Assign 3

course Phy 232

I need work on this!

}qassignment #003

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

003.

Physics II

03-01-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:20:14

In your own words explain the meaning of the electric field.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

direction and magnitude of an electrostatic force

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:20:26

STUDENT RESPONSE AND INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: electric field is the concentration of the electrical force

** That's a pretty good way to put it. Very specifically electric field measures the magnitude and direction of the electrical force, per unit of charge, that would be experienced by a charge placed at a given point. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

ԎǴ_

assignment #003

003.

Physics II

03-01-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:37:12

In your own words explain the meaning of the electric field.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

direction and magnitude of an electrostatic force

confidence assessment: 2

The force depends on how much charge is exposed to the field. The field is force per unit of charge.

' direction and magnitude of an electrostatic force, per unit of charge experiencing the field' would be close to the definition.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:37:22

STUDENT RESPONSE AND INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: electric field is the concentration of the electrical force

** That's a pretty good way to put it. Very specifically electric field measures the magnitude and direction of the electrical force, per unit of charge, that would be experienced by a charge placed at a given point. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:53:41

Query Principles of Physics and General Physics problem 16.15 charges 6 microC on diagonal corners, -6 microC on other diagonal corners of 1 m square; force on each.

What is the magnitude and direction of the force on the positive charge at the lower left-hand corner?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

two adjacent forces (@ 1m away) are opposite so attract

[(9 x 10^9) * .000006 * .000006]/1^2 = .324

diagonal force (@ 1.414m away) is same so repel

[(9 x 10^9) * .000006 * .000006]/1.414^2 = .162

diagonal force is at 225 degrees

therefore, the total force in the X direction is .324 + (.162 * sin(225)) = .324 - .115 = .209

total force in the Y direction is .324 + (.162 * cos(225)) = .324 - .115 = .209

The force has a total of sqrt((.209^2) + (.209^2)) = .296 in the direction of arctan(.209/.209) = arctan(1) = +45 degrees

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:53:49

** The charges which lie 1 meter apart are unlike and therefore exert attractive forces; these forces are each .324 Newtons. This is calculated using Coulomb's Law: F = 9 * 10^9 N m^2/C^2 * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) / ( 1 m)^2 = 324 * 10^-3 N = .324 N.

Charges across a diagonal are like and separated by `sqrt(2) meters = 1.414 meters, approx, and exert repulsive forces of .162 Newtons. This repulsive force is calculated using Coulomb's Law: F = 9 * 10^9 N m^2/C^2 * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) * ( 6* 10^-6 C) / ( 1.414 m)^2 = 162 * 10^-3 N = .162 N.

The charge at the lower left-hand corner therefore experiences a force of .324 Newtons to the right, a force of .324 Newtons straight upward and a force of .162 Newtons at 45 deg down and to the left (at angle 225 deg with respect to the standard positive x axis, which we take as directed toward the right).

This latter force has components Fy = .162 N sin(225 deg) = -.115 N, approx, and Fx = .162 N cos(225 deg) = -.115 N.

The total force in the x direction is therefore -.115 N + .324 N = .21 N, approx; the total force in the y direction is -.115 N + .324 N = .21 N, approx.

Thus the net force has magnitude `sqrt( (.21 N)^2 + (.21 N)^2) = .29 N at an angle of tan^-1( .21 N / .21 N) = tan^-1(1) = 45 deg.

The magnitude and direction of the force on the negative charge at the lower right-hand corner is obtained by a similar analysis, which would show that this charge experiences forces of .324 N to the left, .324 N straight up, and .162 N down and to the right. The net force is found by standard vector methods to be about .29 N up and to the left. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok!!!

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:31:15

query university physics 21.68 (22.52 10th edition) 5 nC at the origin, -2 nC at (4 cm, 0).

If 6 nC are placed at (4cm, 3cm), what are the components of the resulting force?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

the force of the 5 nC on the 6 nC is

[(9 x 10^9) * 5 nC * 6 nC] / 5^2 = .011 microN at the direction tan(3/4) = 36.9 degrees

vector with x component .011 * cos(36.9) = .0088

y component .011 * sin(36.9) = .0066

the force of the -2 nC on the 6 nC is

[(9 x 10^9) * -2 nC * 6 nC] / 3^2 = .012 microN

directly down

the resultant has x component .0088 microN and y component (.0066 - .012) = -.0054 microN

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:32:04

** The 5 nC charge lies at distance sqrt( 4^2 + 3^2) cm from the 6 nC charge, which is 3 cm from the charge at (4 cm ,0).

The force exerted on the 6 nC charge by the two respective forces have magnitudes .00011 N and .00012 N respectively.

The x and y components of the force exerted by the charge at the origin are in the proportions 4/5 and 3/5 to the total charge, giving respective components .000086 N and .000065 N.

The force exerted by the charge at (4 cm, 0) is in the negative y direction.

So the y component of the resultant are .000065 N - .00012 N = -.000055 N and its x component is .000086 N. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

It looks like my digits are close, but I have an extra power of 10 in there? I'm assuming the minor difference is the trig functions.

self critique assessment: 1

The significant-figure discrepancy migth be due to mixing of units. k has units of N m^2 / C^2, whereas the distance you use in your calculation has units of cm. This is why it's important to do all unit calculations. Your denominator was expressed without units, so the discrepancy was not readily apparent.

For example,

[(9 x 10^9) N m^2 / C^2 * 5 nC * 6 nC] / (.05 m)^2 = 2.7 * 10^-7 N m^2 / (.0025 m^2) = 1.1 * 10^-4 N, or .00011 N.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:42:45

Query univ phy 21.76 (10th edition 22.60) quadrupole (q at (0,a), (0, -a), -2q at origin).

For y > a what is the magnitude and direction of the electric field at (0, y)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

all the charges are on the y axis.

magnitude of each is k * q / r^2

so combined we have:

|q charge @ a| + |q charge @ origin| + |q charge @ -a|

[k*q/(y-a)^2] + [k*q/(y+a)^2] + [-(k*2q/y^2)]

direction is away from origin

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:43:19

** The magnitude of the field due to the charge at a point is k q / r^2.

For a point at coordinate y on the y axis, for y > a, we have distances r = y-a, y+a and y.

The charges at these distances are respectively q, q and -2q.

So the field is

k*q/(y - a)^2 + k*q/(y + a)^2 - 2k*q/y^2 = 2*k*q*(y^2 + a^2)/((y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) - 2*k*q/y^2

= 2*k*q* [(y^2 + a^2)* y^2 - (y+a)^2 ( y-a)^2) ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2)

= 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - (y^2 - a^2)^2 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2)

= 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - y^4 + 2 y^2 a^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [ 3 a^2 y^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) .

For large y the denominator is close to y^6 and the a^4 in the numerator is insignifant compared to a^2 y^2 sothe expression becomes

6 k q a^2 / y^4,

which is inversely proportional to y^4. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I don't see anything about the direction.

self critique assessment: 2

That should have been mentioned.

The direction is that of the y axis. In the expression

k*q/(y - a)^2 + k*q/(y + a)^2 - 2k*q/y^2

the forces due to the positive charges are positive at points above the origin, and forces due to negative charges are negative.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:48:47

query univ 22.102 annulus in yz plane inner radius R1 outer R2, charge density `sigma.What is a total electric charge on the annulus?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

total electric charge is found using the product:

area of ring * sigma

(pi R2^2 - pi R1^2) * sigma

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:48:53

** The total charge on the annulus is the product

Q = sigma * A = sigma * (pi R2^2 - pi R1^2).

To find the field at distance x along the x axis, due to the charge in the annulus, we first find the field due to a thin ring of charge:

The charge in a thin ring of radius r and ring thickness `dr is the product

`dQ = 2 pi r `dr * sigma

of ring area and area density.

From any small segment of this ring the electric field at a point of the x axis would be directed at angle arctan( r / x ) with respect to the x axis. By either formal trigonometry or similar triangles we see that the component parallel to the x axis will be in the proportion x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) to the magnitude of the field from this small segment.

By symmetry only the xcomponent of the field will remain when we sum over the entire ring.

So the field due to the ring will be in the same proportion to the expression k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2).

Thus the field due to this thin ring will be

magnitude of field due to thin ring: k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2) * x / sqrt (x^2 + r^2) = 2 pi k r `dr * x / (x^2 + r^2)^(3/2).

Summing over all such thin rings, which run from r = R1 to r = R2, we obtain the integral

magnitude of field = integral ( 2 pi k r x /(x^2 + r^2)^(3/2) with respect to r, from R1 to R2).

Evaluating the integral we find that

magnitude of field = 2* pi k *x* | 1 /sqrt(x^2 + r1^2) - 1 / sqrt(x^2 + r2^2) |

The direction of the field is along the x axis.

If the point is close to the origin then x is close to 0 and x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) is approximately equal to x / r, for any r much larger than x. This is because the derivative of x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) with respect to x is r^2 / (x^2+r^2)^(3/2), which for x = 0 is just 1/r, having no x dependence. So at small displacement `dx from the origin the field strength will just be some constant multiple of `dx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 1

.................................................

"

I recomend that you give a detailed self-critique on that last problem.

Otherwise your work looks good. See my notes.