course Mth 151 ڌN焄{assignment #021
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:08:45 `q001. If we define the operation @ on two numbers x and y by x @ y = remainder when the product x * y is multiplied by 2 then divided by 3, then find the following: 2 @ 5, 3 @ 8, 7 @ 13.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> 2 @ 5 = 2 3 @ 8 = 0 7 @13 = 2 confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:08:50 By the definition, 2 @ 5 is the remainder when the product 2 * 5 is doubled then divided by 3. We start with 2 * 5 = 10, then double that to get 20, then divide by three. 20 / 3 = 6 with remainder 2. So 2 @ 5 = 2. We follow the same procedure to find 3 @ 8. We get 3 * 8 = 24, then double that to get 48, then divide by three. 48 / 3 = 12 with remainder 0. So 3 @ 8 = 0. Following the same procedure to find 7 @ `2, we get 7 * 13 = 91, then double that to get 182, then divide by three. 182 / 3 = 60 with remainder 2. So 7 @ 13 = 2.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:11:25 `q002. If we define the @ operation from the previous exercise just on the set {5, 6, 7} , we can use the same process as in the preceding solution to get 5 @ 5 = 2, 5 @ 6 = 0, 5 @ 7 = 1, 6 @ 5 = 0, 6 @ 6 = 0, 6 @ 7 = 0, 7 @ 5 = 1, 7 @ 6 = 0 and 7 @ 7 = 2. We can put these results in a table as follows: @ 5 6 7 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 0 7 1 0 2. Make a table for the @ operation restricting x and y to the set {2, 3, 4}.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> 2 @ 3 = 0 2 @ 2 = 2 2 @ 4 = 1 3 @ 2 = 0 3 @ 3 = 0 3 @ 4 = 0 4 @ 2 = 1 4 @ 3 = 0 4 @ 4 = 2 2 3 4 2 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 4 confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:11:33 Using the same process as in the solution to the preceding problem we find that 2 @ 2 = 2, 2 @ 3 = 0, 2 @ 4 = 1, 3 @ 2 = 3 @ 3 = 3 @ 4 = 0, 4 @ 2 = 1, 4 @ 3 = 0 and 4 @ 4 = 2. The table is therefore @ 2 3 4 2 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 2.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:12:22 `q003. All the x and y values for the table in the preceding problem came from the set {2, 3, 4}. From what set are the results x @ y taken?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> All of the results of x @ y in the preceeding problem were from the set 0,1,2 confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:12:28 The results of the operation x @ y, which ultimately consist of the remainder when some number is divided by 3, must all be division-by-3 remainders. The only possible remainders we can have when dividing by three are 0, 1 or 2. Thus all the results of the operation x @ y are members of the set {0, 1, 2}.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:13:03 `q004. Are the results of the operation x @ y on the set {2, 3, 4} all members of the set {2, 3, 4}?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> No, some of the results were 0 or 1 and those are not members of {2, 3, 4} confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:13:10 The possible results of the operation, whose table is @ 2 3 4 2 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 , are seen from the table to be 0, 1 and 2. Of these possible results, only 2 is a member of the set {2,3,4}. So it is not the case that all the results come from the set {2, 3, 4}.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:16:44 `q005. Since the operation x @ y on the set {2, 3, 4} can result in at least some numbers which are not members of the set, we say that the @operation is not closed on the set {2, 3, 4}. Is the @ operation closed on the set S = {0, 1, 2}? Is the @ operation closed on the set T = {0, 2}? Is the @ operation closed on the set R = {1, 2}?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> { 0, 1, 2} 0@0 = 0 0 @ 1= 0 0 @ 2 = 0 1 @ 0 = 0 1@1 = 2 1 @ 2 = 1 2@0= 0 2@1= 1 2@2= 2 Set S is closed. {0,2} 0@0= 0 0@2= 0 2@0= 0 2@2= 2 Set T is closed. {1, 2} 1@1=2 1@2= 1 2@1= 1 2@2= 2 Set R is closed. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:16:52 When operating on the set S = {0, 1, 2} the operation must as always give one of the division-by-3 remainders 0, 1 or 2. Thus the results are all in the set S. When operating on the set T = {0, 2} the possible results are 0 @ 0 = 0 @ 2 = 2 @ 0 = 0, or 2 @ 2 = 2. Since the possible results are 0 and 2, both of which are in T, all the results come from the set T on which we are operating, and the operation is closed on the set T. When operating on the set R = {1, 2} the possible results are 1 @ 1 = 2, 1 @ 2 = 2 @ 1 = 1, or 2 @ 2 = 2. Since the possible results are 1 and 2 and both are in the set R, we can say that all the results come from the set R on which we are operating, and the operation is indeed closed on the set R.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:17:39 `q006. How can we tell by looking at the table whether the operation is closed?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> If all of the numbers in the table are contained in the column on the left or the row on the top, then the operation is closed. If there is a number in the table that is not contained in the left row or the top column then the operation is not closed. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:17:44 If all the numbers in the table come from the far left-hand column of the table--e.g., the column underneath the @ in the tables given above, which lists all the members of the set being operated on --then all the results of the operation are in that set and the operation is therefore closed.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:18:10 `q007. When calculating x @ y for two numbers x and y, does it make a difference whether we calculate x @ y or y @ x?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> No, it does not make a difference - the same result is produced regardless of the order. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:18:15 Since the first step in calculating x @ y is to multiply x * y, it would make no difference whether we multiplied x * y or y * x. So in the first step it makes no difference whether we calculate x @ y or y @ x. Since all we do after that is double our result and calculate the remainder when dividing by 3, the order of x and y won't make a difference there either. So we conclude that for this operation x @ y must always equal y @ x. This property of the operation is called the commutative property, meaning roughly that order doesn't matter.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:19:20 `q008. Does the operation of subtraction of whole numbers have the commutative property?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> No. For example: 20 - 10= 10, but 10 - 20 = -10 confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:19:26 Subtraction of whole numbers does not have the commutative property, because it is not true for most whole numbers x and y that x - y = y - x. For example, 5 - 3 = 2 while 3 - 5 = -2. So for subtraction order usually does matter, and the operation is not commutative.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:20:35 `q009. Is the operation of subtraction closed on the set of whole numbers?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> No. If you subtract a smaller number from a larger number then you will get a whole number. But if you subtract a larger number from a smaller number then you will get a negative number. For example: 9 - 3 = 6 but 3 - 9 = -6 confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:20:40 Whole numbers are the numbers in the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ... }. If we subtract a smaller number from a larger, we will again get a whole number. However if we subtract a smaller number from the larger, we will get a negative result, which is not a whole number. Since it is possible to subtract two numbers in the set and to get a result that is not in the set, the operation is not closed.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:21:40 `q010. Is the operation of addition closed and commutative on the set of whole numbers?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Yes, order is not important in addition, and if two whole numbers are added together they will be positive and the set is closed. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:21:45 When we add two numbers x and y it doesn't matter which one we add to which--it doesn't matter whether we do x + y or y + x--so order doesn't matter and we can say that the operation is commutative. And if we add two whole numbers, which must both be at least 0, we get a whole number which is at least 0. So the operation is also closed.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:21:59 `q011. When we multiply a number by 1, what must be our result?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The number does not change. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:22:04 Any number multiplied by 1 will give us the same number. Any number is unchanged if we multiply it by 1. That is 10 * 1 = 10, or -37.27 * 1 = -37.27, or 72 * 1 = 72. Multiplication by 1 does not change any number.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:25:34 `q012. A number which does not change any number with which it is combined using a certain operation is called the identity for the operation. As we saw in the preceding exercise, the number 1 is the identity for the operation of multiplication on real numbers. Does the operation @ (which was defined in preceding exercises by x @ y = remainder when x * y is doubled and divided by 3) have an identity on the set {0, 1, 2}? Does @ have an identity on the set {0, 2}?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> {0,1,2} The identity in this set is 2, because any number @ 2 remains the same. 0 @ 2 = 0 1 @ 2= 1 2 @ 2= 2 {0,2} 0@0=0 0@2=0 2@0=0 2@2=2 This set does not have an identity. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:25:45 The table for @ on {0, 1, 2) is @ 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 2. We see from the row across from 2 that 2 * 0 = 0, 2 * 1 = 1 and 2 * 2 = 2. We also see from the column beneath 2 that 0 * 2 = 0, 1 * 2 = 1 and 2 * 2 = 2. Thus, no matter how we combine 2 with other numbers in the set {0, 1, 2}, we don't change those other numbers. That is, for any x in the set, 2 @ x = x @ 2 = x. Therefore @ does indeed have identity 2 on the set {0, 1, 2}. On the set {0, 1} the number 2 isn't included. Since 0 * 1 = 0, not 1, the number 0 can't be the identity. Since 1 * 1 = 2, not 1, the number 1 can't be the identity. Both 0 and 1 at least sometimes change the number they operate with, and the identity can't do this.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:26:21 `q013. Does the set of whole numbers on the operation of addition have an identity?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The only number that can be added to a whole number and not change that number is 0. So 0 is the identity for the set of whole numbers. confidence assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:26:27 The identity must be a number that doesn't change the number with which it is combined. The number 0 has this property. Whenever we add to 0 is what we get. 0 doesn't change the number it is combined with under the operation of addition. For any x, 0 + x = x and x + 0 = x. Therefore we can say that 0 is the identity for addition on the set of whole numbers.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> OK self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
"