Asst_35_QA

course PHY 201

oÿûëUèþ…ÁÊ]ÌÓ󷾤©ýÍÜd­Žƒ˜¾¯Áassignment #035

035. Velocity and Energy in SHM

Physics II

05-07-2008

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:52:56

`q001. Note that this assignment contains 5 questions.

At its maximum velocity, a simple harmonic oscillator matches the speed of the point moving around its reference circle. What is the maximum velocity of a pendulum 20 cm long whose amplitude of oscillation is 20 cm? Note that the radius of the reference circle is equal to the amplitude of oscillation.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Period of the pendulum is:

2`pi * sqrt(.2 m / 9.8 m/s^2) = .8976 s

The circumferece of the ref. circle is:

40 cm * pi = 125.66 cm

Ave velocity = 125.66 cm / .8976 s = 140.0 cm / s

since the pendulum hits zero speed and max speed twice each per cycle:

v0 = 0

vAve = 140 cm/s

vf = v0 + 2*vAve = 280 cm/s

This would be true of an object or a point accelerating uniformly from rest along a straight line, or for that matter along the arc of a circle. However the reference-circle point has uniform speed, never speed 0, and the object which follows the x projection of the point is not uniformly accelerated.

The reference-circle point never slows down or speeds up. Its projection onto the x axis does, and that x projection has velocity 0 at the extreme points.

However you don't want to confuse the speed of the reference-circle point with that of the point on the x axis. The two are the same when the reference-circle point reaches the y axis--i.e., when its x coordinate is zero, when the object passes through equilibrium--but that's the only time.

The acceleration of the x-axis point is not uniform. Your reasoning with average velocity (which as pointed out above also confuses reference-circle motion with that of the x projection) is based on the assumption that it is. The equations of uniformly accelerated motion do not apply here.

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:07:00

We need to find the velocity of the point on the reference circle that models this motion. The reference circle will have a radius that matches the amplitude of oscillation, in this case 20 cm. The period of the oscillation is T = 2 `pi `sqrt( L / g ) = 2 `pi `sqrt( 20 cm / (980 cm/s^2) ) = .9 sec, approx..

Thus the point completes a revolution around the reference circle once every .9 sec. The circumference of the reference circle is 2 `pi r = 2 `pi * 20 cm = 126 cm, approx., so the point moves at an average speed of 126 cm / .9 sec = 140 cm/s.

Thus the maximum velocity of the pendulum must be 140 cm/s.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I don't really understand the principle here... Shouldn't the maximum velocity be:

2 x 140 cm/s = 280 cm/s?

Note added later: read my next comment before you address this problem. I think I might have figured this out in the next problem.

Thanks for the heads-up but I went ahead and addressed it here, just to be as clear as possible.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:13:25

`q002. If the 10 kg mass suspended from the 3000 N/m spring undergoes SHM with amplitude 3 cm, what is its maximum velocity?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

k = 3000 N/m

m = 10 kg

A = 3 cm

T (period) = 2 * pi * sqrt ( .03 m / 9.8 m/s^2) = .348 s

circumference = 6pi = 18.85 cm

18.85 cm / .348 s = 54.17 cm/s

54.17 cm/s * 2 = 108.34 cm/s

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:18:06

We previously found the angular frequency and then the period of this system, obtaining period of oscillation T = .36 second. The reference circle will have radius 3 cm, so its circumference is 2 `pi * 3 cm = 19 cm, approx..

Traveling 19 cm in .36 sec the speed of the point on the reference circle is approximately 19 cm / (.36 sec) = 55 cm/s. This is the maximum velocity of the oscillator.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I totally don't understand this... I know that I must be wrong, but I just don't understand why.

Wait, is it because the velocity of the reference circle motion never changes.. Even when the actual object is stationary, the reference circle has an absolute value of A since the displacement of the object (y value) is high while the speed (x value) is low.

Is this the correct understanding?

Getting there. Think of the object as following the x projection--moving along the x axis along with the x coordinate of the reference-circle point. With this model, the y coordinate of the reference-circle point is not relevant. (You could, of course, choose instead to model the object by the y coordinate, in which case the x coordinate would not be relevant).

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:21:45

`q003. What is the KE of the oscillator at this speed?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I guess the KE would be:

.5mv^2 = .5*10kg*.542 m ^2 = 1.469 J

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:22:13

The KE is .5 m v^2 = .5 * 10 kg * (.55 m/s)^2 = 1.5 Joules, approx.. Note that this is the maximum KE of the oscillator.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

phew!

:-)

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:24:07

`q004. How much work is required to displace the mass 3 cm from its equilibrium position?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Fnet = kx = 3000 N/m * .03 m = 90 N

confidence assessment: 2

That's what you would get using the maximum force. But the work is based on the average force, which since the force is linear with respect to position is the average between the minimum force 0 and the maximum force. Thence the factor of 1/2.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:29:35

The mass rests at its equilibrium position so at that position there is no displacing force, since equilibrium is the position taken in the absence of displacing forces. As it is pulled from its equilibrium position more and more force is required, until at the 3 cm position the force is F = k x = 3000 N / m * .03 m = 90 N. (Note that F here is not the force exerted by the spring, but the force exerted against the spring to stretch it, so we use kx instead of -kx).

Thus the displacing force increases from 0 at equilibrium to 90 N at 3 cm from equilibrium, and the average force exerted over the 3 cm displacement is (0 N + 90 N ) / 2 = 45 N.

The work done by this force is `dW = F `dx = 45 N * .03 m = 1.5 Joules.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I can't seem to get my factors of two right! I understand why this is though, now that I see the answer.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:33:25

`q005. How does the work required to displace the mass 3 cm from its equilibrium position compare to the maximum KE of the oscillator, which occurs at its equilibrium position? How does this result illustrate the conservation of energy?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

In theory the max KE of the oscillator should occur at equilibrium, after gravity has done work on the object that is assisted by the opposite of the net force caused by k. IE k is releasing its PE and converting it to KE. KE and PE should be completely offsetting at all times just like the x and y of the reference circle.

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

00:33:59

Both results were 1.5 Joules.

The work required to displace the oscillator to its extreme position is equal to the maximum kinetic energy of the oscillator, which occurs at the equilibrium position. So 1.5 Joules of work must be done against the restoring force to move the oscillator from its equilibrium position to its extreme position. When released, the oscillator returns to its equilibrium position with that 1.5 Joules of energy in the form of kinetic energy.

Thus the work done against the restoring force is present at the extreme position in the form of potential energy, which is regained as the mass returns to its equilibrium position. This kinetic energy will then be progressively lost as the oscillator moves to its extreme position on the other side of equilibrium, at which point the system will again have 1.5 Joules of potential energy, and the cycle will continue. At every point between equilibrium and extreme position the total of the KE and the PE will in fact be 1.5 Joules, because whatever is lost by one form of energy is gained by the other.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

You're getting there. This takes a little sorting out, so be sure you see my notes.

&#

Let me know if you have questions. &#