assn8query

course

Would like to have feedback. Thanks, Joshua. Would like to have clarification on the second part of question 2.

assignment #008008. `query 8

Physics I

07-14-2008

......!!!!!!!!...................................

12:26:52

QUESTION FROM STUDENT--Please define the differnece between Fnet and Force.

See if you can answer this question.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Force is what compels an object to have motion and Fnet is the sum of all the forces acting on the object.

confidence assessment: 3

An object will keep moving forever with no applied force. It takes force to change the velocity of an object, not to make it move. It might already be moving--if you choose a random object in the universe it probably will, relative to whatever other object you happen to use as your point of reference.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

12:27:00

07-14-2008 12:27:00

** Net force is the sum of all forces acting on an object. If you're pushing your car you are exerting a force, friction is opposing you, and the let force is the sum of the two (noting that one is positive, the other negative so you end up with net force less than the force you are exerting). Your heart rate responds to the force you are exerting and the speed with which the car is moving; the accel of the car depends on the net force. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

NOTES ------->

.......................................................!!!!!!!!...................................

12:38:37

In terms of the equations of motion why do we expect that a * `ds is proportional to the change in v^2, and why do we then expect that the change in v^2 is proportional to Fnet `ds?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

'ds is a mulitple equalling 1/2 of the change in v^2

'v^2 is a multiple of fnet*'ds

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

12:40:57

07-14-2008 12:40:57

** It's very important in physics to be able to think in terms of proportionality. To say that y is proportional to x is to say that for some k, y = k x. That is, y is a constant multiple of x.

To say that a * `ds is proportional to the change in v^2 is to say that for some k, a * `ds = k * ( change in v^2)--i.e., that a * `ds is a constant multiple of the change in v^2.

In terms of the equations of motion, we know that

vf^2 = v0^2 + 2 a `ds so

a `ds = 1/2 (vf^2 - v0^2), which is 1/2 the change in v^2.

So a `ds is a constant multiple (1/2) of the change in v^2.

Formally we have a `ds = k ( change in v^2) for k = 1/2.

Now since Fnet = m a we see that Fnet is proportional to a for a given mass m, and it follows that

Fnet `ds = k * change in v^2, for the appropriate k (specifically for k = mass / 2. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

NOTES ------->

.......................................................!!!!!!!!...................................

12:41:59

How do our experimental results confirm or refute this hypothesis?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

A graph of 'dv vs 's should be linear. Therefore confirming the hypothesis

confidence assessment: 2

A graph of 'dv vs 's will not be linear if v^2 is proportional to `ds; would be if v was proportional to `ds but this is not the case.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

12:42:12

07-14-2008 12:42:12

** We didn't actually do this part of the experiment, but on a ramp with fixed slope a `ds is simply proportional to `ds. When we measured `dt for different distances from rest down the same ramp, we were then able to determine the average and final velocities. The change in v^2 for each timing would be from 0 to vf^2. The change would therefore be just vf^2.

If a `ds is proportional to the change in vf^2 then a graph of vf^2 vs. a `ds should be linear. Since a is constant we don't even need to determine it--a graph of vf^2 vs. `ds would be linear. This would confirm the hypothesis. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

NOTES ------->

................................................."

&#

Your work looks good. See my notes. Let me know if you have any questions. &#