pearl pendulum

PHY 201

Your 'pearl pendulum' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** Your general comment, if any: **

** Your description of the rhythm of the pendulum when tilted 'back' **

closer together, rhythm seemed a little more constant.

** Your description of the rhythm of the pendulum when tilted 'forward' **

seemed much more constant

** Your description of the process used to keep the rhythm steady and the results you observed: **

Tilted it so the pearl was just touching the bracket. It struck 12 times.

** Your description of what happened on the tilted surface (textbook and domino), rotating the system 45 degrees at a time: **

The sounds get closer together up to 180d the progressively get further apart until you reach the beginning.

** Your description of how you oriented the bracket on the tilted surface to obtain a steady rhythm: **

So that the end was tilted just enough to make the pearl just touch the mechanism.

** Your report of 8 time intervals between release and the second 'hit': **

.327

.365

.331

.356

.374

.395

.384

.301

The interval was pretty constant. Any deviation can be attributed to timer operator error.

** Your report of 4 trials timing alternate hits starting with the second 'hit': **

.89,.91,.95,.88

.99,.95,.89,.77

1.11,.98,.95,.91,.99

The interval was pretty constant. Any deviation can be attributed to timer operator error.

** The length of your pendulum in cm (you might have reported length in mm; the request in your instructions might have been ambiguous): **

3.5 inches

** Your time intervals for alternate 'hits', starting from release until the pendulum stops swinging: **

.99,.95.93

** Your description of the pendulum's motion from release to the 2d hit: **

0

** Your description of the pendulum's motion from the 2d hit to 4th hit: **

0

** Your description of the difference in the pendulum's motion from release to the 2d 'hit', compared to the motion from the 2d 'hit' to the 4th hit: **

1

** Your description of the difference in the pendulum's motion from the 2d to the 4th 'hit' compared to the motion from the 4th to 6th hit: **

1

** Your conjecture as to why a clear difference occurs in some intervals vs. others: **

** What evidence is there that subsequent intervals increase, decrease or remain the same: **

Should decrease because the rebound is getting shorter due to friction, and the rebound between the pearl material and the metal.

** What evidence is there that the time between 'hits' is independent of the amplitude of the swing? **

** **

1 hr

** **

You don't appear to have answered all the questions in the second half of the document. Please insert your answers, if you haven't already submitted them, into a copy of this document and submit.