pearl pendulum

Phy231

Your 'pearl pendulum' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** Your general comment, if any: **

** Your description of the rhythm of the pendulum when tilted 'back' **

Closer together.

** Your description of the rhythm of the pendulum when tilted 'forward' **

Still closer together but not as quickly.

** Your description of the process used to keep the rhythm steady and the results you observed: **

Tilted the bracket forward so that the pearl just touched the bracket.

** Your description of what happened on the tilted surface (textbook and domino), rotating the system 45 degrees at a time: **

0 closer

45 further

90 further

135 further

180 closer

215 closer

270 closer

315 closer

** Your description of how you oriented the bracket on the tilted surface to obtain a steady rhythm: **

At 90 degrees clockwise.

** Your report of 8 time intervals between release and the second 'hit': **

0.422

0.445

0.453

0.421

0.445

0.367

0.320

0.422

Time for bob of pendulum to strike twice the bracket it hangs from when elevated to 45 degrees and released.

** Your report of 4 trials timing alternate hits starting with the second 'hit': **

0.570,0.742,0.570,0.727,0.664

0.508,0.648,0.648,0.688

0.594,0.547,0.516,0.632

0.492,0.523,0.539,0.656

** The length of your pendulum in cm (you might have reported length in mm; the request in your instructions might have been ambiguous): **

9.95cm

** Your time intervals for alternate 'hits', starting from release until the pendulum stops swinging: **

0.541,0.615,0.608

** Your description of the pendulum's motion from release to the 2d hit: **

1

** Your description of the pendulum's motion from the 2d hit to 4th hit: **

2. The second hit requires the pendulum to swing from equilibrium to extreme point and then back to equilibrium.

** Your description of the difference in the pendulum's motion from release to the 2d 'hit', compared to the motion from the 2d 'hit' to the 4th hit: **

3. The second hit and fourth hit have 4 intervals between them since the pearl must swing from equilibrium to extreme point and back for the 2 and 3 hits where the 1st hit only travels from extreme point to equilibrium.

** Your description of the difference in the pendulum's motion from the 2d to the 4th 'hit' compared to the motion from the 4th to 6th hit: **

4. It doesn't differ.

** Your conjecture as to why a clear difference occurs in some intervals vs. others: **

Since it only performs 1/4 cycle where the other hits perform 1/2 cycle.

** What evidence is there that subsequent intervals increase, decrease or remain the same: **

Stay the same until the pendulum loses too much energy due to striking the bracket.

** What evidence is there that the time between 'hits' is independent of the amplitude of the swing? **

It shows that even with a release from a higher position, a pendulum will settle into a steady rhythm for a few strikes (swings) until it loses too much energy and comes to rest. Therefore the pendulum's swing does not depend on how far it swings.

** **

2 hours

** **

&#This looks very good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#