Assignment 13

#$&*

course MTH 158

013. `* 13

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.34 (was 1.5.24). How did you write the interval [0, 1) using an inequality with x? Describe your illustration using the number line.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

[0,1) = 0 ≤ x < 1

confidence rating #$&*: ok

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * My notes here show the half-closed interval [0, 1).

When sketching the graph you would use a filled dot at x = 0 and an unfilled dot at x = 1, and you would fill in the line from x = 0 to x = 1. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

I left out the description of the graph though I understand that this is the proper way in which to graph the material.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: 2

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.40 (was 1.5.30). How did you fill in the blank for 'if x < -4 then x + 4 ____ 0'?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

<

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * if x<-4 then x cannot be -4 and x+4 < 0.

Algebraically, adding 4 to both sides of x < -4 gives us x + 4 < 0. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: ok

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.46 (was 1.5.36). How did you fill in the blank for 'if x > -2 then -4x ____ 8'?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

<

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * if x> -2 then if we multiply both sides by -4 we get

-4x <8.

Recall that the inequality sign has to reverse if you multiply or divide by a negative quantity. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: ok

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.58 (was 1.5.48). Explain how you solved the inquality 2x + 5 >= 1.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

2x + 5 ≥ 1

2x ≥ -4

X ≥ -2

confidence rating #$&*: ok

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * Starting with

2x+5>= 1 we add -5 to both sides to get

2x>= -4, the divide both sides by 2 to get the solution

x >= -2. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): 3

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.64 (was 1.5.54). Explain how you solved the inquality 8 - 4(2-x) <= 2x.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

8 - 4(2 - x) ≤ -2x

8 - 8 + 4x ≤ -2x

4x ≤ -2x

2x ≤ 0

X ≤ 0

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * 8- 4(2-x)<= 2x. Using the distributive law:

8-8+4x<= 2x . Simplifying:

4x<=2x . Subtracting 2x from both sides:

2x<=0. Multiplying both sides by 1/2 we get

x<=-0 **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: ok

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.76 (was 1.5.66). Explain how you solved the inquality 0 < 1 - 1/3 x < 1.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

0 < 1 - 1/3 x < 1 0 < 1 - 1/3x and 1 - 1/3x < 1

0 < 1 - 1/3x

-1 < -1/3x

1/3 < x

And

1 - 1/3x < 1

1/3x < 0

X < 0

So 0 < x < 1/3

confidence rating #$&*: 2

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * Starting with

0<1- 1/3x<1 we can separate this into two inequalities, both of which must hold:

0< 1- 1/3x and 1- 1/3x < 1. Subtracting 1 from both sides we get

-1< -1/3x and -1/3x < 0. We solve these inequalitites separately:

-1 < -1/3 x can be multiplied by -3 to get 3 > x (multiplication by the negative reverses the direction of the inequality)

-1/3 x < 0 can be multiplied by -3 to get x > 0.

So our inequality can be written 3 > x > 0. This is not incorrect but we usually write such inequalities from left to right, as they would be seen on a number line. The same inequality is expressed as

0 < x < 3. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

I must have messed my signs up somewhere as I had 1/3 instead of -1/3 at the end of my computations. I knew to do the steps afterwards though.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:2

@& You got

-1 < -1/3x

Then you should have multiplied both sides by -3 to get

3 > x.

You did reverse the sign, but don't appear to have done the multiplication.*@

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.94 (was 1.5.84). Explain how you found a and b for the conditions 'if -3 < x < 3 then a < 1 - 2x < b.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

-3 < x < 3

6 > 2x > -6

7 > -2x + 1 > -5

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * Adding 1 to each expression gives us

1 + 6 > 1 - 2x > 1 - 6, which we simplify to get

7 > 1 - 2x > -5. Writing in the more traditional 'left-toright' order:

-5 < 1 - 2x < 7. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: ok

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.106 (was 1.5.96). Explain how you set up and solved an inequality for the problem. Include your inequality and the reasoning you used to develop the inequality. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) commision $25 + 40% of excess over owner cost; range is $70 to $300 over owner cost. What is range of commission on a sale?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The total pay of the salesperson would be represented by P. The percentage he makes over selling price is represented by s. Therefore when set up it would look similar to this whenever it is set up

P = .4s + 25 the range of commission will be between $105 and $1,225.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * If x = owner cost then

70 < x < 300.

.40 * owner cost is then in the range

.40 * 70 < .40 x < .40 * 300 and $25 + 40% of owner cost is in the range

25 + .40 * 70 < 25 + .40 x < 25 + .40 * 300 or

25 + 28 < 25 + .40 x < 25 + 120 or

53 < 25 + .40 x < 145. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

I did this problem completely wrong. I will look over the answer further and adjust my methods accordingly.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: 2

@& You had .4 s + 25, which is equivalent to 25 + .40 x in the given solution. From that point you needed only set and solve up the inequality.*@

*********************************************

Question: * 1.5.123 \ 112. Why does the inequality x^2 + 1 < -5 have no solution?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Because when we square both sides of the inequality we find that we must find the square root of -5 which isn’t possible.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

* * STUDENT SOLUTION: x^2 +1 < -5

x^2 < -4

x < sqrt -4

can't take the sqrt of a negative number

INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Good.

Alternative: As soon as you got to the step x^2 < -4 you could have stated that there is no such x, since a square can't be negative. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating: ok

@& Right, but you're taking the square root of both sides, not squaring both sides.*@

"

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

"

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

#*&!

&#Good work. See my notes and let me know if you have questions. &#