Assignment 1 Query

#$&*

course MTH 158

1/23 4

001. `* 1 Question: * R.1.26 \ was R.1.14 (was R.1.6) Of the numbers in the set {-sqrt(2), pi + sqrt(2), 1 / 2 + 10.3} which are counting numbers, which are rational numbers, which are irrational numbers and which are real numbers?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

In the set the none of the numbers were counting numbers, ½ + 10.3 was the only rational number, -sqrt(2); pi + sqrt(2) were irrational numbers, and all the numbers are real numbers.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * ** Counting numbers are the numbers 1, 2, 3, .... . None of the given numbers are counting numbers

Rational numbers are numbers which can be expressed as the ratio of two integers. 1/2+10.3 are rational numbers.

Irrational numbers are numbers which can be expressed as the ratio of two integers. {-sqrt(2)}, pi+sqrt(2) are irrational numbers.. **

Self-critique (if necessary):

You didn’t list the real numbers but all of these numbers are real.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: 2

*********************************************

Question: * R.1.44 \ 32 (was R.1.24) Write in symbols: The product of 2 and x is the product of 4 and 6

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

To write the product of 2 and x is the product of 4 and 6 in symbols would look like this,

2x = 4 * 6, or 2x = 24

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * ** The product of 2 and x is 2 * x and the product of 4 and 6 is 4 * 6. To say that these are identical is to say that 2*x=4*6. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): OK

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: OK

*********************************************

Question:

* R.1.62 \ 50 (was R.1.42) Explain how you evaluate the expression 2 - 5 * 4 - [ 6 * ( 3 - 4) ]

Your solution:

In order to evaluate the expression 2 - 5 * 4 - [ 6 * ( 3 - 4) ] we follow the order of operations and do parentheses first. So we have 2 – 5 * 4 – [6 * (-1)]. Next we multiply from left to right and get 2 – 20 – [-6] Now we add and subtract from left to right. 2- 20 = -18 - -6 = -12

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * **Starting with

2-5*4-[6*(3-4)]. First you evaluate the innermost group to get

2-5*4-[6*-1] . Then multiply inside brackets to get

2-5*4+6. Then do the multiplication to get

2-20+6. Then add and subtract in order, obtaining

-12. **

* R.1.98 \ 80 (was R.1.72) Explain how you use the distributive property to remove the parentheses from the express (x-2)(x-4).

Your solution:

In order to get (x – 2)(x – 4) out of parenthesis we multiply out x(x – 4) – 2(x - 4) and arrive at x^2 – 4x -2x + 8. After simplifying we get x^2 – 6x + 8

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * ** COMMON ERROR: Using FOIL. FOIL is not the Distributive Law. FOIL works for binomial expressions. FOIL follows from the distributive law but is of extremely limited usefulness and the instructor does not recommend relying on FOIL.

Starting with

(x-2)(x-4) ; one application of the Distributive Property gives you

x(x-4) - 2(x-4) . Applying the property to both of the other terms we get

x^2 - 4x - (2x -8). Simplifying:

x^2 - 4x - 2x + 8 or

x^2 - 6x + 8. *

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): OK

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: OK

*********************************************

Question: * R.1.102 \ 86 (was R.1.78) Explain why (4+3) / (2+5) is not equal to 4/2 + 3/5.

Your solution:

In this expression it is understood that (4+3) and (2+5) are inseperable therefore you must do 4+3=7 and 2+3= 7 and get a final answer of 7/7 or 1.

confidence rating #$&*: 2

*********************************************

Question: * R.1.102 \ 86 (was R.1.78) Explain why (4+3) / (2+5) is not equal to 4/2 + 3/5.

Your solution:

In this expression it is understood that (4+3) and (2+5) are inseperable therefore you must do 4+3=7 and 2+3= 7 and get a final answer of 7/7 or 1.

confidence rating #$&*: 2

#(*!

&#This looks good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#