Assignment1 R1

course Mth 158

Is that how you wish me to Title my work? For example: Assignment 1: Section R.1 to be titled Assignment1 R1.

?????????s?V?|i?

The title is for your benefit, since that will be the name of the link on your access page. The title you used here is fine.

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

assignment #001

001. `query 1

College Algebra

01-16-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:53:11

R.1.14 (was R.1.6) Of the numbers in the set {-sqrt(2), pi + sqrt(2), 1 / 2 + 10.3} which are counting numbers, which are rational numbers, which are irrational numbers and which are real numbers?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Counting numbers are none.

Rational numbers are {1/2 +10.3}

Irrational numbers are {-sqrt(2), pi + sqrt(2)}

Real numbers are all {-sqrt(2), pi + sqrt(2), 1/2 + 10.3}

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:53:59

R.1.32 (was R.1.24) Write in symbols: The product of 2 and x is the product of 4 and 6

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:55:35

** The product of 2 and x is 2 * x and the product of 4 and 6 iw 4 * 6. To say that these are identical is to say that 2*x=4*6. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

True

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

19:59:43

R.1.50 (was R.1.42) Explain how you evaluate the expression 2 - 5 * 4 - [ 6 * ( 3 - 4) ]

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

PEMDAS

2-5*4-[6*(3-4)]=

2-5*4-[6*(-1)]=

2-5*4-[-6]=

2-20-[-6]=

-12

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:00:40

**Starting with

2-5*4-[6*(3-4)]. First you evaluate the innermost group to get

2-5*4-[6*-1] . Then multiply inside brackets to get

2-5*4+6. Then do the multiplication to get

2-20+6. Then add and subtract in order, obtaining

-12. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

So was I to define the explaination likewise the program?

self critique assessment: 3

You showed the details of your steps. Your solution was fine.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:08:34

** COMMON ERROR: Using FOIL. FOIL is not the Distributive Law. FOIL works for binomial expressions. FOIL follows from the distributive law but is of extremely limited usefulness and the instructor does not recommend relying on FOIL.

Starting with

(x-2)(x-4) ; one application of the Distributive Property gives you

x(x-4) - 2(x-4) . Applying the property to both of the other terms we get

x^2 - 4x - (2x -8). Simplifying:

x^2 - 4x - 2x + 8 or

x^2 - 6x + 8. *

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

(x-2)(x-4)

First you distribute the x in (x-2) to the x and 4 in (x-4) by multiplying x(x-4) giving you x^2-4x. Then you distribute the 2 in (x-2) to the x and 4 in (x-4) by multiplying 2(x-4) giving you 2x-8. In which you combine like terms, giving you x^2-4x-2x+8, simplifying: x^2-6x+8

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:15:52

R.1.86 (was R.1.78) Explain why (4+3) / (2+5) is not equal to 4/2 + 3/5.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

(4+3) / (2+5)

First you do what is in parentheses first which gives you 7/10, which is not equal to;

4/2 + 3\5, because you have to find the lowest common denominator of the two fractions before you can proceed to add the two fractions. In which gives you

(4/2)(5/5)=20/10

(3/5)(2/2)=6/10

20/10 + 6/10

20+6/10

26/10 simplifies:

13/5

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:16:33

** Good answer but at an even more fundamental level it comes down to order of operations.

(4+3)/(2+5) means

7/7 which is equal to

1.

By order of operations, in which multiplications and divisions precede additions and subtractions, 4/2+3/5 means

(4/2) + (3/5), which gives us

2+3/5 = 2 3/5 **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:17:11

Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I'm glad that I am understanding this program!

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

You did very well on this assignment. Let me know if you have questions.

"