#$&*
PHY 241
Your 'cq_1_00.1' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** **
This is a 'seed' question. The purpose and the process of answering 'seed' questions:
In cloud seeding small crystalline particles (the 'seeds') are scattered throughout a cloud, so that water vapor in the cloud will build up on the 'seed' and eventually fall in the form of rain.
These questions are posed without any previous explanation. You are expected to use what you already know, along with common sense, to answer the questions. It is standard practice in many courses to an instructor to give explanations and examples before asking students to answer questions, and you will see plenty of examples and explanations in this course. However the goal here is to first experience and think about a situation. Whether you think correctly or incorrectly, your thinking gets you started on an idea and forms a 'seed' on which understanding can accumulate.
You are expected to answer it to the best of your ability, based on what you know at the beginning of this assignment.
You are not expected to research this question until after you have submitted your best response.
You are not penalized based on whether your answer is 'right' or 'wrong', but you are expected to think as clearly and deeply as you can about the question.
You are not, however, expected to spend hours thinking about the question or agonize unduly about your answers. A rule of thumb is to give it up to 20 minutes, half for thinking and half for typing in your answers (maybe a little more for the typing if you don't have good keyboard skills).
This is the very first of the 'seed' questions so this one will probably take you a bit longer, especially since you have to read all these instructions and explanations before you get to the actual questions, and also because this one includes some videos, and because you aren't yet familiar with the process.
Your answers should consist of your best attempt at a solution, and/or one or more questions about the situation.
If you think you know the answer or can make a reasonable attempt to answer, then give your answer along with a concise outline of your reasoning.
If you aren't sure what the question is asking, make your best attempt to interpret and answer it, and consider including one or more questions.
If you are very sure you don't know what the question is asking, then break it down phrase-by-phrase or even word-by-word and explain what you think each key phrase or word might mean.
A question consists of a complete but concise statement of what you do and do not understand about the situation.
There are two ways you can spend an excessive amount of time explaining your solutions and/or asking questions. One is to type a lot more than what is necessary, and another is to spend a lot of time worrying about what is and is not necessary. Balance the two in the way that works best for you.
Remember that the 'concise' part is more for your benefit than mine. I can read a lot more quickly than you can type, and don't mind reading through a lot of words to understand your meaning.
You are invited but not required to include comments and/or discussion.
You are welcome to use reasonable abbreviations in your work.
Copy the problem below into a text editor or word processor.
This form accepts only text so a text editor such as Notepad is fine.
Include the text of the entire problem, starting with the words 'The Problem:'.
You might prefer for your own reasons to use a word processor (for example the formatting features might help you organize your answer and explanations), but note that formatting will be lost when you submit your work through the form.
If you use a word processor avoid using special characters or symbols, which would require more of your time to create and will not be represented correctly by the form.
As you will see within the first few assignments, there is an easily-learned keyboard-based shorthand that doesn't look quite as pretty as word-processor symbols, but which gets the job done much more efficiently.
You should enter your answers into this copy using the text editor or word processor. Enter your response to each question following the answer/question/discussion (start in the next line):
prompt.
You will then copy-and-paste the document, which will include the questions and your answers, into the box below, and submit.
The videos
There are four short videos, all of the same system. The smaller files are around 500 kB and will download faster than the larger files, which are about 4 times that size (about 2 mB or 2000 kB), but the larger files are a bit better in quality. If you have a fast connection any of these files should download fairly quickly. Video 1 and Video 2 probably contain the best information; Video 4 is the shortest.
The quality of these videos is not that great, and that is deliberate. These are medium-definition videos, taken with a camera that doesn't have a particularly high shutter speed. It's not important here to even know what a shutter speed is, but the effect of the slow shutter speed is to cause images of moving objects to be blurry.
All data in any science is in effect 'blurry'--there are limits to the precision of our measurements--and we start off the course with images that have obvious imperfections. We will later use images made with a high-definition camera with a fast shutter, where imperfections, though still present, are difficult to detect.
Video 1 (smaller file) Video 1 (larger file)
Video 2 (smaller file) Video 2 (larger file)
Video 3 (smaller file) Video 3 (larger file)
Video 4 (smaller file) Video 4 (larger file)
View these videos of a white roll of tape rolling down an incline next to a dark swinging pendulum, using Windows Media Player or a commercial media player. By alternately clicking the 'play' and 'pause' buttons you will be able to observe a series of positions and clock times.
The measuring tape in the video may be difficult to read, but it is a standard measuring tape marked in feet and inches. At the 1-foot mark, a little to the left of the center of the screen, there is a black mark on the tape. If you want to read positions but can't read the inches you can count them to the right and left of this mark. You can estimate fractions of an inch. You don't need to write anything down; just take a good look.
Begin by forming an opinion of the following questions; for the moment you may ignore the computer screen in the video. You don't have to write anything down at this point; just play with the videos for a couple of minutes and see what you think:
Is the tape speeding up or slowing down?
Is the pendulum speeding up or slowing down?
Which speeds up faster, the tape or the pendulum?
What is going to limit your ability to precisely measure the positions of these objects?
The computer in the video displays the running 'clock time', which is accurate to within something like .01 second. Think about how the information on this screen can help answer the above questions.
You don't have to think about the following right now, so I'm going to make it easy to ignore by putting it into small type. There is a parallax issue here. You don't even have to know what this means. But if you do, and if you want the information, here it is:
The measuring tape is pretty much parallel to the paths of the pendulum and the tape roll, about 5 inches further from the camera than the path of the pendulum, and the path of the ball is about halfway between the two. The camera is about 5 feet away from the system.
The problem:
You don't have to actually do so, but it should be clear that if you wished to do so, you could take several observations of positions and clock times. The main point here is to think about how you would use that information if you did go to the trouble of collecting it. However, most students do not answer these questions in terms of position and clock time information. Some students do not pause the video as instructed. To be sure you are thinking in terms of positions and clock times, please take a minute to do the following, which should not take you more than a couple of minutes:
Pick one of the videos, and write down the position and clock time of one of the objects, as best you can determine them, in each of three different frames. The three frames should all depict the same 'roll' down the ramp, i.e. the same video clip, at three different clock times. They should not include information from two or more different video clips.
For each of the three readings, simply write down the clock time as it appears on the computer screen, and the position of the object along the meter stick. You can choose either object (i.e., either the pendulum or the roll of tape), but use the same object for all three measurements. Do not go to a lot of trouble to estimate the position with great accuracy. Just make the best estimates you can in a couple of minutes.
Which object did you choose and what were the three positions and the three clock times?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
59.468 5 pendelum
59.796 13
60.015 17.5
#$&*
In the following you don't have to actually do calculations with your actual data. Simply explain how you would use data of this nature if you had a series of several position vs. clock time observations:
If you did use observations of positions and clock times from this video, how accurately do you think you could determine the positions, and how accurately do you think you would know the clock times? Give a reasonable numerical answer to this question (e.g., positions within 1 meter, within 2 centimeters, within 3 inches, etc; clock times within 3 seconds, or within .002 seconds, or within .4 seconds, etc.). You should include an explanations of the basis for your estimate: Why did you make the estimate you did?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
position - 1/2, because the pendelum is think and the measuring tape is further away. when the video is paused the inch marks are still defined, but the more precise marks on the tape measure are hard to make out. To be sure I estimated it's position correctly, I would have a 1/2 error either way.
clock times .001, because even when the video is stopped, the clock is still well-defined, unless the stick used to prop up the pendelum and tape at the beginning of the video gets in the way of the viewer and the clock time. At the three instances I stopped the clock time, I was able to make out the time to the nearest .001.
#$&*
How can you use observations of position and clock time to determine whether the tape rolling along an incline is speeding up or slowing down?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
Find the rate the tape is moving along the incline by dividing the distance by the time it took to get there.
#$&*
How can you use observations of position and clock time to determine whether the swinging pendulum is speeding up or slowing down?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
Find the rate the pendelum is swinging by dividing the distance the pendelum swung between each paused position, by the amount of time it took to get there.
#$&*
Challenge (University Physics students should attempt answer Challenge questions; Principles of Physics and General College Physics may do so but it is optional for these students): It is obvious that a pendulum swinging back and forth speeds up at times, and slows down at times. How could you determine, by measuring positions and clock times, at what location a swinging pendulum starts slowing down?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
When the rate of change is less than it was at the postion before, you can determine to a certain level of precision the exact location the pendelum began to slow down. By stopping te video 3 times, the level of precision is small, but after analyzing the same video and taking notes at very close intervals, you can determine the rate at each position and therefore the point at which the pendelum begins to slow down.
#$&*
Challenge (University Physics students should attempt answer Challenge questions; Principles of Physics and General College Physics may do so but it is optional for these students): How could you use your observations to determine whether the rate at which the tape is speeding up is constant, increasing or decreasing?
answer/question/discussion: ->->->->->->->->->->->-> (start in the next line):
The same as the previous question. Find the rate by dividing the distance traveled by time at multiple intervals in the video.
#$&*
Check to see that you have followed the instructions:
The instructions told you to pause the video multiple times. It appears that some students are not following this instruction.
If you haven't used the 'pause' and 'play' buttons on your media player, you should go back and do so.
The questions are phrased to ask not only what you see when you play the video, but what you see when you pause the video as instructed, and what you think you could determine if you were to actually take data from the video. You aren't asked to actually take the data, but you need to answer how you would use it if you did.
It's OK if you have given more general descriptions, which are certainly relevant. But answers to the questions should include an explanation of how you could use the series of position and clock time observations that are may be observed with this video.
The questions also ask how much uncertainty there would be in the positions and clock times observable with this specific video. Different people will have different answers, and some reasonable answers might vary from one clip to the next, or from one part of a clip to another. However the answers should include a reasonable quantitative estimate (i.e., numbers to represent the uncertainty; e.g., .004 seconds of uncertainty in clock times, 2 inches in position measurements. Use your own estimates; neither of these example values is necessarily reasonable for this situation). You should also explain the basis for your estimate: why did you make the estimate you did?
You should have estimated the number of seconds or fraction of a second to within which you think the time displayed on the computer screen might be accurate (e.g., is it accurate to within 10 seconds of the actual clock time, or to within 1 second, within .1 second, maybe even within .01 or .001 second). You might not yet know enough about the TIMER to give an accurate answer, but give the best answer you can.
You should also indicate a reasonable estimate of the number of inches or fraction of an inch to within which you could, if asked, determine the position of each object.
Copy and paste your work into the box below and submit as indicated:
Your instructor is trying to gauge the typical time spent by students on these questions. Please answer the following question as accurately as you can, understanding that your answer will be used only for the stated purpose and has no bearing on your grades:
Approximately how much time did you spend on this question?
45 minutes
You may add optional comments and/or questions in the box below.
** **
45 minutes
** **
self-critique rating
rating #$&*:
&#See any notes I might have inserted into your document, and before looking at the link below see if you can modify your solutions. If there are no notes, this does not mean that your solution is completely correct.
Then please compare your old and new solutions with the expanded discussion at the link
Solution
Self-critique your solutions, if this is necessary, according to the usual criteria. Insert any revisions, questions, etc. into a copy of this posted document. Mark any insertions with &&&& so they can be easily identified.If your solution is completely consistent with the given solution, you need do nothing further with this problem. &#
#$&*
&#Good responses. Let me know if you have questions. &#