torques

Phy 201

Your 'torques' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** Your optional message or comment: **

** Positions of the three points of application, lengths of systems B, A and C (left to right), the forces in Newtons exerted by those systems, description of the reference point: **

3cm, 10.5cm, 20.5cm

8.5cm, 8.5cm, 8.0cm

6.5N, 14.53N, 4.75N

the left end of the line which was 3cm before the first rubber band

I used my calibration graphs to determine how many cm corresponded to a Newton and then found the Newtons applied based on this graph.

These results show the force in Newtons that each rubber band was acting on the bar.

** Net force and net force as a percent of the sum of the magnitudes of all forces: **

3.28N

13%

These results mean that the upwards force was 3.28N larger then the downward forces.

** Moment arms for rubber band systems B and C **

7.5cm, 9.5cm

These numbers represent the moment arm for B and C.

** Lengths in cm of force vectors in 4 cm to 1 N scale drawing, distances from the fulcrum to points B and C. **

26, 58.12cm, 19cm

-30cm, 38cm

These numbers are representative of the actual scale diagram of the rod.

** Torque produced by B, torque produced by C: **

45.125, -48.75

These are the torques for my B and C rubber band systems.

** Net torque, net torque as percent of the sum of the magnitudes of the torques: **

-3.63

3.8%

This represents my experimental error. The rod was not in equilibrium and actually had a negative torque of -3.63. This was almost 4% error.

** Forces, distances from equilibrium and torques exerted by A, B, C, D: **

7.02, -13.5, -94.77

5.09, -5.96, -30.36

8.93, 8, 71.44

6.55, 10, 65.5

** The sum of the vertical forces on the rod, and your discussion of the extent to which your picture fails to accurately describe the forces: **

0.45

My picture seems to depict the forces fairly well. My net force is close to 0, if anything it would be pulling up on the right.

** Net torque for given picture; your discussion of whether this figure could be accurate for a stationary rod: **

The net torque is 2 so it should move clockwise slightly.

My picture could be close, but the rod would be tilted slightly clockwise so it wouldn't be stationary.

** For first setup: Sum of torques for your setup; magnitude of resultant and sum of magnitudes of forces; magnitude of resultant as percent of sum of magnitudes of forces; magnitude of resultant torque, sum of magnitudes of torques, magnitude of resultant torque as percent of the sum of the magnitudes: **

-19.46

27.59, 10.35

3.5%

11.81, 262.07, 4.5%

These results describe the magnitudes of my picture

** For second setup: Sum of torques for your setup; magnitude of resultant and sum of magnitudes of forces; magnitude of resultant as percent of sum of magnitudes of forces; magnitude of resultant torque, sum of magnitudes of torques, magnitude of resultant torque as percent of the sum of the magnitudes: **

19N

8, 38.6

22%

9%, 209

These represent the forces for my tilted picture.

** In the second setup, were the forces all parallel to one another? **

No, I would say the degrees vary by about 10 degrees. I made the estimates pretty much based on the visual. One of my vectors seems to be tilted slightly.

** Estimated angles of the four forces; short discussion of accuracy of estimates. **

90, 90, 95, 85

I made the estimates based on what I saw. I think they arent very accurate but this is what it seemed. I am sure the 90 degrees shifted slightly, the top (B) to the left and A to the right.

** x and y coordinates of both ends of each rubber band, in cm **

** Lengths and forces exerted systems B, A and C:. **

** Sines and cosines of systems B, A and C: **

** Magnitude, angle with horizontal and angle in the plane for each force: **

** x and y components of sketch, x and y components of force from sketch components, x and y components from magnitude, sine and cosine (lines in order B, A, C): **

** Sum of x components, ideal sum, how close are you to the ideal; then the same for y components. **

** Distance of the point of action from that of the leftmost force, component perpendicular to the rod, and torque for each force: **

** Sum of torques, ideal sum, how close are you to the ideal. **

** How long did it take you to complete this experiment? **

** Optional additional comments and/or questions: **

The set up for the second part of this experiment is basically impossible in my opinion. I tried to make it work but I'm sure the data shows how much trouble i had setting this up. It was definitely frustrating.

Very well done, despite the frustration. Your data are much better than most, among the best I've seen.