#$&*
course Phy 231
12/06/2011 @ 9:05p.m.
Oscillating Candy Bar
You suspended a candy bar from a rubber band chain and counted its oscillations for a minute. You did the same for a stack of 2 dominoes, and for a stack of four dominoes.
Insert a copy of your data here, along with any previously submitted work you wish to include:
****
The lab was very simple; I constructed a rubber band chain six bands long with a total length of 39cm. I then hung a Snicker’s bar from the chain and began gently oscillating the chain to maintain a constant rate of oscillation. I did this for 1 minute, and counted the number of oscillations. I then hung 4 dominos from the chain, then 8 dominos from the chain and measured the change in length.
Snickers: 80 oscillations/minute
4 Domino Length: 50 cm
8 Domino Length: 69 cm
Each Domino weights about 15.75g and adds about .86cm to the chain length
This means the chain stretches about .055cm per gram added.
#$&*
For each number of dominoes, determine the force constant k, based on your observations of the number of oscillations in a minute (which you can use to find the angular frequency omega) and the mass of the domino stack.
****
For 4 dominos, I calculated k = 5,600 dynes/cm. For 8 dominos, I calculated k = 4,100 dynes/cm
#$&*
@&
You don't say how you calculated this, but from two length vs. force points you can get only one value of k.
*@
Are your values of the force constant reasonably consistent?
****
The values of K are within about 25% of one another. I believe this is due to variations in the masses of the dominos having a larger influence using less dominos.
#$&*
Based on your best estimate of the force constant and your observation of the frequency of the oscillations of the candy bar, what is the mass of the candy bar?
****
If omega = 8.12 rad/sec (oscillations per sec converted to rad per sec), and K = 4100dynes/cm…then solving for m in the following equation gives us our mass.
8.12 rad/sec = sqrt.(4100dynes/cm / m)
M = 62g
According to nutrition facts, a bar has a mass of 57g, so I was off by about 9%...which doesn’t seem too bad given the measuring tools.
@&
Yes, this one works out pretty accurately.
However your differing values of k should be reconciled.
Please see my notes and, unless my notes indicate that revision is optional, submit a copy of this document with revisions and/or questions, and mark your insertions with &&&& (please mark each insertion at the beginning and at the end).
Be sure to include the entire document, including my notes.
If my notes indicate that revision is optional, use your own judgement as to whether a revision will benefit you.
*@