#$&* course Mth 163 10/21 940This has been a hard assignment 011. `query 11
.............................................
Given Solution: ** the proportionality is y = k x^3. Any proportionality of volumes is a y = k x^3 proportionality because volumes can be filled with tiny cubes; surface areas are y = k x^2 because surfaces can be covered with tiny squares. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Surface areas are y = kx^2 because surfaces can be covered with tiny squares, and y = kx^3 for volume because volumes can be filled with tiny cubes. (notes taken) ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qIf x is the radius of a spherical balloon and y the surface area, what proportionality governs the relationship between y and x? Why should this be the proportionality? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: The surface area would be y = kx^2. This would be the proportionality because surfaces can be covered with tiny squares. confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** Just as little cubes can be thought of as filling the volume to any desired level of accuracy, little squares can be thought of as covering any smooth surface. Cubes 'scale up' in three dimensions, squares in only two. So the proportionality is y = k x^2. Surfaces can be covered as nearly as we like with tiny squares (the more closely we want to cover a sphere the tinier the squares would have to be). The area of a square is proportional to the square of its linear dimensions. Radius is a linear dimension. Thus the proportionality for areas is y = k x^2. By contrast, for volumes or things that depend on volume, like mass or weight, we would use tiny cubes to fill the volume. Volume of a cube is proportional to the cube of linear dimensions. Thus the proportionality for a volume would be y = k x^3. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `q (NOTE: This question is not for Mth 163 students, who may safely ignore it) Explain how you would use the concept of the differential to find the volume of a sandpile of height 5.01 given the volume of a geometrically similar sandpile of height 5, and given the value of k in the y = k x^3 proportionality between height and volume. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** The class notes showed you that the slope of the y = k x^3 graph is given by the rate-of-change function y' = 3 k x^2. Once you have evaluated k, using the given information, you can evaluate y' at x = 5. That gives you the slope of the line tangent to the curve, and also the rate at which y is changing with respect to x. When you multiply this rate by the change in x, you get the change in y. The differential is 3 k x^2 `dx and is approximately equal to the corresponding `dy. Since `dy / `dx = 3 k x^2, the differential looks like a simple algebraic rearrangement `dy = 3 k x^2 `dx, though what's involved isn't really simple algebra. The differential expresses the fact that near a point, provided the function has a continuous derivative, the approximate change in y can be found by multiplying the change in x by the derivative). That is, `dy = derivative * `dx (approx)., or `dy = slope at given point * `dx (approx), or `dy = 3 k x^2 `dx (approx). The idea is that the derivative is the rate of change of the function. We can use the rate of change and the change in x to find the change in y. The differential uses the fact that near x = 5 the change in y can be approximated using the rate of change at x = 5. Our proportionality is y = k x^3. Let y = f(x) = k x^3. Then y' = f'(x) = 3 k x^2. When x = 5 we have y' = f'(5) = 75 k, whatever k is. To estimate the change in y corresponding to the change .01 in x, we will multiply y ' by .01, getting a change of y ' `dx = 75 k * .01. } SPECIFIC EXAMPLE: We don't know what k is for this specific question. As a specific example suppose our information let us to the value k = .002, so that our proportionality is y = .002 x^3. Then the rate of change when x is 5 would be f'(5) = 3 k x^2 = 3 k * 5^2 = 75 k = .15 and the value of y would be y = f(5) = .002 * 5^3 = .25. This tells us that at x = 5 the function is changing at a rate of .15 units of y for each unit of x. Thus if x changes from 5 to 5.01 we expect that the change will be change in y = (dy/dx) * `dx = rate of change * change in x (approx) = .15 * .01 = .0015, so that when x = 5.01, y should be .0015 greater than it was when x was 5. Thus y = .25 + .0015 = .2515. This is the differential approximation. It doesn't take account of the fact that the rate changes slightly between x=5 and x = 5.01. But we don't expect it to change much over that short increment, so we expect that the approximation is pretty good. Now, if you evaluate f at x = 5.01 you get .251503. This is a little different than the .2515 approximation we got from the differential--the differential is off by .000003. That's not much, and we expected it wouldn't be much because the derivative doesn't change much over that short interval. But it does change a little, and that's the reason for the discrepancy. The differential works very well for decently behaved functions (ones with smooth curves for graphs) over sufficiently short intervals.** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q (NOTE: This question is not for Mth 163 students, who may safely ignore it) What would be the rate of depth change for the depth function y = .02 t^2 - 3 t + 6 at t = 30? (instant response not required) YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** You saw in the class notes and in the q_a_ that the rate of change for depth function y = a t^2 + b t + c is y ' = 2 a t + b. This is the function that should be evaluated to give you the rate. Evaluating the rate of depth change function y ' = .04 t - 3 for t = 30 we get y ' = .04 * 30 - 3 = 1.2 - 3 = -1.8. COMMON ERROR: y = .02(30)^2 - 2(30) + 6 =-36 would be the rate of depth change INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: This is the depth, not the rate of depth change. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `qmodeling project 3 problem a single quarter-cup of sand makes a cube 1.5 inches on a side. How many quarter-cups would be required to make a cube with twice the scale, 3 inches on a side? Explain how you know this. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: If ¼ cup = 1 cube 1.5 inches. To make one side you would need 1.5 + 1.5 = 3. That makes one side. Now, if you are making a cube, you would triple that, so 2 quarter cups * 3 = 6. You would need 3 quarter cups to make a cube with 3 inches on a side. confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** You can think of stacking single cubes--to double the dimensions of a single cube you would need 2 layers, 2 rows of 2 in each layer. Thus it would take 8 cubes 1.5 inches on a side to make a cube 3 inches on a side. Since each 1.5 inch cube containts a quarter-cup, a 3 inch cube would contain 8 quarter-cups. COMMON ERROR: It would take 2 quarter-cups. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: 2 quarter-cups would make two 1.5 inch cubes, which would not be a 3-inch cube but could make a rectangular solid with a square base 1.5 inches on a side and 3 inches high. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Shoot!! This is confusing. I thought I was right on this. I am going back up to the instructor comments to see if I can get this……. Ok. You would need 2 quarter cups to make 1 cube. There are 2 layers, with 2 rows of 2 in each layer. So you would need 2 quarter cups to make 1 cube, with 4 cubes total, you would need 8 quarter cups to make a 3 inch cube.
.............................................
Given Solution: ** The proportionality would be y = a x^3, with y = 1 (representing one quarter-cup) when x = 1.5. So we have 1 = a * 1.5^3, so that a = 1 / 1.5^3 = .296 approx. So the model is y = .2963 x^3. Therefore if x = 3 we have y = .296 * 3^3 = 7.992, which is the same as 8 except for roundoff error. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): I should have known to put 1 as y for 1 quarter cup = 1 cube that is 1.5 inches. I reviewed it and understand this now. I will finish this problem below: Y = 1 and x = 1.5 1 = a 1.5^3 1 = 3.375a a = .2963 y = .2963 x^3 x = 3 y = .2963 3^3 y = 8.0001 this would show that model for this problem is y = .2963 x^3 ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qWhat would be the side measurement of a cube designed to hold 30 quarter-cups of sand? What equation did you solve to get this? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: y = .2963 x^3 is the equation to use. y = 30 (for the quarter cups) 30 = .2963 x^3 101.2487 = x^3 x = 4.661 confidence rating #$&*: 3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** You are given the number of quarter-cups, which corresponds to y. Thus we have 30 = .296 x^3 so that x^3 = 30 / .296 = 101, approx, and x = 101^(1/3) = 4.7, approx..** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qquery problem 2. Someone used 1/2 cup instead of 1/4 cup. The best-fit function was y = .002 x^3. What function would have been obtained using 1/4 cup? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: y = .002x^3 ¼ + ¼ = ½ So .002 would double y = .004 x^3 confidence rating #$&*: 3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** In this case, since it takes two quarter-cups to make a half-cup, the person would need twice as many quarter-cups to get the same volume y. He would have obtained half as many half-cups as the actual number of quarter-cups. To get the function for the number of quarter-cups he would therefore have to double the value of y, so the function would be y = .004 x^3. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qquery problem 4. number of swings vs. length data. Which function fits best? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: I used swing lengths 1 - 7 feet. Respective swings were 44, 36, 29, 25, 22, 20, 19. I used a string and a softball. The best fit model that I could find was y = ax^-.5. It was the closest to matching up with my y values of swings. The equation that I got was y = a x^-.5 36 = a(2)^-.5 36 = a7.07 a = 50.92 y = 50.92 x^-.5 An example is y = 50.92 (3^-.5) y = 29.4 y = 50.92 (7^-.5) y = 19.24 All of the others were not as close. confidence rating #$&*: 3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** If you try the different functions, then for each one you can find a value of a corresponding to every data point. For example if you use y = a x^-2 you can plug in every (x, y) pair and solve to see if your values of a are reasonably consistent. Try this for the data and you will find that y = a x^-2 does not give you consistent a values—every (x, y) pair you plug in will give you a very different value of a. The shape of the graph gives you a pretty good indication of which one to try, provided you know the shapes of the basic graphs. For this specific situation the graph of the # of swings vs. length decreases at a decreasing rate. The graphs of y = a x^.p for p = -.3, -.4, -.5, -.6 and -.7 all decrease at a decreasing rate. In this case you would find that the a x^-.5 function works nicely, giving a nearly constant value of a. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qproblem 7. time per swing model. For your data what expression represents the number of swings per minute? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: The best fit model would be y = ax^-.5. The equation that I got was y = 50.92 x^-.5 Examples are in the problem above. confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** The model that best fits the data is a x^-.5, and with accurate data we find that for the case where length is in feet, the values of a is close to 55. If you used alternative instructions you would have measured the pendulum length in cm or inches rather than feet. However the process will be identical, and the model y = a x^-.5 will fit the data just as well. You will just get a different value of a: • If your pendulum lengths were in centimeters, then your value of a would be close to 300. • If pendulum lengths are in inches then your value of a would be close to 190. The model is pretty close to • # per minute frequency = 55 x^-.5. (if lengths are in cm the model would be about 300 x^-.5; if lengths are in inches then the model is about 190 x^-.5) As a specific example let's say we obtained counts of 53, 40, 33 and 26 cycles in a minute at lengths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 feet, then using y = a x^-.5 gives you a = y * x^.5. • Evaluating a for y = 53 and x = 1 gives us a = 53 * 1^.5 = 53 • For y = 40 and x = 2 we would get a = 40 * 2^.5 = 56 • For y = 34 and x = 3 we get a = 33 * 3^.5 = 55 • For y = 26 and x = 4 we get a = 26 * 4^.5 = 52. Since our value of a are reasonably constant the y = a x^.5 model works pretty well, with a value of a around 54. The value of a for accurate data turns out to be about 55 (300 if length is in centimeters, 190 if length is in inches).** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qIf the time per swing in seconds is y, then what expression represents the number of swings per minute? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: You would divide one minute by time per swings in seconds. swings per minute = 1 minute / y (time per swing in seconds) confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** To get the number of swings per minute you would divide 60 seconds by the number of seconds in a swing (e.g., if a swing takes 2 seconds you have 30 swings in a minute). So you would have f = 60 / y, where f is frequency in swings per minute. COMMON ERROR: y * 60 INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: That would give more swings per minute for a greater y. But greater y implies a longer time for a swing, which would imply fewer swings per minute. This is not consistent with your answer. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Ok, I should have done 60 seconds instead of 1 minute. That makes more sense. Oops! ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qIf the time per swing is a x ^ .5, for the value determined previously for the parameter a, then what expression represents the number of swings per minute? How does this expression compare with the function you obtained for the number of swings per minute vs. length? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: You used f as the variable in the previous problem for number of swings per minute, so I am doing the same. Using point (3, 29) f = a x ^-.5 a = 60/y a = 60/29 = 2.07 f = 2.07 x^-.5 f = 2.07 (3^-.5) f = 1.19 confidence rating #$&*: 3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** We will continue to use a for the proportionality constant in our previous frequency model f = a x^-.5.. We will use k for the proportionality constant in the present time-per-swing model T = k x^.5. The constants a and k have a simple enough relationship, since T = 60 / f (which simply says taht time per swing is 60 seconds divided by number of swings in a minute). Time per swing turns out to be k x^.5--this is what you would obtain if you did the experiment very accurately and correctly determined the power function. For x in feet kwill be about 1.1. (if x is in cm then k is about .2; if x in in inches then k is about .32) Since the number of swings per minute is 60/(time per swing), you have f = 60 / (k x^.5), where f is frequency in swings / minute. Simplifying this gives f = (60 / k) * x^-.5. 60/k is just a constant, so the above expression is of form f = a * x^-.5, consistent with earlier statements. For length measured in feet, we have a = 60 / k = 60 / 1.1 = 55, approx., confirming our previous frequency model F = 55 x^-.5. (If length is in cm then a = 60 / k = 60 / .2 = 300, and if length is in inches then a = 60 / k = 190, appxox., again consistent with previouly obtained results.)** STUDENT QUESTION ok but I still don’t under stand or I’m just confusing my self on this whole concept and with different data points I have nothing to compare to, and where did you get the 1.1 data from? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: If you count cycles of a pendulum and make a table of time per swing vs. length in feet, you find that y = a x^.5 is the function that yields a relatively constant value of a. You find this by substituting the various values of time per swing for y, the corresponding value of length in feet for x, and solving for a. A typical table of y = time per swing vs. x = length in feet would be x y 2.8 1.8 2.4 1.7 2.1 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.1 .8 .9 If we calculate a = y / x^.5 for each row of the table we get a = 1.8 / sqrt(2.8) = 1.1 a = 1.7 / sqrt(2.4) = 1.1 etc. Most results are close to 1.1. This confirms that y = a x^.5 is a representative model for this data. If you did the same thing with y = a x^2, or y = a x^-.5, your values of a would be nowhere near constant. The corresponding frequency vs. length table might be x y 2.8 33 2.4 35 2.1 40 1.8 45 1.1 52 .8 66 The model y = a x^.5 wouldn't work here, but the model y = a x ^-.5 would, and the values of a would be close to 55 If you used alternative instructions the numbers on your table will differ from the numbers in this example. However the process will be identical, and the model y = a x^-.5 will fit the data just as well. You will just get a different value of a: • If your pendulum lengths were in centimeters, then your value of a would be close to 300. • If pendulum lengths are in inches then your value of a would be close to 190. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): I understand this, but should I have used different variables as you did? ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok
.............................................
Given Solution: ** You would use your own model here. This solution uses T = 1.1 x^.5. You can adapt the solution to your own model. According to the model T = 1.1 x^.5 , where T is period in seconds and x is length in feet, we have periods T = .1 and T = 100. So we solve for x: For T = .1 we get: .1 = 1.2 x^.5 which gives us x ^ .5 = .1 / 1.2 so that x^.5 = .083 and after squaring both sides we get x = .083^2 = .0069 approx., representing .0069 feet. We also solve for T = 100: 100 = 1.2 x^.5, obtaining x^.5 = 100 / 1.2 = 83, approx., so that x = 83^2 = 6900, approx., representing a pendulum 6900 ft (about 1.3 miles) long. ** Similar steps would be solved if you used the model T = .31 x^.5 for length in inches, or T = .2 x^.5 for length in cm. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `q problem 9. length ratio x2 / x1. What expressions, in terms of x1 and x2, represent the frequencies (i.e., number of swings per minute) of the two pendulums? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: y = 50.92 x^-.5 y = 50.92 x1^-.5 y = 50.92 x2^-.5 confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** The solution is to be in terms of x1 and x2. If lengths are x2 and x1, you would substitute x2 and x1 for L into the frequency relationship. Depending on the form you choose to use for the frequency relationship, you will get one of the following: • f = 60 / (1.1 `sqrt(L)) so f1 = 60 / (1.1 `sqrt(x1) ) and f2 = 60 / (1.1 `sqrt(x2)). [ if L is in cm we would replace 1.1 by .2; if L is in inches we would replace 1.1 by .32 ] • f = 55 L^-.5. Substituting would give you f1 = 55 * x1^-.5 and f2 = 55 * x2^-.5. [ if L is in cm we would replace 55 by 300; if L is in inches we would replace 55 by .190 ] • The general for f = a L^-.5 (same as y = a x^-.5, just using L instead of x) you would get f1 = a x1^-.5 and f2 = a x2^-.5 [ in this case it doesn't matter whether L is in feet, cm or inches] ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Substitute L for x in frequency, and use f1 and f2 instead of y. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qWhat expression, in terms of x1 and x2, represents the ratio of the frequencies of the two pendulums? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: The ratio would be x2/x1 y = 50.92 x^-.5 f2/f1 = (50.92 x2^-.5) / (50.92 x1^-.5) = x2^-.5 / x1^-.5 = (x2/x1)^-.5 confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** This question is to be answered in terms of the symbols x1 and x2. If f = a x^-.5 then f1 = a x1^-.5 and f2 = a x2^-.5. With these expressions we would get f2 / f1 = a x2^-.5 / (a x1^-.5) = x2^-.5 / x1^-.5 = (x2 / x1)^-.5 = 1 / (x2 / x1)^.5 = (x1 / x2)^.5. If you got (x2 / x1)^-.5 your answer is pretty much OK, but standard form for an answer of this nature should be in terms of a positive exponent. Note that it doesn't matter what a is, since a quickly divides out of our quotient. For example if a = 55 we get f2 / f1 = 55 x2^-.5 / (55 x1^-.5) = x2^-.5 / x1^-.5 = (x2 / x1)^-.5 = 1 / (x2 / x1)^.5 = (x1 / x2)^.5. This is the same result we got when a was not specified. This shouldn't be surprising, since the parameter a divided out in the third step. If a = 300 or a = 190, we would still get final result (x1 / x2)^.5.** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Always end in a positive exponent. To finish would be (x2/x1)^-.5 1/ (x2/x1)^.5 (x2/x1)^.5 ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: `qquery problem Challenge Problem for Calculus-Bound Students: how much would the frequency change between lengths of 2.4 and 2.6 feet YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Not sure if I need to do this, but I know how, so I will. y = 50.92x^-.5 y = 50.92(2.4)^-.5 = 32.87 y = 50.92(2.6)^-.5 = 31.58 31.58 - 32.87 = -1.29 confidence rating #$&*: 3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** STUDENT SOLUTION: Note that we are using frequency in cycles / minute. I worked to get the frequency at 2.4 and 2.6 y = 55.6583(2.4^-.5) = 35.9273 and y = 55.6583(2.6^-.5)= 34.5178. subtracted to get -1.40949 difference between 2.4 and 2.6. This, along with the change in length of .2, gives average rate -1.409 cycles/min / (.2 ft) = -7.045 (cycles/min)/ft , based on the behavior between 2.4 ft and 2.6 ft. This average rate would predict a change of -7.045 (cycles/min)/ft * 1 ft = -7/045 cycles/min for the 1-foot increase between 2 ft and 3 ft. The change obtained by evaluating the model at 2 ft and 3 ft was -7.2221 cycles/min. The answers are different because the equation is not linear and the difference between 2.4 and 2.6 does not take into account the change in the rate of frequency change between 2 and 2.4 and 2.6 and 3 for 4.4 and 4.6 y = 55.6583(4.4^-.5) y = 55.6583(4.6^-.5) y = 26.5341 y = 25.6508 Dividing difference in y by change in x we get -2.9165 cycles/min / ft, compared to the actual change -2.938 obtained from the model. The answers between 4-5 and 2-3 are different because the equation is not linear and the frequency is changing at all points. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Not sure if I got all this correct, but I don’t think this was one of my required problems to do. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ok