course Mth 151 {虥|܀˟{assignment #004
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:27:04 `qNote that there are 4 questions in this assignment. `q001. From the collection of letters a, b, c, d, e, how many smaller collections having at least one element may be formed?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) ab, ac, ad, ae, bc, bd, be, cd, ce, de acd, ace, abe, abd, abc, ade, bcd, bce, bde, cde abcd, abde, acde, bcde, abce 5 - 1 element 10 - 2 element 10 - 3 element 5 - 4 element Total is 30 different smaller collections confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:27:59 We will list the original collection by placing its elements between braces: { a, b, c, d, e }. The collection {a, b, c, d} is a smaller collection obtained by eliminating e from the original collection. Similarly we can eliminate d or c or b or a to get the 4-element collections {a, b, c, e}, {a, b, d, e}, { a, c, d, e} and {b, c, d, e}. Alternatively we could simply include either a or b or c or d or e in a 1-element collection, obtaining {a}, {b}, {c}, {d} and {e}. It should be clear that these are the only ways to form collections of 1 or 4 elements. To form a collection of 2 elements we could include a and one other element, obtaining { a, b}, { a, c }, { a, d } and { a, e }. Or we could include b and one other element (excluding a, since we already have the collection { a, b } which is identical to the collection { b, a } since it has exactly the same elements). We obtain { b, c }, { b, d } and { b, e }. {}Or we could include c and one other element (other than a or b, since these have already been listed) to obtain { c, d } and { c, e }. Finally we could include d and the only other element left, e, to get { d, e}. This gives us a complete listing of the 10 sets we can form with 2 of the original elements. This leaves us the 3-element sets, which can be formed by excluding the 2-element sets. Working in reverse order, we can exclude { d, e } to get { a, b, c }, or { c, e } to get { a, b, d }, etc.. The remaining sets we get in this fashion are { a, b, e}, { a, c, d }, { a, c, e}, { a, d, e}, { b, c, d}, {b, c, e}, {b, d, e}, {c, d, e}. We thus have 10 three-element sets. The total number of smaller sets containing at least one element is therefore 5 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 30.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The collection (a,b,c,d,e) has 30 smaller element sets possible self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:33:23 `q002. A one-to-one correspondence between two sets is a rule that associates each element of the each with exactly one element of the other. A natural one-to-one correspondence between the sets { a, b, c } and { 1, 2, 3 } would be to associate a with 1, b with 2, c with 3. This correspondence might be represented as [ a <--> 1, b <--> 2, c <--> 3 ]. This isn't the only possible one-to-one correspondence between these sets. Another might be [ a <--> 2, b <--> 1, c <--> 3 ]. In each case, every element of each set is associated with exactly one element of the other. Another correspondence between the sets might be [ a <--> 3, b<-->2, c<-->3 ]. This correspondence is not one-to-one. In what way does it fail to be a one-to-one correspondence (remember that a one-to-one correspondence is one in which every element of each set is associated with exactly one element of the other).
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> because each set has to associated with exactly one element of the other and in this set a is associated to 3 and c is also associated to 3. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:34:19 [ a <--> 3, b<-->2, c<-->3 ] fails to be a one-to-one correspondence for two reasons. In the first place, 3 is associated with a and with c, and every element of each set is to be associated with exactly one element of the other. 3 is associated with two elements of the other set. It also fails because the element 1 of the second set is not associated with anything in the first set.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> also fails because the element 1 of the second set is not associated with anything in the first set. I did not think of this in this way. self critique assessment: 3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:41:43 `q003. There are four possible one-to-one correspondences between the sets {a, b, c} and {1, 2, 3} which were not described in the preceding exercise. One of them would be [ a <--> 3, b <--> 2, c <--> 1 ]. What are the other three possible one-to-one correspondences?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> [a<->2, b<->1, c<->3] [a<->1, b<->3, c<->2] [a<->1, b<->2, c<->3] confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:45:08 If we designate the correspondence [ a <--> 1, b <--> 2, c <--> 3 ] as the '123' correspondence, [a <--> 2, b <--> 1, c <--> 3 ] as the '213' correspondence and [a <--> 3, b <--> 2, c <--> 1 ] as the '321' correspondence, in each case listing the numbers associated with a, b, c in that order, we see that the remaining three correspondences could be designated 132, 231 and 312. These correspondences could of course be written out as [ a <--> 1, b <--> 3, c <--> 2 ], [ a <--> 2, b <--> 3, c <--> 1 ] and [ a <--> 3, b <--> 1, c <--> 2 ]. Note that 123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321 represent the six ways of rearranging the digits 1, 2, 3 into a 3-digit number, listed in increasing order.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Ok I'm looking at it in a different perspective, I can see what I done wrong self critique assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:46:26 `q004. Explain why it is not possible to put the sets { a, b, c} and {1, 2, 3, 4} into a one-to-one correspondence.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Because in one-to-one correspondence you would have to take away one of the numbers or add a letter to the letter set. You have to have the same number of elements on each set. confidence assessment: 2
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
08:46:54 One set has 3 elements and the other has 4 elements. A 1-to-1 correspondence has to match each element of each set with exactly one element of the other. It would not be possible to find four different elements of the first set to match with the four elements of the second.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> ok I got that one self critique assessment: 2
.................................................