#$&*
Phy 201
Your 'ball down ramp' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** #$&* Your general comment **
** #$&* Will a steeper ramp give greater or lesser time? **
Timing Ball down Ramp
The picture below shows a ball near the end of a grooved steel track (this steel track is a piece of 'shelf standard'); the shelf standard is supported by a stack of two dominoes. Your lab materials package contains two pieces of shelf standard; the shelf standard shown in the figure is white, but the one in your kit might be colored black, gold, silver or any of a variety of other colors.
If a ball rolls from an initial state of rest down three ramps with different slopes, the same distance along the ramp each time, do you think the time required to roll the length of the ramp will be greatest or least for the steepest ramp, or will the interval on the steepest ramp be neither the greatest nor the least? Explain why you think you have correctly predicted the behavior of the system.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The ball rolling down the ramp with the greatest slope would have the largest velocity and thus the shortest time. This means that the rise of the ramp is greater than the run, meaning that it is the steepest and will propel the ball at a faster rate.
#$&*
If we write down the slopes from least to greatest, next to the time intervals observed for those slopes, would you expect the time intervals to be increasing or decreasing, or do you think there would be no clear pattern? Explain why you think you have correctly described the behavior of the numbers in the table.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The time intervals at this point would be decreasing, because as slope increases, the time required to roll down the ramp decreases.
#$&*
Set up the shelf standard ramp on a reasonably level table, using a piece of 30-cm shelf standard and a single domino under the high end of the ramp. Position the dominoes so that the last .5 cm of the ramp extends beyond the point where the ramp contacts the domino,.and do the same in all subsequent setups.
Set the bracket on the table, touching the lower end of the ramp so that a ball rolling down the ramp will strike the bracket..
Mark a point about 3 cm below the top end of the ramp. Place a domino on the ramp to its high end is at this point, and place the ball just above the domino, so the domino is holding it back. Quickly pull the domino away from the ball so the ball begins to roll freely down the ramp. Allow the ball to roll until it strikes the bracket.
The bracket will probably move a little bit. Reset it at the end of the ramp.
Determine how far the ball rolled from release until it struck the bracket.
Now repeat, but this time use the TIMER. The first click will occur at the instant you release the ball, the second at the instant the ball strikes the bracket. Practice until you are as sure as you can be that you are clicking and pulling back the domino at the same instant, and that your second click is simultaneous with the ball striking the bracket.
When you are ready, do 5 trials 'for real' and record your time intervals.
Then reverse the system--without otherwise changing the position of the ramp, place the domino under the left end and position the bracket at the right end.
Time 5 trials with the ramp in this position.
In the space below, give the time interval for each trial, rounded to the nearest .001 second. Give 1 trial on each line, so that you will have a total of 10 lines, the first 5 lines for the first system, then 5 lines for the second system.
Beginning in 11th line give a short narrative description of what your data means and how it was collected.
Also describe what you were thinking, relevant to physics and the experiment, during the process of setting up the system and performing the trials.
Your answer (start in the next line):
System 1
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 1.94 1.81 1.90 1.88 1.98
System 2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 1.84 1.90 1.92 1.97 1.88
Five trails were conducted for the ramp system. Next, the ramp was reversed and five more trials were conducted and timed to compare with the first section. Experimentally, special care was taken to ensure that the slope and ramp distance remained the same for both sections of the experiment. Still, it was hypothesized that there would be a slight variation due to human error.
#$&*
Now place two dominoes under the right end and repeat the process, obtaining the time interval for each of 5 trials.
Then place the two dominoes under the left end and repeat once more.
Enter your 10 time intervals using the same format as before.
Your answer (start in the next line):
System 1
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.96 1.02 1.04 1.01 1.02
System 2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.98 1.15 1.20 1.03 1.18
#$&*
Repeat the preceding using 3 dominoes instead of 2. Enter your 10 time intervals using the same format as before.
Your answer (start in the next line):
System 1
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.79 0.84 0.91 0.847 0.88
System 2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.85 0.91 0.89 0.731 0.811
#$&*
Repeat the preceding again, still using the 3 domino setup, but this time place a CD or a DVD disk (or something of roughly similar thickness) on the 'low' end of the ramp. You need time only 5 intervals, but if you prefer you may use 10. Enter your 5 (or 10) time intervals using the same format as before.
Your answer (start in the next line):
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.95 1.01 0.99 0.883 0.91
#$&*
Repeat the preceding one last time, still using the 3 domino setup, but remove the disk and replace it with a piece of paper. You need time only 5 intervals, but if you prefer you may use 10. Enter your 5 (or 10) time intervals using the same format as before.
Your answer (start in the next line):
Trial 1 2 3 4 5
Time(sec) 0.89 0.91 0.79 0.79 0.88
#$&*
Do your results support or fail to support the hypotheses you stated in the first two questions, regarding the relationship between time intervals and slopes? Explain.
Your answer (start in the next line):
For the most part, my hypothesis was supported. There was some variation in between trials, but such small errors are to be expected given the variation in error due to human reaction time. As more dominoes were piled up, the slope increased and the time required for the ball to roll down the ramp lessened. Generally speaking, this meant that the greater the slope the higher the velocity. When a CD was placed under the low end, it slightly decreased the slope and slightly increased the time.
#$&*
How do you think the average velocity of the ball is related to the slope of the ramp? Explain in as much detail as possible.
Your answer (start in the next line):
As the slope increases, so does the steepness of the ramp. When all other factors are kept constant, average velocity appears to be directly related to the slope of the ramp.
#$&*
Speculate on what it is that causes the average velocity on these ramps to change with slope.
Your answer (start in the next line):
This means that whatever object is going down the ramp will speed up as a result of this increase in momentum. Higher slope indicates higher velocity, which means less time required to move from top to bottom.
#$&*
How might you verify whether your speculations are indeed valid explanations?
Your answer (start in the next line):
Through repeated trials and comparison of the standard deviation between each set of data would indicate how much of the pattern was due to chance or experimental error versus valid results to verify the speculations.
#$&*
Do your data conclusively show that the disk made a difference?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The data trend suggests that the disk does make a slight difference; however, given the small difference it may be considered negligible.
#$&*
Do your data conclusively show that the piece of paper made a difference?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The piece of paper is so thin that little difference was expected to be observed. Upon investigation, the difference was again concluded negligible.
#$&*
Imagine that someone is placing different objects below the 'low' end of the ramp, and you are timing the ball. Assume that somehow the object placed below the 'low' end is hidden from you in a way that does not interfere with the timing process. Compared to the thickness of the DVD, how thin would the object have to be before you would be unable, using the TIMER, to observe a difference in times down the ramp?
Answer this question in the first line below. Express your answer in multiples or fractions of the thickness of a disk.
Starting in the second line, explain how you came to your conclusion, based on the results you obtained in this experiment. Also discuss how you could modify or refine the experiment, still using the TIMER, to distinguish the effect of the thinnest possible object placed under the 'low end.
Your answer (start in the next line):
It appears as though 1/2 of a disk would still make a slight difference, but varying thicknesses would need to be assessed before coming to a conclusion. Since the piece of paper showed negligable difference and the disk showed a marked change, objects of varying thicknesses in between the two should be tested in separate trials to investigate the range of sizes that will bear an influence on the time.
#$&*
Had you placed the disk below the 'low' end of the ramp in a 1-domino setup, do you think the difference in times would have been greater or less? Do you think you would be better able distinguish the presence of a thinner object using the 1-domino setup, or the 3-domino setup? Explain your reasoning below:
Your answer (start in the next line):
The difference would have been more marked for the 1 domino because a more significant change in slope would have been made. Lowering a slope of 1 domino would have more of an influence than that of the slope of 3 domino system, and you would be able to distinguish the CD in the 1 domino system with greater ease.
#$&*
Does the ball's velocity change more or less quickly with the 3-domino setup or the 1-domino setup? Explain as best you can how you could use your results to support your answer.
Your answer (start in the next line):
Acceleration measures the change in velocity, and since both systems start the ball with an initial velocity of 0, the 3 domino setup will show a greater acceleration or change in velocity because its final speed is greater.
#$&*
*#&!
&#Very good data and responses. Let me know if you have questions. &#