Assignment Two

course Mth 272

I understood this stuff a lot better than the first assignment.

??M???x??~???€??assignment #002002. `query 2

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

Applied Calculus II

06-19-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:24:52

4.4.4 (was 4.3 #40 write ln(.056) = -2.8824 as an exponential equation

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

e^-2.8824=.056

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:25:21

y = ln x is the same as e^y = x, so in exponential form the equation should read

e^-2.8824 = .056 **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok I got that right

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:26:00

4.4.8 (was 4.3 #8) write e^(.25) = 1.2840 as a logarithmic equation

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ln(1.2840)=.25

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:26:20

e^x = y is the same as x = ln(y) so the equation is

.25 = ln(1.2840). **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok I got that one right also

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:52:59

4.4.16 (was 4.3 #16) Sketch the graph of y = 5 + ln x.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

The graph is a logarithmic curve that passes through the point (1,5) with a vertical asymptote at x=0. The graph curves a vertically away from x=0.

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:57:25

Plugging in values is a good start but we want to explain the graph and construct it without having to resort to much of that.

The logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function, which is concave up, has asymptote at the negative x axis and passes thru (0, 1). Reversing the coordinates of the exponential graph gives you a graph which is concave down, asymptotic to the negative y axis and passes thru (1, 0). Adding 5 to get y = 5 + ln x raises this graph 5 units so that the graph passes thru (1, 5) and remains asymptotic to the negative y axis and also remains concave down.

The graph is asymptotic to the negative y axis, and passes through (1,5). The function is increasing at a decreasing rate; another way of saying this is that it is increasing and concave down.

STUDENT COMMENT: I had the calculator construct the graph. I can do it by hand but the calculator is much faster. INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: The calculator is faster but you need to understand how different graphs are related, how each is constructed from one of a few basic functions, and how analysis reveals the shapes of graphs. The calculator doesn't teach you that, though it can be a nice reinforcing tool and it does give you details more precise than those you can imagine.

Ideally you should be able to visualize these graphs without the use of the calculator.

For example the logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function, which is concave up, has asymptote at the negative x axis and passes thru (0, 1). Reversing the coordinates of the exponential graph gives you a graph which is concave down, asymptotic to the negative y axis and passes thru (1, 0). Adding 5 to get y = 5 + ln x raises this graph 5 units so that the graph passes thru (1, 5) and remains asymptotic to the negative y axis and also remains concave down. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

yeah I got it down pretty good... the logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function. The logarithmic function that it asked for is concave down and incresing passing through the point (1,5).

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:13:44

4.4.22 (was 4.3 #22) Show e^(x/3) and ln(x^3) inverse functions

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

f(x) = e^(x/3)

g(x) = lnx^3

First, f(g(x)) = e^((lnx^3)/3) = e^(3lnx/3) = e^lnx = x

then, g(f(x)) = ln(e^(x/3))^3 = lne^x = x

for f(g(x)) I used the properties of logs then the 3's cancled out leaving me e^lnx which equals x.

Not sure this next part is right

for g(f(x)) I multiplied the two exponents together and then the 3's cancled out leaving lne^x which then just equals x.

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:15:38

GOOD STUDENT RESPONSE:

Natural logarithmic functions and natural exponential functions are inverses of each other.

f(x) = e^(x/3)

y = e^(x/3)

x = e^(y/3)

y = lnx^3

f(x) = lnx^3

y = ln x^3

x = lny^3

y = e^(x/3)

INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: Good.

f(x) = e^(x/3) so

f(ln(x^3)) = e^( ln(x^3) / 3) = e^(3 ln(x) / 3) = e^(ln x) = x

would also answer the question

MORE ELABORATION

You have to show that applying one function to the other gives the identity function.

If f(x) = e^(x/3) and g(x) = ln(x^3) then

f(g(x)) = e^(ln(x^3) / 3)

= e^( 3 ln(x) / 3)

= e^(ln(x)) = x. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok they are inverses of each other

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

13:18:48

4.4.46 (was query 4.3 #44) simplify 1/3 [ 2 ln(x+3) + ln x - ln(x^2-1) ]

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ln[ ( (x+3)^2 (x) ) / (x^2-1)]^(1/3)

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

13:21:04

1/3 [ 2 ln(x+3) + ln x - ln(x^2-1) ]

= 2/3 ln(x+3) + 1/3 ln x - 1/3 ln(x^2-1)

= ln(x+3)^(2/3) + ln(x^(1/3)) - ln((x^2-1)^(1/3))

= ln [ (x+3)^(2/3) (x^(1/3) / (x^2-1)^(1/3) ]

= ln [ {(x+3)^2 * x / (x^2-1)}^(1/3) ] **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I think I got that right... but shouldn't thhe ^ (1/3) be on the out side of the whole thing and not just the exponent of the last but rather the exponent of the whole thing.

self critique assessment: 1

Not so, but good question in any case and easy to clarify:

a ln(x) = ln(x^a), not (ln(x))^a.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:02:58

4.4.58 (was 4.3 #58) solve 400 e^(-.0174 t) = 1000.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

t= -52.66

e^-0.0174t = 5/2

-0.0174t= ln5 - ln2

"" = .916

t= -52.66

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:03:07

The equation can easily be arranged to the form

e^(-.0174) = 2.5

We can convert the equation to logarithmic form:

ln(2.5) = -.0174t. Thus

t = ln(2.5) / -.0174 = 52.7 approx.. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

self critique assessment:

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

22:03:12

The equation can easily be arranged to the form

e^(-.0174) = 2.5

We can convert the equation to logarithmic form:

ln(2.5) = -.0174t. Thus

t = ln(2.5) / -.0174 = 52.7 approx.. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

23:06:49

4.4.72 (was 4.3 #68) p = 250 - .8 e^(.005x), price and demand; find demand for price $200 and $125

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

= (-1/249.2)

ln 200 = 249.2 ln 0.005x

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

02:12:41

p = 250 - .8 e^(.005x) so

p - 250 = - .8 e^(.005x) so

e^(.005 x) = (p - 250) / (-.8) so

e^(.005 x) = 312.5 - 1.25 p so

.005 x = ln(312.5 - 1.25 p) and

x = 200 ln(312.5 - 1.25 p)

If p = 200 then x = 200 ln(312.5 - 1.25 * 200) = 200 ln(62.5) = 827.033.

For p=125 the expression is easily evaluated to give x = 1010.29. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 2

&#

You need a detailed self-critique here.

&#

.................................................

"

This does look good; however when your solution doesn't match the given solution be sure to self-critique as noted.

See my note in response to your question.