Assignments 18 Query

course mth 163

???????????ff???~?assignment #018018. `query 18

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

Precalculus I

03-26-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:09:00

query Logarithms, Logarithmic Functions, Logarithmic Equations

1. For what value of x will the function y = log{base 2}(x) first reach 4

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

If we rewrite this :

4 = log base 2 (x) to find this:

x = log 4 * log 2

x = (.301)(.602)

x = .181

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:20:33

** ln(x) = 4 translates to x = e^4, which occurs at x = 55 approx.

ln(x) = 2 translates to x = e^2, which occurs at x = 7.4 approx.

ln(x) = 3 translates to x = e^3, which occurs at x = 20 approx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I was still thinking about the last assignment with logs. (Since this happens to be from assignment 17 & and part of last week's assignement was from 18). I think Assignments 17 & 18 querys are messed up...may want to check on that.

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:22:31

for what value of x will the function y = ln(x) first reach y = 4?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Is this not the same question?

ln (x) = 4

x = e^4

x = approximately 55

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:22:44

y = ln(x) means that e^y = x. The function y = ln(x) will first reach y = 4 when x = e^4 = 54.6 approx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:35:32

3. Explain why the negative y axis is an asymptote for a log{base b}(x) function

explain why this is so only if b > 1

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I honestly can't find this in the notes, or by looking at that one graph.

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:41:35

** the log{base b} function is the inverse of the y = b^x function. Assuming b > 1, large negative values of x lead to positive b^x values near zero, resulting in a horizontal asymptotes along the negative x axis.

When the columns are reversed we end up with small positive values of x associated with large negative y, resulting in a vertical asymptote along the negative y axis.

You can take a negative power of any positive b, greater than 1 or not.

For b > 1, larger negative powers make the result smaller, and the negative x axis is an asymptote.

For b < 1, larger positive powers make the result smaller, and the positive x axis becomes the asymptote. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

After reading this explaination, it does make sense. I just didn't see where this information was found.

self critique assessment: 1

This question would be reasoned out based on the original construction of the log graph, based on the values of the exponential function.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:48:23

5. What are your estimates for the values of b for the two exponential functions on the given graph?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

My estimates would have to be maybe 1 and 2?

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:51:00

** The exponential function y = A b^x has y intercept (0, A) and basic point (1, A * b).

Both graphs pass thru (0, 1) so A = 1.

The x = 1 points are (1, 3.5) and (1, 7.3) approx.. Thus for the first A * b = 3.5; since A = 1 we have b = 3.5. For the second we similarly conclude that b = 7.3.

So the functions are y = 3.5^x and y = 7.3^x, approx.. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I don't fully understand this one. I'll have to look back over this one.

self critique assessment: 1

Let me know if you still have questions on this one, and tell me specifically what you do and do not understand about the given explanation.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:09:46

7. What is the decibel level of a sound which is 10,000 times as loud as hearing threshold intensity?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I am still not following these questions.

As for the #7 question:

If I read the notes correctly:

log 10,000 = db

4 db

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:20:49

dB = 10 log(I / I0). If the sound is 10,000 times as loud as hearing threshold intensity then I / I0 = 10,000.

log(10,000) = 4, since 10^4 = 10,000.

So dB = 10 log(I / I0) = 10 * 4 = 40.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Ok, so I was on the right track. I didn't go quite to the right formula.

dB = 10 log(I / I0). I also see where I/I0 = 10,000 and where it would be substituted in as:

dB = 10 log(10,000)

dB = 10 * 4

dB = 40

self critique assessment: 2

Good.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:23:50

What are the decibel levels of sounds which are 100, 10,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 times louder than threshold intensity?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

dB = 10 log(I / I0)

dB = 10 log(100)

dB = 10 *2

dB = 20

dB = 10 log(10,000,000)

dB = 10 * 7

dB = 70

dB = 10 log(1,000,000,000)

dB = 10 * 9

dB = 90

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:23:57

10 log(100) = 10 * 2 = 20, so a sound which is 100 times hearing threshold intensity is a 20 dB sound.

10 log(10,000,000) = 10 * 7 = 70, so a sound which is 100 times hearing threshold intensity is a 70 dB sound.

10 log(1,000,000,000) = 10 * 9 = 90, so a sound which is 100 times hearing threshold intensity is a 90 dB sound.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:25:01

how can you easily find these decibel levels without using a calculator?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

count how many 0's are in the multiple of 10...that's the number (ex log 100 = 2)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:25:09

Since 10^1, 10^2, 10^3, ... are 10, 100, 1000, ..., the power of 10 is the number of zeros in the result. Since the log of a number is the power to which 10 must be raised to get this number, the log of one of these numbers is equal to the number of zeros.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:30:37

What are the decibel levels of sounds which are 500, 30,000,000 and 7,000,000,000 times louder than threshold intensity?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

dB = 10 log(500)

dB = 10 * 2.699

dB = 26.99

dB = 10 log(30,000,000)

dB = 10 * 7.477

dB = 74.77

dB = 10 log(7,000,000,000)

dB = 10 * 9.85

dB = 98.45

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:30:43

10 log(500) = 10 * 2.699 = 26.99 so this is a 26.99 dB sound.

10 log(30,000,000) = 10 * 7.477 = 74.77 so this is a 74.77 dB sound.

10 log(7,000,000,000) = 10 * 9.845 = 98.45 so this is a 98.45 dB sound.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:31:59

8. If a sound measures 40 decibels, then what is the intensity of the sound, as a multiple of the hearing threshold intensity?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

dB = 10 log(I/I0)

40 = 10 log (x)

4 = log x

x = 10000

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:32:04

** Let x be the ratio I / I0. Then we solve the equation 40= 10*log(x). You solve this by dividing by 10 to get

log(x) = 4 then translating this to exponential form

x = 10^4 = 10,000.

The sound is 10,000 times the hearing threshold intensity, so

I = 10,000 I0. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:34:42

Answer the same question for sounds measuring 20, 50, 80 and 100 decibels.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

dB = 10 log(100)

20 = 10 log (I/I0)

2 = log (I/I0)

100

50 = 10 log (I/I0)

5 = log (I/I0)

100,000

80 = 10 log (I/I0)

8 = log (I/I0)

100,000,000

100 = 10 log (I/I0)

10 = log (I/I0)

10,000,000,000

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:34:57

** since dB = 10 log(I / I0) we have

log(I/I0) = dB / 10. Translating to exponential form this tells us that

I / I0 = 10^(dB/10) wo that

I = I0 * 10^(dB/10).

For a 20 dB sound this gives us

I = I0 * 10^(20/10) = I0 * 10^2 = 100 I0. The sound is 100 times the intensity of the hearing threshold sound.

For a 50 dB sound this gives us

I = I0 * 10^(50/10) = I0 * 10^5 = 100,000 I0. The sound is 100,000 times the intensity of the hearing threshold sound.

For an 80 dB sound this gives us

}I = I0 * 10^(80/10) = I0 * 10^8 = 100,000,000 I0. The sound is 100,000,000 times the intensity of the hearing threshold sound.

For a 100 dB sound this gives us

I = I0 * 10^(100/10) = I0 * 10^10 = 10,000,000,000 I0. The sound is 10,000,000,000 times the intensity of the hearing threshold sound. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:36:07

What equation you would solve to find the intensity for decibel levels of 35, 83 and 117 dB.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

35 = 10 log (I/I0)

83 = 10 log (I/I0)

117 = 10 log (I/I0)

**Was not told that we needed to solve**

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:36:16

** the equation to find I is dB = 10 log(I / I0) so the equations would be

35 = 10 log(I / I0)

83 = 10 log(I / I0)

117 = 10 log(I / I0).

The solution for I in the equation dB = 10 log(I / I0) is

I = I0 * 10^(dB/10). For the given values we would get solutions

10^(35/10) I0 = 3162.3 I0

10^(83/10) I0 = 199526231.5 I0

10^(117/10) I0 = 501187233627 I0 **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:47:24

9. is log(x^y) = x log(y) valid? If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no. If the equation were written log(x^y) = y log (x) then it would be fine. But the equation you gave is not valid

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:48:39

** log(a^b) = b log a so log(x^y) should be y log (x), not x log(y). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:51:26

is log(x/y) = log(x) - log(y) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

yes it is valid. Accoring to the rules....it is possible.

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:52:00

Yes , this is valid. It is the inverse of the exponential law a^x / a^y = a^(x-y).

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:55:01

is log (x * y) = log(x) * log(y) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, It would be log (x*y) = log x + log y

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:55:08

No. log(x * y) = log(x) + log(y)

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:57:28

03-26-2007 20:57:28

is 2 log(x) = log(2x) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

NOTES -------> no, it would be 2 log (x) = log (x^2)

.......................................................!!!!!!!!...................................

20:57:30

is 2 log(x) = log(2x) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:57:37

** log(a^b) = b log a so 2 log(x) = log(x^2), not log(2x). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:04:40

is log(x + y) = log(x) + log(y) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, log (x+y) = log (ab)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:04:49

** log(x) + log(y) = log(xy), not log(x+y). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:05:50

is log(x) + log(y) = log(xy) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

yeswe just proved it in the last question

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:06:08

This is value. It is inverse to the law of exponents a^x*a^y = a^(x+y)

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:07:39

is log(x^y) = (log(x)) ^ y valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, log (x^y) = y log (x)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:07:45

No. log(x^y) = y log (x).

This is the invers of the law (x^a)^b = x^(ab)

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:09:23

is log(x - y) = log(x) - log(y) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, log (x) - log (y) = log (a/b)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:09:41

No. log(x-y) = log x/ log y

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:13:08

is 3 log(x) = log(x^3) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

yes it is valid.

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:13:14

Yes. log(x^a) = a log(x).

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:14:53

is log(x^y) = y + log(x) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, the correct answer would be log (x^y) = y log (x)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:16:00

is log(x/y) = log(x) / log(y) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

no, should be log (x/y) = log x - log y

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:16:14

is log(x^y) = y log(x) valid. If so why, and if not why not?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

yes

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:16:20

This is valid.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:18:59

10. what do you get when you simplify log {base 8} (1024)? If it can be evaluated exactly, what is the result and how did you get it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

This would be

log {base 8} (1024) =

log (1024) / log 8

(3.010) / (.903)

3.333

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:21:33

COMMON ERROR: log {base 8} (1024) = Log (1024) / Log (8) = 3.33333

EXPLANATION:

log {base 8} (1024) = Log (1024) / Log (8) is correct, but 3.33333 is not an exact answer.

log {base 8 } (1024) = log {base 8 } (2^10).

Since 8 = 2^3, 2^10 = 2^(3 * 10/3) = (2^3)^(10/3) = 8^(10/3).

Thus log {base 8} 1024 = log{base 8} 8^(10/3) = 10/3.

Note that 10/3 is not exactly equal to 3.33333. You need to give exact answers where possible.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I don't fully understand where you got the log {base 8} (1024) = log {base 8) (2^10) and I really don't understand where you went after that.

self critique assessment: 1

8 = 2^3 and 1024 = 2^10; both numbers are integer powers of the same base. So the log will be a rational number (expressible as a common fractino) and does not need to be approximated.

Do you understand why 2^10 = 2^(3 * 10/3) = (2^3)^(10/3) = 8^(10/3)?

Given this fact, is it clear why log{base 8}(8^(10/3)) = 10/3?

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:34:31

what do you get when you simplify log {base 2} (4 * 32)? If it can be evaluated exactly, what is the result and how did you get it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

log {base 2} (4 * 32)

log {base 2} (4) + log {base 2} (32)

log {base 2} (2^2) + log {base 2} (2^5)

log {base 2} (2^2) = 2

log {base 2} (2^5) = 5

2 + 5 = 7

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:34:44

** log{base 2}(4*32) = log{bse 2}(2^2 * 2^5) = log{base 2}(2^7) = 7. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:37:08

what do you get when you simplify log (1000)? If it can be evaluated exactly, what is the result and how did you get it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

log (1000) = 3

A log without ""base"" is a base 10 log

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:38:28

what do you get when you simplify ln(3xy)? If it can be evaluated exactly, what is the result and how did you get it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

If you can do ln like log:

ln(3) +ln x + ln y

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:38:50

ln(3xy) = ln (3) + ln(x) + ln(y) = 1.0986 + ln(x) + ln(y)

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I just didn't simplify ln 3

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:41:32

what do you get when you simplify log(3) + log(7) + log(41)? If it can be evaluated exactly, what is the result and how did you get it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

You get:

.477 + .845 + 1.613

2.935

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:44:39

log(3) + log(7) + log(41) = log (3*7*41). 3 * 7 * 41 is not a rational-number power of 10 so this can't be evaluated exactly.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I didn't realize that it had to be a power of 10.

self critique assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:53:34

11. Show how you used the given values to find the logarithm of 12. Explain why the given values don't help much if you want the log of 17.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

For log 12

(log 3 = .477) + 2 * (log 2^2 = .301)

.477 + .301 + .301

1.079

There are no multiples of 17 especially any squares

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:18:18

12. What do you get when you solve 3 ^ (2x) = 7 ^ (x-4), and how did you solve the equation?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

3 ^ (2x) = 7 ^ (x - 4)

log [ 3 ^ (2x) ] = log [ 7 ^ (x - 4) ]

(2x) log(3) = (x-4) log(7)

2x log(3) = x log(7) - 4 log(2)

2x log(3) - x log (7) = -4 log(7)

x ( 2 log(3) - log(7) ) = -4 log(7)

x = [-4 log(7)] / [ 2 log(3) - log(7)]

x = (-3.38) / (.954 - .845)

x = 3.38 / .109

x = 31.009

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:20:02

** log[3^(2x)]= log [7^(x-4)]. Using the laws of logarithms we get

2xlog(3)= (x-4) log(7). The distributive law gives us

2xlog(3)= xlog(7)- 4log(7). Rearranging to get all x terms on one side we get

2xlog(3)- xlog(7)= -4log(7). Factor x out of the left-hand side to get

x ( 2 log(3) - log(7) ) = -4 log(7) so that

x = -4 log(7) / [ 2 log(3) - log(7) ].

Evaluating this we get x = -31, approx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I think I forgot the negative sign.

You did lose track of the - sign at the end.

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:34:32

What do you get when you solve 2^(3x) + 2^(4x) = 9, and how did you solve the equation?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

2^(3x) + 2^(4x) = 9

log [ 2 ^ (3x) ] + log [ 2 ^ (4x) ] = 9

(3x) log(2) + (4x) log(2) = 9

3x log(2) + 4x log(2) = 9

3x log(2) + 4x log (2) = 9

x ( 3 log(2) +4 log(2) ) = 9

x = [9 / [ 3 log(2) + 4 log(2)]

x = 9 / (.903 + 1.204)

x = 9 / 2.107

x = 4.271

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:35:53

COMMON ERROR: 3xlog(2) + 4xlog(2) = 9

Explanation:

Your equation would require that log( 2^(3x) + 2^(4x) ) = log(2^(3x) ) + log(2^(4x)).

This isn't the case. log(a + b) is not equal to log(a) + log(b). log(a) + log(b) = log(a * b), not log(a + b).

If this step was valid you would have a good solution.

However it turns out that this equation cannot be solved exactly for x. The best we can do is certain sophisticated forms of trial and error. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

so all that work for nothing.

self critique assessment: 1

It's something if it brings home the importance of applying the laws carefully. You assume that log(a + b) = log(a) + log(b) in your very first step.

There is no distributive law for the log function, or for most other functions (e.g., sqrt(a + b) is not sqrt(a) + sqrt(b); for anything but a linear function you can't assume that f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)).

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:40:13

What do you get when you solve 3^(2x-1) * 3^(3x+2) = 12, and how did you solve the equation?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

3^(2x-1) * 3^(3x+2) = 12

3 ^ (2x-1+3x+2) = 12

3 ^ (5x + 1) = 12

confidence assessment:

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:41:17

** 3^(2x-1) * 3^(3x+2) = 12. Take log of both sides:

log{3} [3^(2x-1) * 3^(3x+2)] = log{3} 12. Use log(a*b) = log(a) + log(b):

log{3}(3^(2x-1)) + log{3}(3^(3x+2) = log{3} 12. Use laws of logs:

(2x-1) + (3x+2) = log{3} 12. Rearrange the left-hand side:

5x + 1 = log{3}12. Subtract 1 from both sides then divide both sides by 5:

x = (log {3}(12) -1)/ 5. Evaluate using calculator:

x = .2524 **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I accidentally hit the ""enter Response"" button. But I understand how to do this problem.

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

??????????????assignment #018

018. `query 18

Precalculus I

03-30-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

18:44:10

query fitting exponential functions to data

1. what is the exponential function of form A (2^(k1 t) ) such that the graph passes thru points (-4,3) and (7,2), and what equations did you solve to obtain your result?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

The exponential function I got was y = 2.587(2^-.053t)

I got it by using the equations 3 = A (2^-4k1) and 2 = A(2^7k1)

I divided the first by the second and got 1.5 = (2^-4k1)/(2^7k1) which then can be written:

1.5 = 2^(-4k1 - 7k1) or 1.5 = 2 ^ (-11k1)

Then take the log:

log 1.5 = -11k1 log 2

(log 1.5)/(-11 log 2) = k1

k1 = .176/-3.311

k1 = -.053

Then Substitute back into: 2 = A (2 ^ (7*-.053))

2 = A (2 ^ (-.371)

2 = A (.773)

A = 2.587

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

18:47:53

** Substituting data points into the form y = A * 2^(kx) we get

3= A * 2^(-4k) and

2= A * 2^(7k)

Dividing the first equation by the second we get

1.5= 2^(-4k)/ 2^(7k)= 2^(-4-7k)= 2^(-11k)

so that

log(2^(-11k)) = log(1.5) and

-11 k * log(2) = log 1.5 so that

k= log(1.5) / (-11log(2)). Evaluating with a calculator:

k= -.053

From the first equation

A = 3 / (2 ^(-4k) ). Substituting k = -.053 we get

A= 3/ 1.158 = 2.591.

So our form y = A * 2^(kx) gives us

y= 2.591(2^-.053t). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I went back and rechecked my answer I still got that it was 2.587 (2^-.053t)

self critique assessment: 1

If you use more significant figures in your solution for k1 you get 2.589, not 2.587. However you don't get 2.591; and for the two-significant-figure approximation -.053 you do get 2.587.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:20:57

what is the exponential function of form A b^t such that the graph passes thru points thru points (-4,3) and (7,2).

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Somehow this keeps skipping on me. Here is the answer I was trying to type in:

y = 2.591 e ^ (-.053t)

First I used the equations: 3 = A * e^ (-4k2) and 2 = A * e ^ (7k2)

Then divide the first by the second to get:

1.5 = (e ^ (-4k2)) / (e ^ 7k2)

1.5 = e ^ (-4k2 - 7k2)

1.5 = e ^ (-11k2)

Take Natural Log:

-11k2 ln e = ln 1.5

k2 = (ln 1.5) / (-11 ln e)

k2 = .405 / -11

k2 = -.037

Put this back into an original equation:

2 = A * e ^(7 * -.037)

2 = A * e ^(-.259)

2 = A * .772

A = 2.591

I had a small problem with this one....but I am sure after looking at the explaination I will understand. I didn't get the equation, but here is how far I got:

3 = A*b^(-4) and 2 = A*b^(7) Divide 1st by the 2nd

1.5 = (b^(-4)) / (b^7)

1.5 = b ^(-4 - 7)

1.5 = b ^ (-11)

*At this point I wasn't sure whether to make it linear or take the log to get b...

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:27:45

** Our equations are

3= Ab^-4

2= Ab^7

3/2= Ab^-4/Ab^7

1.5= b^-11

b= .96

3= A * .96 ^ -4

3= A * 1.177

2.549= A

y= 2.549 * .96^t **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Ok, maybe not....I see the equation I started with but do not see how to get the .96. I know it is probably something simple that I should know, but I am having a memory lapse.

self critique assessment: 1

To solve 1.5 = b^(-11) for b, take the -1/11 power of both sides:

1.5^(-1/11) = (b^-11)^(-1/11) gives you

b = 1.5^(-1/11) = .96.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:37:35

2. Find the exponential function corresponding to the points (5,3) and (10,2).

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I used the formula y = A * b^t

3 = A * b^5 and 2 = A *b^10

1.5 = (b^5) / (b^10)

1.5 = b ^ (5-10)

1.5 = b ^(-5)

b= .922

3 = A * .922^5

3 = A *.666

A = 4.5 05

y = 4.505 * .922^t

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:37:54

** Using y = A b^t we get equations

3= Ab^5

2= Ab^10

Dividing first by second:

3/2= Ab^5/Ab^10.

1.5= Ab^-5

b= .922

Now A = 3 / b^5 = 3 / .922^5 = 4.5.

Our model is

y = 4.5 * .922^t. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:05:11

What are k1 and k2 such that b = e^k2 = 2^k1?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

3 = A * 2^(k1 * 5) and 2 = A * 2^(k1 * 10)

1.5 = (2^(k1*5) / (2^(k1*10)

1.5 = 2^ (5k1-10k1)

1.5 = 2^(-5k1)

log 1.5 = -5k1 log 2

k1 = (log 1.5) / (-5 log 2)

k1 = .176/-1.505

k1 = -.117

3 = A * 2^(-.117 * 5)

3 = A * 2^ (-.585)

3 = A * (.667)

4.5 = A

y = 4.5 * 2^(.-117t)

3 = A * e^ (k2 *5) 2 = A * e^ (k2 *10)

1.5 = (e^(k2*5) / (e^(k2*10)

1.5 = e^ (5k2-10k2)

1.5 = 2^(-5k2)

ln 1.5 = -5k2 ln e

k2 = (ln 1.5) / (-5 ln e)

k2 = ..405/-5

k2 = -.081

3 = A * 2^(-.081 * 5)

3 = A * 2^ (-.585)

3 = A * (.405)

7.407 = A

y = 7.407 * e^(-.081t)

b = .922

e^-.081 = .922

2^ -.117 = .992

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:05:16

** .922 = e^k2 is directly solved by taking the natural log of both sides to get

k2 = ln(.922) = -.081.

.922= 2^k1 is solved as follows:

log(.922) = log(2) k1

k1 = log(.922) / log(2) = -.117 approx..

Using these values for k1 and k2 we get

}g(x) = A * 2^(k1 t) = 4.5 * 2^(-.117 t) and

h(x) = A e^(k2 t) = 4.5 e^(-.081 t). ****

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:47:48

3. earthquakes measure R1 = 7.4 and R2 = 8.2.

What is the ratio I2 / I1 of intensity and how did you find it?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I wasn't sure how to find the I value from the equation: R = log (I/Io)

I got this far:

7.4 = log (I/Io) and 8.2 = log (I/Io)

The hind says solve for I....I'm not quite sure what I need to do.

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:57:59

** R1 = log(I1 / I0) and R2 = log(I2 / I0) so

I1/I0 = 10^R1 and I1 = 10^R1 * I0 and

I2/I0 = 10^R2 and I2 = 10^R2 * I0 so

I2 / I1 = (I0 * 10^R2) / (I0 * 10^R1) = 10^R2 / 10^R1 = 10^(R2-R1).

So if R2 = 8.2 and R1 = 7.4 we have

I2 / I1 = 10^(R2 - R1) = 10^(8.2 - 7.4) = 10^.8 = 6.3 approx.

An earthquake with R = 8.2 is about 6.3 times as intense as an earthquake with R = 7.4. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

After looking at the explaination, I totally understand how to do this! Great!!!!

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:09:37

** As before I2 / I1 = 10^(R2-R1). If R2 is 1.6 greater than R1 we have R2 - R1 = 1.6 and

I2 / I1 = 10^1.6 = 40 approx.

An earthquake with R value 1.6 higher than another is 40 times as intense. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Again it beat me to typing:

Using the Info and what we know we can find:

R2 = R1 + 1.6

and Using the formula, 10^ (R2-R1)

10^(R1+1.6-R1) = 10 ^ 1.6

Therefore it would be 39.81 times more intense.

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:10:00

If one earthquake as an R value `dR higher than another, what is the ratio I2 / I1?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

as with the other problem:

10^dR

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:10:06

** As before I2 / I1 = 10^(R2-R1). If R2 is `dR greater than R1 we have R2 - R1 = `dR and

I2 / I1 = 10^`dR. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

Very good work. See my notes and let me know if you have questions.