timer program

phy 121

Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** #$&* Your General Comment **

6/8 4pm

** #$&* Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks **

30 minutes.

** #$&*Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks **

It is easy to operate the Timer program. All you have to do is click on the button labeled Click to Time Event.

Click that button about 10 times and describe what you see.

The timer starts automatically on the java application, and when you click the time button, it will clock the time (much like a lap button on a stop watch.)

#$&*

Now click on Initialize Counter, which will clear all the data from the timer window. Click the mouse as fast as you can until the TIMER window fills up. Be sure you get at least 20 time intervals.

If you miss a click, try again. Keep trying until you get at least 20 intervals without a missed or delayed click.

Copy your data starting in the next line:

1 0.438 0.438

2 0.583 0.145

3 0.742 0.159

4 0.983 0.241

5 1.25 0.267

6 1.395 0.145

7 1.516 0.121

8 1.648 0.132

9 1.783 0.135

10 1.927 0.144

11 2.073 0.146

12 2.219 0.146

13 2.339 0.12

14 2.485 0.146

15 2.619 0.134

16 2.77 0.151

17 2.91 0.14

18 3.053 0.143

19 3.191 0.138

20 3.321 0.13

#$&*

You got at least 20 time intervals. Based on your data what was the average of the first 20 time intervals? Note that you could get this average by averaging the first 20 intervals. My first few intervals were .15625, .15625, .1875, .171875, etc; I could just add up the first 20 intervals and divide by 20 to get the average. However there is an easier and quicker way to get the result, so use the easier way if you can.

Give your result, number only, in the first line, and starting in the second line explain how you got it.

.16605

This is greater than the time interval between any two of your quick clicks.

&#As a quick scan of your data shows, the first interval reported above does not correspond to the interval you are timing. A quick scan of the data shows that this interval is inconsistent with the other intervals you observed.

If you included that data in your analysis, your results will be affected. If you look at the valid intervals, and your calculated mean, you will see that your mean doesn't lie 'in the middle' of your valid intervals. Often, in fact, this error leads to a mean interval length that is greater than any of the valid interval lengths.

As long as your calculations are otherwise correct, I'm not going to ask you to resubmit anything However you should make these comparisons yourself, and do submit a revision if you do have questions. To revise, simply insert your revisions, marking each insertion before and after with #### so I can easily identify it. &#

I took the total value from the 20th entry and then divided by 20.

#$&*

When I did this activity the first few lines of my data were as follows:

event number clock time time interval

1 11.67188 11.67188

2 11.875 0.203125

3 12.0625 0.1875

4 12.20313 0.140625

5 12.375 0.171875

6 12.54688 0.171875

7 12.73438 0.1875

8 12.92188 0.1875

9 13.10938 0.1875

10 13.28125 0.171875

11 13.4375 0.15625

It looks like the same intervals keep popping up. For example .1875 seconds occurs 5 times out of the first 10 intervals, .171875 seconds occurs three times, and .203125 seconds, .140625 seconds and .15625 seconds each occur once.

A frequency distribution for my time intervals would be as follows:

time interval frequency

,140625 1

.15625 1

.171875 3

.1875 5

.203125 1

What different time intervals did you observe in your first 20 intervals, and how many times did each occur? List below the different time intervals you observed and the number of times each occurred. List from the shortest to the longest interval, and use a comma between the time interval and its frequency. For example my data above would be listed at

.140625, 1

.1565, 1

.171875, 3

.1875, 5

.203125, 1

Your list should be in exactly this format, with no other symbols or characters.

.12, 1

.121, 1

.13, 1

.132, 1

.134, 1

.135, 1

.138, 1

.14, 1

.143, 1

.144, 1

.145, 2

.146, 3

.151, 1

.159, 1

.241, 1

.267, 1

.438, 1

#$&*

You may make any comments or ask any question about the process so far in the box below

#$&*

On the 10 intervals I've shown you, do you really think I managed to get a time of .1875 seconds, accurate to 4 significant figures, on half of the intervals? If you do, I'm grateful for your confidence but I'm just not that good. No human being has that much neurological and muscular control.

So why do you think the TIMER program reported that time so frequently? Why weren't there times like .1830 seconds, or .1769 seconds? Does this mean that the TIMER program is flawed? Does that mean it's useless?

The timer probably has select output values, one of which being .1875. The timer is not 100% accurate, but most likely will be for our purposes.

#$&*

Here are a few more lines of data, with an added column showing the difference between each time interval and the next.

clock time time interval difference from one time interval to next

9 13.10938 0.1875 -0.01563

10 13.28125 0.171875 -0.01563

11 13.4375 0.15625 0.03125

12 13.625 0.1875 -0.01563

13 13.79688 0.171875 0.015625

14 13.98438 0.1875 0.015625

15 14.1875 0.203125 -0.03125

16 14.35938 0.171875 -0.01563

17 14.51563 0.15625 0.03125

Take a good look at that last column and tell us what you see in those numbers, and what this tells you about the TIMER program

There are very few different values. The timer is set up as an aid to the student, not as an end-all timing program.

#$&*

Now initialize the TIMER once more, and take a series of 10 relaxed breaths. Every time you start to inhale, hit the TIMER button.

My results for the first 7 complete breaths are as follows:

series of relaxed breaths

event number clock time time interval difference between time interval and next

1 1569.734 1569.734

2 1582.75 13.01563 0.32812

3 1596.094 13.34375 3.90625

4 1613.344 17.25 2.70313

5 1633.297 19.95313 1.35937

6 1654.609 21.3125 4.23438

7 1680.156 25.54688 2.15625

8 1707.859 27.70313

I didn't go on because the time between my breaths kept increasing, and I was afraid if I relaxed any more I might stop breathing altogether. It's going to take either more statistical analysis to determine whether that's a real danger, or a little common sense.

Report your results by just entering your time intervals, one to each line, in the box below. If I was entering my results I would enter

13.01563

13.34375

17.25

19.95313

21.3125

etc.

Enter your results in the same format:

4.819

5.32

5.093

4.853

4.881

4.965

5.382

6.042

4.565

5.702

4.969

#$&*

If you have any comments please insert them here

#$&*

Most likely you did not observe the same exact time interval twice, and if you did it did not happen nearly as often as when you did the fact clicks.

Why do you think this is exactly what we would expect?

The output values are rounded to a decimal, and when breathing (something that spans several seconds instead of rapid clicks), it is much more difficult

to get an identical answer.

#$&*

Which of the following statements do you think is the most accurate?

a. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events accurately to within about .1 second.

b. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events accurately to within about .01 second.

c. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events accurately to within about .001 second.

d. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events accurately to within about .0001 second.

Enter your answer and your reasoning below:

C, as I had no 4 decimal answers.

#$&*

Note that the TIMER.exe program can save your data in a format that can be read by a spreadsheet (the TIMER applet cannot do so). This will be very handy in the future, so take a minute and do the following:

1. Click on the button at the lower right of the TIMER form, entitled Click to File Data.

2. A box will pop up allowing you to include an identifying message. You should generally choose to include such a message; for the data presently on your timer that might be 'series of regular breaths time at beginning of inhalation' or something similar. Type in whatever you think would serve as a good identifier for this data and OK that box.

3. A typical Save As window will appear. Decide where to save your data and what to call it, and proceed to save it. The program will save the file as a comma-delimited text file.

4. Open your spreadsheet program (typically Excel) and choose File > Open. Browse to the folder in which you just saved your data. Below the File Name line will be a File Type line; set this either to Text Files or All Files so your file will appear. Open it.

5. A series of windows will typically appear. In the first window make sure the file type chosen is Delimited, the proceed to the next window.

6. In the second window you will see a series of checkboxes; check the one entitled Comma, in order to select the comma-delimited file, then just click on Finish.

Your data should appear in your spreadsheet, and can be manipulated as in any spreadsheet.

Copy a few lines of the data from your spreadsheet below:

Used online timer.

#$&*

Your instructor is trying to gauge the typical time spent by students on these experiments. Please answer the following question as accurately as you can, understanding that your answer will be used only for the stated purpose and has no bearing on your grades:

Approximately how long did it take you to complete this experiment?

&#Good work. See my notes and let me know if you have questions. &#