Querry 12

course mth 272

3/6 @ 11:30

your solution to a stated problem does not match the given solution, you should self-critique per instructions at

http://vhcc2.vhcc.edu/dsmith/geninfo/labrynth_created_fall_05/levl1_22/levl2_81/file3_259.htm.

Your solution, attempt at solution: If you are unable to attempt a solution, give a phrase-by-phrase interpretation of the problem along with a statement of what you do or do not understand about it. This response should be given, based on the work you did in completing the assignment, before you look at the given solution.

012. `query 12

*********************************************

Question: `q5.6.26 (was 5.6.24 trap rule n=4, `sqrt(x-1) / x on [1,5]

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

5-1 / 4 = 4 / 4 = 1

intervals of [1, 2] [2, 3] [3, 4] [4, 5]

f(1) = sqrt(1-1) / 1 = 0

f(2) = sqrt(2-1) / 2 = 0.5

f(3) = sqrt(3-1) / 3 = 0.4714

f(4) = sqrt(4-1) / 4 = 0.4330

f(5) = sqrt(5-1) / 5 = 0.400

5 – 1 / 2*4 = 4 / 8 = 1 / 2

1 / 2(0 + .5) = 0.25

1 / 2(.5 + 0.4714) = 0.4857

1 / 2(0.4714 + 0.433) = 0.4522

1 / 2(0.4330 + 0.400) = 0.4165

[0.25 + 0.4857 + 00.4522 + 0.4165] = 1.6044

Confidence rating #$&*:2

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a Dividing [1, 5] into four intervals each will have length ( 5 - 1 ) / 4 = 1. The four intervals are therefore

[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4], [4,5].

The function values at the endpoints f(1) = 0, f(2) = .5, f(3) = .471, f(4) = .433 and f(5) = .4. The average altitudes of the trapezoids are therefore

(0 + .5) / 2 = 0.25, (.5 + .471)/2 = 0.486, (.471 + .433) / 2 = 0.452 and (.433 + .4) / 2 = 0.417.

Trapeoid areas are equal to ave height * width; since the width of each is 1 the areas will match the average heights 0.25, 0.486, 0.452, 0.417.

The sum of these areas is the trapezoidal approximation 1.604. **

DER

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating #$&*:

*********************************************

Question: `q5.6.32 (was 5.6.24 est pond area by trap and midpt (20 ft intervals, widths 50, 54, 82, 82, 73, 75, 80 ft).

How can you tell from the shape of the point whether the trapezoidal or midpoint estimate will be greater?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

1 / 2(0 + 50) = 25 ft

1 /2(50 + 54) = 52 ft

1 / 2(54 + 82) = 68 ft

1 / 2(82 + 82) = 82 ft

1 / 2(82 + 73) = 77.5 ft

1 / 2(73 + 75) = 74 ft

1 / 2(75 + 80) = 77.5 ft

1 / 2(80 + 0) = 40 ft

all area is in ft^2

25 * 20 = 500

52 * 20 = 1040

68 * 20 = 1360

82 * 20 = 1640

77.5 * 20 = 1550

74 * 20 = 1480

77.5 * 20 = 1550

80 * 20 = 1600

sum of all the areas = 9170

area by trapezoidal rule = 20[25 + 52 + 68 + 82 + 77.5 + 74 + 77.5 + 40]

= 20[496]

= 9,920 ft^2

MIDPOINT RULE

[0, 20] [20, 40] [40, 60] [60, 80] [80, 100] [100, 120] [120, 140] [140, 160]

midpoints = 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130, 150

area by midpoint rule = 20[10 +30 + 50 + 70 + 90 + 110 + 130 + 150]

= 20[640]

= 12,800 ft^2

The midpoint rule has a higher estimate surface area due to that the midpoint rule uses rectangles to estimate.

12,800 – 9,920 = 2,880 ft^2 greater

Confidence rating #$&*:2

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a Since widths at 20-ft intervals are 50, 54, 82, 82, 73, 75, 80 ft the pond area can be approximated by a series of trapezoids with these altitudes. The average altitudes are therefore respectively

(0 + 50 / 2) = 25

(50 + 54) / 2 = 52

(54 + 82) / 2 = 68

(82 + 82) / 2 = 82

etc., with corresponding areas

25 * 20 = 500

52 * 20 = 1040

etc., all areas in ft^2.

The total area, according to the trapezoidal approximation, will therefore be

20 ft (25+52+68+82+77.5+74+77.5+40) ft = 9920 square feet.

The midpoint widths would be calculated based on widths at positions 10, 30, 50, 70, ..., 150 ft. Due to the convex shape of the pond these estimates and will lie between the estimates made at 0, 20, 40, ..., 160 feet.

The convex shape of the pond also ensures that the midpoint of each rectangle will 'hump above' the trapezoidal approximation, so the midpoint estimate will exceed the trapezoidal estimate. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating #$&*:

*********************************************

Question: `q Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

??????????Found it fun that the sums of the area did not equal the area by the trapezoidal rule

Right. The trapezoidal rule is usually a good approximation, but is only an approximation.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating #$&*:

"

&#This looks good. See my notes. Let me know if you have any questions. &#

#$&*