40), & (10,25) and connected the dots with lines. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The points could be connected with straight lines, but you might also have used a smooth curve. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:36:43 what is your estimate of value of x for which f(x) = 60?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> x=3.3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:36:50 **If your graph was linear from the point (2, 80) to the point (5, 40) you would estimate x = 3.5, since 3.5 is halfway from 2 to 5 and 60 is halfway from 80 to 40. However with f(10) = 25 a straightforward smooth curve would be decreasing at a decreasing rate and the y = 60 value would probably occur just a bit earlier, perhaps somewhere around x = 3.3**

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:02 what is your estimate of the value f(7)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> f(7)=32

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:14 ** STUDENT RESPONSE WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: My estimation for the value of f(7) was f(7) = 34. A linear graph between (5, 40) and (10, 25) would have slope -3 and would therefore decline by 6 units between x = 5 and x = 7, giving your estimate of 34. However the graph is probably decreasing at a decreasing rate, implying a somewhat greater decline between 5 and 7 that would be implied by a straight-line approximation. A better estimate might be f(7) = 32 or 33. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:24 what is your estimate of the difference between f(7) and f(9)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 5

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:29 ** If f(7) = 32 and f(9) = 27, not unreasonable estimates, then the difference is 5. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:39 what is your estimate of the difference in x values between the points where f(x) = 70 and where f(x) = 30?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 6

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:37:43 ** f(x) will be 70 somewhere around x = 3 and f(x) will be 30 somewhere around x = 8 or 9. The difference in these x values is about 5 or 6. On your graph you could draw horizontal lines at y = 70 and at y = 30. You could then project these lines down to the x axis. The distance between these projection lines, which again should probably be around 5 or 6, can be estimated by the scale of the graph. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:38:17 query #4. temperature vs. clock time function y = temperature = T(t), what is the symbolic expression for ...

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> [T(5)+T(3)] / 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:38:28 ** STUDENT SOLUTION WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The temperature at time t = 3; T(3)The temperature at time t = 5; T(5) The change in temperature between t = 3 and t = 5; T(3) - T(5) The order of the expressions is important. For example the change between 30 degrees and 80 degrees is 80 deg - 30 deg = 50 degrees; the change between 90 degrees and 20 degrees is 20 deg - 90 deg = -70 deg. The change between T(3) and T(5) is T(5) - T(3). When we specify the change in a quantity we subtract the earlier value from the later. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: To average two numbers you add them and divide by 2. The average of the temperatures at t = 3 and t = 5 is therefore [T(3) + T(5)] /2 **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:40:46 What equation would we solve to find the clock time when the model predicts a temperature of 150? How would we find the length of time required for the temperature to fall from 80 to 30?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> First solve the equation T(t) = 150. Then solve the equation T(t) = 80. Subract the smaller t from the larger T. [ value of t at T(t) = 30] - [ value of t at T(t) = 80)]

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:40:50 ** GOOD STUDENT SOLUTION: To find the clock time when the model predicts a temperature of 150 we would solve the equation T(t) = 150. To find the length of time required for the temperature to fall from 80 to 30 we would first solve the equation T(t) = 80 to get the clock time at 80 degrees then find the t value or clok time when T(t) = 30. Then we could subtract the smaller t value from the larger t value to get the answer. [ value of t at T(t) = 30] - [ value of t at T(t) = 80)] **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:42:33 query. use the f(x) notation at every opportunity:For how long was the depth between 34 and 47 centimeters?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> First solve f(t) = 34 to get t1 and f(t) = 47 to get t2 Then find the absolute value for (t2-t1)

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:42:37 ** If depth = f(t) then you would solve f(t) = 34 to obtain t1 and f(t) = 47 to obtain t2. Then you would find abs(t2-t1). We use the absolute value because we don't know which is greater, t1 or t2, and the questions was 'how long' rather than 'what is the change in clock time ... ' **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:43:18 By how much did the depth change between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 - 60.8 = -10.2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:43:27 ** This would be f(34) - f(23). If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 and f(23) = 60.8 so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 - 60.8 = -10.2. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:44:49 On the average, how many seconds did it take for the depth to change by 1 centimeter between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ] 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ] = 11 s / (-10.2 cm) = -1.08 sec / cm depth decreases by 1 cm in 1.08 seconds

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:44:54 ** Change in depth would be f(34) - f(23). Change in t would be 34 s - 23 s = 11 s. Thus change in t / change in depth = 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ]. If f(t) gives depth in cm this result will be in seconds / centimeter, the ave number of seconds required for depth to change by 1 cm. If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, f(t) in cm, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 cm and f(23) = 60.8 cm so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 cm - 60.8 cm = -10.2 cm so that 11 s / [ f(34) - f(23) ] = 11 s / (-10.2 cm) = -1.08 sec / cm, indicating that depth decreases by 1 cm in 1.08 seconds. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:46:38 On the average, how by many centimeters did the depth change per second between t = 23 seconds and t = 34 seconds?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s) [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s) = (-10.2 cm) / (11 s) = -.92 cm / sec depth decreases by -.92 cm in 1 sec

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:46:41 ** Change in depth would be f(34) - f(23). Change in t would be 34 s - 23 s = 11 s. Thus change in depth / change in t = [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s). If f(t) gives depth in cm this result will be in centimeters / second, the ave number of centimeters of depth change during each second. If for example if your model was f(t) = .01 t^2 - 1.5 t + 90, f(t) in cm, you would find that f(34) = 50.6 cm and f(23) = 60.8 cm so f(34) - f(23) = 50.6 cm - 60.8 cm = -10.2 cm so that [ f(34) - f(23) ] / (11 s) = (-10.2 cm) / (11 s) = -.92 cm / sec, indicating that between t = 23 sec and t = 34 sec depth decreases by -.92 cm in 1 sec, on the average. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:20:42 query. A hypothetical depth vs. time model based on three points, none of which are actual data points. Describe how you constructed your graph.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I made a graph using a random set of data vs time with the points: (5.3, 63.7) (10.6, 54.8) (15.9, 46) (21.2, 37.7) (26.5, 32) (31.8, 26.6)

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:20:50 ** STUDENT RESPONSE: I sketched a graph using the depth vs. time data:(0, 96), (10, 89), (20, 68), (30, 65), (40, 48), (50, 49), (60, 36), & (70, 41). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> Ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:22:27 What 3 data point did you use as a basis for your model?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I used the points (5.3, 63.7), (15.9, 46), and (26.5, 32)

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:22:32 ** STUDENT RESPONSE: After drawing a curved line through the scatter data I placed 3 dots on the graph at aproximately equal intervals. I obtained the x and y locations form the axis, thier locations were at points (4,93), (24, 68) & (60, 41). I used these 3 data points as a basis for obtaining the model equation.**

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:49:06 What was your function model?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> y = (.016)x^2 + 2.02x - 33.06

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:49:18 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: The function model obtained from points (4, 93), (24, 68), & (60, 41) is depth(t) = .0089x^2 - 1.4992x + 98.8544. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:49:41 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: The function model obtained from points (4, 93), (24, 68), & (60, 41) is depth(t) = .0089x^2 - 1.4992x + 98.8544. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> i should have used 'depth' instead of y

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:56:12 What is the average deviation for your model?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> i don't completely understand the deviation process. i will look in my notes some more

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:56:20 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: I added a column 2 columns to the chart given in our assignment one labeled 'Model data' and the other 'Deviation'. I then subtracted the model data readings from the corresponding given data to get the individual deviations. I then averaged out the numbers in the deviation column. The average deviation turned out to be 3.880975.**

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:57:01 How close is your model to the curve you sketched earlier?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> it is fairly similar. i wasn't quite expecting that.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:57:09 ** STUDENT RESPONSE CONTINUED: I was really suprised at how close the model curve matched the curve that I had sketched earlier. It was very close.**

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

14:58:03 Query Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I found it very interesting how Using two completely different sets of data came close to making the same graph

.................................................

"

Good work and good insight. Let me know if you have questions.