Assignment 7

#$&*

course Mth 163

2/7/13 around 9:30p.m.

007.

*********************************************

Question: `q001. Note that this assignment has 8 questions

Sketch a graph of the following (x, y) points: (1,2), (3, 5), (6, 6). Then sketch the straight line which appears to come as close as possible, on the average, to the three points. Your straight line should not actually pass through any of the given points.

• Describe how your straight line lies in relation to the points.

• Give the coordinates of the point at which your straight line passes through the y axes, and give the coordinates of the x = 2 and x = 7 points on your straight line.

• Determine the slope of the straight line between the last two points you gave.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

My graph goes above the third and first points and goes below the second point.

The straight lines passes through the y axis at about 3 and 7 and we get the coordinates (2,3) & (7,7).

Therefore the slope of this lines would be (7-3)/ (7-2). That would equal 4/5 which gives us 0.8.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Your straight line should pass above the first and third points and beneath the second. If this is not the case the line can be modified so that it comes closer on the average to all three points.

The best possible straight line passes through the y-axis near y = 2. The x = 2 point on the best possible line has a y coordinate of about 3, and the x = 7 point has a y coordinate of about 7. So the best possible straight line contains points with approximate coordinate (2,3) and (7,7).

The slope between these two points is rise/run = (7 - 3)/(7 - 2) = 4/5 = .8.

Note that the actual slope and y intercept of the true best-fit line, to 3 significant figures, are .763 and 1.79. So the equation of the line is .763 x + 1.79

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q002. Plug coordinates of the x = 2 and x = 7 points into the form y = m x + b to obtain two simultaneous linear equations. Give your two equations. Then solve the equations for m and b and substitute these values into the form y = m x + b. What equation do you get?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Substituing values in would give us, Y = mx+ b would equal 7 = m*7 + b and 3 = m*2 +b.

In order to solve for m we can subtract the second equation from the first and get 4 = 5m and divide 4 by 5 and get m = 0.8

We then plug 0.8 into one of the equations, I chose the first and get b. When we do this we get the equation 7 = 0.8 * 7 + b. We multiply and get 7 = 5.6 + b. Subtract 5.6 from 7 and get b = 1.4.

Our final equation is then y = .8 x + 1.4

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Plugging the coordinates (2,3) and (7, 7) into the form y = m x + b we obtain the equations

3 = 2 * m + b

7 = 7 * m + b.

Subtracting the first equation from the second will eliminate b. We get 4 = 5 * m. Dividing by 5 we get m = 4/5 = .8.

Plugging m = .8 into the first equation we get 3 = 2 * .8 + b, so 3 = 1.6 + b and b = 3 - 1.6 = 1.4.

Now the equation y = m x + b becomes y = .8 x + 1.4.

Note that the actual best-fit line is y = .763 x + 1.79, accurate to three significant figures.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q003. Using the equation y = .8 x + 1.4, find the coordinates of the x = 1, 3, and 6 points on the graph of the equation.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

To solve we plug in each x for the x in the equation. We get y = 0.8 * 1 + 1.4 for the first equation. We multiply and then add and get y = 2.2 giving us the coordinate (1,2.2).

We do the same thing with the next equation and get (3, 3.8) and again for the last x getting (6, 6.2).

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Evaluating y =.8 x + 1.4 at x = 1, 3, and 6 we obtain y values 2.2, 3.8, and 6.2.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q004. The equation y = .8 x + 1.4 gives you points (1, 2.2), (3, 3.8), and (6,6.2). How close, on the average, do these points come to the original data points (1,2), (3, 5), and (6, 6)?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The average difference would be 2.2 - 2 which is 0.2

5 - 3.8 which is 1.2 and 6.2 - 6 which is again 0.2

We can add all of these together getting (0.2 + 0.2 + 1.2) / 3 giving us 0.53.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

(1, 2.2) differs from (1, 2) by the .2 unit difference between y = 2 and y = 2.2.

(3, 3.8) differs from (3, 5) by the 1.2 unit difference between y = 5 and y = 3.8.

(6, 6.2) differs from (6, 6) by the .2 unit difference between y = 6 and y = 6.2.

{}The average discrepancy is the average of the three discrepancies:

ave discrepancy = ( .2 + 1.2 + .2 ) / 3 = .53.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q005. Using the best-fit equation y =.76 x + 1.79, with the numbers accurate to the nearest .01, how close do the predicted points corresponding to x = 1, 3, and 6 come to the original data points (1,2), (3, 5), and (6, 6)?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

When we plug in these values for x and solve for y we get 2.55, 4.07, & 6.25.

This is .55, .93, .25 points off each x value. If we add all of these and divide by 3 we get the average discrepancy of 0.61

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Evaluating y =.76 x + 1.79 at x = 1, 3 and 6 we obtain y values 2.55, 4.07 and 6.35. This gives us the points (1,2.55), (3,4.07) and (6, 6.35). These points lie at distances of .55, .93, and .35 from the original data points.

The average distance is (.55 + .93 + .35) / 3 = .61 from the points.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q006. The average distance of the best-fit line to the data points appears to greater than the average distance of the line we obtain by an estimate. In fact, the best-fit line doesn't really minimize the average distance but rather the square of the average distance. The distances for the best-fit model are .55, .93 and .35, while the average distances for our first model are .2, 1.2 and .2. Verify that the average of the square distances is indeed less for the best-fit model.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The squared distances for the line I constructed gives us (.2)^2 = 0.04, (1.2)^2 = 1.44, & (0.2)^2 = 0.04. When we add all of these and divide we get 0.04 +1.44+0.04 / 3 = 0.51

The squared distances for the best-fit model give us (0.55)^2 = 0.30, (0.93)^2 = 0.86, & (0.35)^2 = 0.122. when we add all of these and divide we get 0.30 + 0.86 + 0.122 / 3 = 0.43

Therefore the best-fit model has few discrepancies and is the better model.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

The square distances for the best-fit model are .55^2 = .30, .93^2 = .87 and .35^2 = .12. The average of these square distances is (.30 + .87 + .12) / 3 = .43.

The squared distances for the first model are .2^2 = .04, 1.2^2 = 1.44 and .2^2 = .04, so the average of the square distances for this model is (.04 + 1.44 + .04) / 3 = .51.

Thus the best-fit model does give the better result.

We won't go into the reasons here why it is desirable to minimize the square of the distance rather than the distance. When doing eyeball estimates, you don't really need to take this subtlety into account. You can simply try to get is close is possible, on the average, to the points.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q007. If the original data points (1,2), (3, 5), and (6, 6) represent the selling price in dollars of a bag of widgets vs. the number of widgets in the bag, then how much is paid for a bag of 3 widgets? How much would you estimate a bag of 7 widgets would cost?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

We should use the best-fit model since it is more accurate and plug in 3 into the x and get y = .76 * 3 + 1.79 = 4.07, representing cost of $4.07.

For a bag of 3 widgets it would be about $4.07

I would estimate that a bag of 7 widgets would y = .76 * 7 + 1.79 = 7.11.

The cost of 7 widgets would be $7.11.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

If we use the best-fit function y =.76 x + 1.79, noting that y represents the cost and x the number of widgets, then the cost of 3 widgets is

y = .76 * 3 + 1.79 = 4.07, representing cost of $4.07.

The cost of 7 widgets would be

y = .76 * 7 + 1.79 = 7.11. The cost of 7 widgets would be $7.11.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q008. According to the function y = .8 x + 1.4, how much will a bag of 7 widgets cost? How many widgets would you expect to get for $10?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

The cost of 7 widgets would be

y = .8 * 7 + 1.4 = $7.11.

For $10 we would use the equation

10 = .8 x + 1.4 = 10.75 widgets

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

Using the model we obtained, y = .8 x + 1.4, we note that the cost is represented by y and the number of widgets by acts. Thus we can find cost of 7 widgets by letting x = 7:

cost = y = .8 * 7 + 1.4 = 7.

To find the number of widgets you can get for $10, let y = 10. Then the equation becomes

10 = .8 x + 1.4.

We easily solve this equation by subtracting 1.4 from both sides than dividing by .8 to obtain x = 10.75. That is, we can buy 10.75 widgets with $10.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary): ok

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating: 3

*********************************************

Question: `q009. Sketch a graph with the points (5, 7), (8, 8.5) (10, 9) and (12, 12). Sketch the straight line you think best fits the data points.

Extend your line until it intercepts both the x and y axes.

What is your best estimate of the slope of your line? 5/7 or 0.714

What is your best estimate of the x intercept of your line? X = 1

What is your best estimate of the y intercept of your line? Y = 4

@&

Your estimates aren't consistent.

Your slope .714 is plausible.

However a line with x intercept 1 and y intercept 4 has slope -4, not .714. This combination of intercepts are not plausible.

The y intercept of 4 is reasonable. It's the x intercept of 1 that isn't. Your graph couldn't have gone through the x axis at x = 1.

*@

If your graph represents the cost in dollars of a widget vs. the number of widgets sold, then what is the cost of 4 widgits, and how many widgets could you get for $20?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Best estimate for slope = 5/7 or 0.714

Best estimate for x intercept is 1

Best estimate for y intercept is 4

For 4 widgits it would cost $6.29 and for $20 you could get about 23.

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*********************************************

Question: `q010. Plot the three points (1, 2), (2, 3.5) and (3, 4) on a reasonably accurate hand-sketched graph. Sketch a straight line through the first and last points.

What is the distance of each of the three points from the line?

What is the sum of these distances?

What is the sum of the squares of these distances?

Sketch a line 1/4 of a unit higher than the line you drew.

What is the distance of each of the three points from the new line?

What is the sum of these distances?

What is the sum of the squares of these distances?

Which line is closer to the points, on the average?

For which line is the sum of the squares of the distances less?

How far from the line y = x + 7/6 is each of the three points?

What is the sum of these distances?

What is the sum of the squares of these distances?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

First we need to find the best-fit equation and to do this we will first find the slope. We plug in 2 coordinates into the slope formula and get (4-2)/(3-1). Therefore our slope is 1. We plug this into the y = mx + b formula for m and get y = 1x + b. Then we plug a coordinate into the y = mx + b and get 2 = 1*1 + b. Solving this we get b = 1.

So we are left with the equation y = 1x + 1.

@&

Very good.

However you haven't answered all the questions.

For example, if your equation is y = x + 1, then what is the y value corresponding to x = 2?

How far is the corresponding point on the graph from (2, 3.5)?

*@

confidence rating #$&*:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:1

@&

Good work. You might have questions on some of my notes, and if so they are welcome.

*@