Asst_3 Query

#$&*

course Phy 121

10/24 700It took me about 1.5 hrs to complete this assignment.

003. `Query 3

*********************************************

Question: What do the coordinates of two points on a graph of position vs. clock time tell

you about the motion of the object? What can you reason out once you have these

coordinates?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The coodinates give the clock time (xvalue) and position (yvalue) of two specific clock

times. Using these points I can calculate the slope of the graph by taking the vertical

change over the horizontal change. For this particular graph this would give me the

vAve, since change in position or 'ds / change in clocktime or 'dt is equal to vAve.

confidence rating #$&*:3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution: The coordinates a point on the graph include a position and a clock time,

which tells you where the object whose motion is represented by the graph is at a given

instant. If you have two points on the graph, you know the position and clock time at two

instants.

Given two points on a graph you can find the rise between the points and the run.

On a graph of position vs. clock time, the position is on the 'vertical' axis and the clock

time on the 'horizontal' axis.

The rise between two points represents the change in the 'vertical' coordinate, so in this

case the rise represents the change in position.

The run between two points represents the change in the 'horizontal' coordinate, so in this

case the run represents the change in clock time.

The slope between two points of a graph is the 'rise' from one point to the other, divided

by the 'run' between the same two points.

The slope of a position vs. clock time graph therefore represents rise / run = (change in

position) / (change in clock time).

By the definition of average velocity as the average rate of change of position with

respect to clock time, we see that average velocity is vAve = (change in position) /

(change in clock time).

Thus the slope of the position vs. clock time graph represents the average velocity for the

interval between the two graph points.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

Ok.

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question:

Pendulums of lengths 20 cm and 25 cm are counted for one minute. The counts are

respectively 69 and 61. To how many significant figures do we know the difference

between these counts?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your Solution:

1 significant figure. 69-61 = 8. However 69 assumes all the numbers between 68.5

and 69.5 as 61 assumes it lies between 60.5 and 61.5 counts. We know only for sure 1

significant figure. If 69.0 and 61.0 had been given, the answer would have still been

one but it would have been definite.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*********************************************

Question:

What are some possible units for position? What are some possible units for clock time?

What therefore are some possible units for rate of change of position with respect to

clock time?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your Solution:

Position could be m, km, in., mile, cm, mm, etc.

Clock time could be measured in millisec., seconds, minutes, hours, days, etc.

Units of rate could be m/sec, km/hr, cm/sec, sm/min.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*********************************************

Question: What fraction of the Earth's diameter is the greatest ocean depth?

What fraction of the Earth's diameter is the greatest mountain height (relative to sea

level)?

On a large globe 1 meter in diameter, how high would the mountain be, on the scale of

the globe? How might you construct a ridge of this height?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

I don't recall the depth of the earth's greatest ocean depth. However to find the fraction

of Earth's diameter it is, if I remembered the depth, I would take the depth, which is the

difference between the lowest point of the ocean floor and the surface of the ocean, say

x meters, and divide that by the total diameter of Earth to calculate the fraction of

Earth's total diameter the deepest trench is.

Mount Everest is tallest mountain relative to sea level, which is 8850m tall. Earth's

diameter is about 12,800km, or about 12,800,000m in diameter. To find the fraction

that Everest is to the Earth, I took 8850m / 12,800,000m or about 6.9*10^-4m.

On a globe 1m or 1000mm in diameter, Mount Everest would be about 0.69mm tall.

Adding a few strands of dental floss could probably give a ridge.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The greatest mountain height is a bit less than 10 000 meters. The diameter of the Earth

is a bit less than 13 000 kilometers.

Using the round figures 10 000 meters and 10 000 kilometers, we estimate that the ratio

is 10 000 meters / (10 000 kilometers). We could express 10 000 kilometers in meters,

or 10 000 meters in kilometers, to actually calculate the ratio. Or we can just see that the

ratio reduces to meters / kilometers. Since a kilometer is 1000 meters, the ratio is 1 /

1000.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

I don't see how you got the figures of 10000m and 10000km for Everest and Earth

repectively.

Are my calculations off?

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:3

@&

The given solution rounded 13 000 (which as stated is a little high for the diameter of the Earth in kilometers)down to 10 000 and also rounded 8850 to 10 000.

The given solution gave a very rough ballpark result. The height on the globe would be very roughly 1 millimeter. That's consistent with your result of 0.69 millimeter.

*@

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery Principles of Physics and General College Physics: Summarize your

solution to the following:

Find the sum

1.80 m + 142.5 cm + 5.34 * 10^5 `micro m

to the appropriate number of significant figures.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

1.80 m + 142.5 cm + 5.34 * 10^5 `micro m

= 1.80m + (142.5 cm * 10^-2) + [(5.34*10^5 'micro m) * 10^-6] m

= 1.80m + 1.425 m + .534 m

= 3.76 m

confidence rating #$&*:3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** 1.80 m has three significant figures (leading zeros don't count, neither to trailing

zeros unless there is a decimal point; however zeros which are listed after the decimal

point are significant; that's the only way we have of distinguishing, say, 1.80 meter (read

to the nearest .01 m, i.e., nearest cm) and 1.000 meter (read to the nearest millimeter).

Therefore no measurement smaller than .01 m can be distinguished.

142.5 cm is 1.425 m, good to within .00001 m.

5.34 * `micro m means 5.34 * 10^-6 m, so 5.34 * 10^5 micro m means (5.34 * 10^5) *

10^-6 meters = 5.34 + 10^-1 meter, or .534 meter, accurate to within .001 m.

Then theses are added you get 3.759 m; however the 1.80 m is only good to within .01

m so the result is 3.76 m. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

ok

*********************************************

Question: For University Physics students: Summarize your solution to Problem 1.31 (10th

edition 1.34) (4 km on line then 3.1 km after 45 deg turn by components, verify by

scaled sketch).

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** THE FOLLOWING CORRECT SOLUTION WAS GIVEN BY A STUDENT:

The components of vectors A (2.6km in the y direction) and B (4.0km in the x direction)

are known.

We find the components of vector C(of length 3.1km) by using the sin and cos functions.

Cx was 3.1 km * cos(45 deg) = 2.19. Adding the x component of the second vector,

4.0, we get 6.19km.

Cy was 2.19 and i added the 2.6 km y displacement of the first vector to get 4.79.

So Rx = 6.19 km and Ry = 4.79 km.

To get vector R, i used the pythagorean theorem to get the magnitude of vector R, which

was sqrt( (6.29 km)^2 + (4.79 km)^2 ) = 7.9 km.

The angle is theta = arctan(Ry / Rx) = arctan(4.79 / 6.19) = 37.7 degrees. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question:

A ball rolls from rest down a book, off that book and onto another book, where it picks

up additional speed before rolling off the end of that book.

Suppose you know all the following information:

How far the ball rolled along each book.

The time interval the ball requires to roll from one end of each book to the other.

How fast the ball is moving at each end of each book.

How would you use your information to determine the clock time at each of the three

points, if we assume the clock started when the ball was released at the 'top' of the first

book?

If I have v0 and vf as well the time interval to move the length of the book and the total

displacement, I could construct a graph to determine three points.

How would you use your information to sketch a graph of the ball's position vs. clock

time?

For a position vs. clock time graph, the starting displacement, 0cm, and final

displacement, sf, would be situated in relation to the vertical axis. Clock time, or t0 and

tf would be relative to the horizontal axis.

(This question is more challenging that the others): How would you use your information to

sketch a graph of the ball's speed vs. clock time, and how would this graph differ from

the graph of the position?

The points on the graph would be (t0, v0), (tf, vf). To find the midpoint, or average

acceleration, I would take [(tf/2), (vf/2)]. The line of the first graph would be vAve of

the ball. The line of the second graph would be the ball's acceleration.

confidence rating #$&*:3"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question:

A ball rolls from rest down a book, off that book and onto another book, where it picks

up additional speed before rolling off the end of that book.

Suppose you know all the following information:

How far the ball rolled along each book.

The time interval the ball requires to roll from one end of each book to the other.

How fast the ball is moving at each end of each book.

How would you use your information to determine the clock time at each of the three

points, if we assume the clock started when the ball was released at the 'top' of the first

book?

If I have v0 and vf as well the time interval to move the length of the book and the total

displacement, I could construct a graph to determine three points.

How would you use your information to sketch a graph of the ball's position vs. clock

time?

For a position vs. clock time graph, the starting displacement, 0cm, and final

displacement, sf, would be situated in relation to the vertical axis. Clock time, or t0 and

tf would be relative to the horizontal axis.

(This question is more challenging that the others): How would you use your information to

sketch a graph of the ball's speed vs. clock time, and how would this graph differ from

the graph of the position?

The points on the graph would be (t0, v0), (tf, vf). To find the midpoint, or average

acceleration, I would take [(tf/2), (vf/2)]. The line of the first graph would be vAve of

the ball. The line of the second graph would be the ball's acceleration.

confidence rating #$&*:3"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

#*&!

&#This looks very good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#

@&

I'm noting your time logs. It appears that you might be spending an average of about 8 hours per assignment.

This is not unusual in the early part of the course. Once students get by the initial phase of the course, the time per assignment typically decreases, though of course there are exceptions.

Having seen a good bit of your work, I can say that you are very capable of done high-level work in this course.

I suggest you prioritize your work as follows, in decreasing order of priority:

You definitely need to do the lab assignments.

You need to make sure you know how to do the problems in the Introductory Problem Sets.

The assignment-level quizzes end around Assignment 10. They are very important in that they address most of the topics covered on the Major Quiz.

The qa's are very important.

The 'seed' problems are also very useful, as they give me a picture of your thinking on problems that don't have answers provided.

The text, Class Notes and other supplementary materials should be used as appropriate to support the learning process. You should be familiar with these resources, but use only the ones you find helpful.

So the bottom line is:

At the minimum you should do the labs, know the Introductory Problem Sets and the assignment-level quizzes. This much would do a fairly good job of preparing you for the Major Quiz. After the Major Quiz, the key is to be able to do problems similar to those in the Introductory Problem Sets, since all subsequent tests are generated from those problem sets.

On the qa's I suggest you work through the problems but 'OK' those you have been able to solve without looking at the given solution, and those you are sure you understand after reading the given solution. When you have questions on a problem, you can use the self-critique. You should submit your solutions to the problems that don't have given solutions.

*@