course Phy 201 ??????????a???vassignment #006
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:04:04 General Physics 1.42. At 1200 liters/day per family how much would level of 50 km^2 lake fall in a year if supplying town of population 40000
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> 1200 liters/day with 4 people/family and = 1200 * .01 cm^3 = .12 m^3/day . 0.12 m^3 * 365 days = .43 m^3/day/year. I am not sure on how to answer the volume, but I will use the equation 'dy * A = volume so .43 m^3/day/year * 50 km^2 = 21.5 cm.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:05:49 ** A liter is 1/1000 of a cubic meter. It can be thought of as a cube 10 cm on a side. To fill a 1-meter cube t would take 10 rows with 10 cubes in each row to make a single layer 10 cm high, and 10 layers to fill the cube--i.e., 10 * 10 * 10 = 1000 one-liter cubes fill a 1-meter cube. A km is 1000 meters so a km^2 is (1000 m)^2 = 10^6 m^2. 1200 liters / day per family, with 40,000 people at 4 persons / family, implies 10,000 families each using 1200 * .001 m^3 = 1.2 m^3 per day. Total usage would be 10,000 families * 1.2 m^3 / day / family * 365 days / year = 4.3 * 10^6 m^3 / year. The volume of the lake corresponding to a depth change `dy is `dy * A, where A is the area of the lake. The area of the lake is 50 km^2 * 10^6 m^2 / km^2 = 5 * 10^7 m^2. `dy * A = Volume so `dy = Volume / A = 4.3 * 10^6 m^3 / (5 * 10^7 m&2) = .086 m or 8.6 cm. This estimate is based on 4 people per family. A different assumption would change this estimate. STUDENT QUESTION: 40000 people in town divided by average household of 4 = 10,000 families 10,000 families * 1200 liters /day = 12000000 liters used per day * 365 days in a year = 4380000000 liter used. Here is where I get confused changing from liters to level of 50 km^2 to subtract. INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: If you multiply the area of the lake by the change in depth you get the volume of water used. You know the area of the lake and the volume of the water used, from which you can find the change in depth. Of course you need to do the appropriate conversions of units. Remember that a liter is the volume of a cube 10 cm on a side, so it would take 10 rows of 10 such cubes to make one layer, then 10 layers, to fill a cube 1 meter = 100 cm on a side. You should also see that a km^2 could be a square 1 km on a side, which would be 1000 meters on a side, to cover which would require 1000 rows of 1000 1-meters squares. If you end of having trouble with the units or anything else please ask some specific questions and I will try to help you clarify the situation. ANOTHER INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The water used can be thought of as having been spread out in a thin layer on top of that lake. That thin layer forms a cylinder whose cross-section is the surface of the lake and whose altitude is the change in the water level. The volume of that cylinder is equal to the volume of the water used by the family in a year. See if you can solve the problem from this model. COMMON ERROR: Area is 50 km^2 * 1000 m^2 / km^2 INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Two things to remember: You can't cover a 1000 m x 1000 m square with 1000 1-meter squares, which would only be enough to make 1 row of 1000 squares, not 1000 rows of 1000 squares. 1 km^2 = 1000 m * 1000 m = 1,000,000 m^2. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I did not correctly calculate several parts to this question. 1. 10 * 10 * 10 = 1000 one-liter cubes fill a 1-meter cube and so my answer whould have been 4.3. Also I did not calculate 10^6 m^2 correctly.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:07:16 univ 1.70 univ sailor 2 km east, 3.5 km SE, then unknown, ends up 5.8 km east find magnitude and direction of 3d leg, explain how diagram shows qualitative agreement
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I do not know how to caluclate this equation
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:07:30 ** Letting the three vectors be A, B and C (C unknown) and the x axis point east we have A at 0 degrees, B at 315 degrees and the resultant at 0 degrees. Ax = 2, Ay = 0 (A is toward the East, along the x axis). Bx = B cos(315 deg) = 2.47, By = B sin(315 deg) = -2.47. Rx = 5.8, Ry = 0. Since Ax + Bx + Cx = Rx we have Cx = Rx - Ax - Bx = 5.8 - 2 - 2.47 = 1.33. Since Ay + By + Cy = Ry we have Cy = Ry - Ay - By = 0 - 0 - (-2.47) = 2.47. C has magnitude sqrt( Cx^2 + Cy^2) = sqrt ( 1.33^2 + 2.47^2) = sqrt(7.9) = 2.8, representing 2.8 km. C has angle arctan(Cy / Cx) = arctan(2.47 / 1.33) = 61 deg. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Alright now I have a better understanding of what is being asked.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:09:31 **** query univ 1.82 (1.66 10th edition) vectors 3.6 at 70 deg, 2.4 at 210 deg find scalar and vector product
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> A * B |A||B| costheta --> AxBx + AyBy + AzBz 3.6 * 2.4* cos (140 dg) = 6.622
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:10:27 ** GOOD STUDENT SOLUTION WITH INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: A * B = |A||B| cos(theta) = AxBx + Ay By + AzBz 3.6 * 2.4 * cos (140 deg) = -6.62 To check for consistency we can calculate the components of A and B: Ax = 3.6 * cos(70 deg) = 1.23 Ay = 3.6 * sin(70 deg) = 3.38 Bx = 2.4 * cos (210 deg) = -2.08 By = 2.4 * sin(210 deg) = -1.2 dot product = 1.23 *-2.08 + 3.38 * -1.2 = -2.5584 + -4.056 = -6.61. Close enough. ---------------------- Cross product: | A X B | = |A| |B| sin (theta) = 3.6 * 2.4 * sin(140) = 5.554. Finding the components we have (Ay * Bz - Az * By) i + (Az * Bx - Ax + Bz) j + (Ax * By - Ay * Bx) k = ((3.38*0)-(0*-1.2)] i + [(0 * -2.08) - (1.23 * 0)] j + [(1.23*-1.2)-(3.38 * -2.08)] k = 0 i + 0 j + 5.55 k, or just 5.55 k, along the positive z axis ('upward' from the plane). INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Your conclusion is correct. The cross product must be at a right angle to the two vectors. To tell whether the vector is 'up' or 'down' you can use your result, 5.55 k, to see that it's a positive multiple of k and therefore upward. The other way is to use the right-hand rule. You place the fingers of your right hand along the first vector and position your hand so that it would 'turn' the first vector in the direction of the second. That will have your thumb pointing upward, in agreement with your calculated result, which showed the cross product as being in the upward direction. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Correct however the value should have come out as negative instead of positive
.................................................
??????????? assignment #007 N????????J???Physics I 06-13-2006
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:14:29 Describe the flow diagram you would use for the uniform acceleration situation in which you are given v0, vf, and `dt.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The first tier would consist ofv0, vf, 'dt and we use those values to locate vAve. We use aAve to find 'dt and 'dv to find a.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:14:33 ** We start with v0, vf and `dt on the first line of the diagram. We use vO and vf to find Vave, indicated by lines from v0 and vf to vAve. Use Vave and 'dt to find 'ds, indicated by lines from vAve and `dt to `ds. Then use `dv and 'dt to find acceleration, indicated by lines from vAve and `dt to a. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Correct
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:15:39 Describe the flow diagram you would use for the uniform acceleration situation in which you are given `dt, a, v0
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The first tier would consist of v0 and 'dv to find vf. The we use vf and v0 to find vAve and then we use 'dt and Vave to find 'ds.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:15:45 ** Student Solution: Using 'dt and a, find 'dv. Using 'dv and v0, find vf. Using vf and vO, find vave. Using 'dt and Vave, find 'ds. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Correct
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:21:53 Explain in detail how the flow diagram for the situation in which v0, vf and `dt are known gives us the two most fundamental equations of motion.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> 'dv = vf-v0 and vAve= (vf + v0) /2 are given when v0 and vf are available. A is found when you divide 'dv into 'dt, leaving us with the equation a = (vf-v0)/'dt. The flow chart also hits as 'dt = vf - v0 and vf = v0 + a. Also, if vAve * 'dt = 'ds. This leads to 'ds = (vf + v0)/2 * 'dt.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:21:57 **Student Solution: v0 and vf give you `dv = vf - v0 and vAve = (vf + v0) / 2. `dv is divided by `dt to give accel. So we have a = (vf - v0) / `dt. Rearranging this we have a `dt = vf - v0, which rearranges again to give vf = v0 + a `dt. This is the second equation of motion. vAve is multiplied by `dt to give `ds. So we have `ds = (vf + v0) / 2 * `dt. This is the first equation of motion Acceleration is found by dividing the change in velocity by the change in time. v0 is the starting velocity, if it is from rest it is 0. Change in time is the ending beginning time subtracted by the ending time. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Correct
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:24:38 Explain in detail how the flow diagram for the situation in which v0, a and `dt are known gives us the third fundamental equations of motion.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> 'dv = a 'dt --> vf= v0 + 'dv = v0 + a 'dt/ --> vAve = (vf + v0)/2 = 'ds = vAve * 'dt.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:25:09 ** a and `dt give you `dv. `dv and v0 give you vf. v0 and vf give you vAve. vAve and `dt give you `ds. In symbols, `dv = a `dt. Then vf = v0 + `dv = v0 + a `dt. Then vAve = (vf + v0)/2 = (v0 + (v0 + a `dt)) / 2) = v0 + 1/2 a `dt. Then `ds = vAve * `dt = [ v0 `dt + 1/2 a `dt ] * `dt = v0 `dt + 1/2 a `dt^2. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I skipped a step or two, but I have the general idea
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:29:02 Why do we think in terms of seven fundamental quantities while we model uniformly accelerated motion in terms of five?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> We think in terms of seven fundamental quantities because we need to add 'dv and vAve to understand acclerated motion with the five quantitie a, 'dt, 'ds, v0, and vf
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:29:05 ** ONE WAY OF PUTTING IT: The four equations are expressed in terms of five fundamental quantities, v0, vf, a, `dt and `ds. However to think in terms of meanings we have to be able to think not only in terms of these quantities but also in terms of average velocity vAve and change in velocity `dv, which aren't among these five quantities. Without the ideas of average velocity and change in velocity we might be able to use the equations and get some correct answers but we'll never understand motion. ANOTHER WAY: The four equations of unif accelerated motion are expressed in terms of five fundamental quantities, v0, vf, a, `dt and `ds. The idea here is that to intuitively understand uniformly accelerated motion, we must often think in terms of average velocity vAve and change in velocity `dv as well as the five quantities involved in the four fundamental equations. one important point is that we can use the five quantities without any real conceptual understanding; to reason things out rather than plugging just numbers into equations we need the concepts of average velocity and change in velocity, which also help us make sense of the equations. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Ok
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:37:42 Accelerating down an incline through a given distance vs. accelerating for a given time Why does a given change in initial velocity result in the same change in final velocity when we accelerated down a constant incline for the same time, but not when we accelerated down the same incline for a constant distance?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Regardless of initial velocity, the the accleration of an incline the rate of velocity will not change. The change in velocity will be less if there is a same distance but a greater speed because there is less time for acceleration to occur.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:37:47 ** If we accelerate down a constant incline our rate of change of velocity is the same whatever our initial velocity. So the change in velocity is determined only by how long we spend coasting on the incline. Greater `dt, greater `dv. If you travel the same distance but start with a greater speed there is less time for the acceleration to have its effect and therefore the change in velocity will be less. You might also think back to that introductory problem set about the car on the incline and the lamppost. Greater initial velocity results in greater average velocity and hence less time on the incline, which gives less time for the car to accelerate. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Correct
.................................................
??????????? assignment #008 N????????J???Physics I 06-13-2006
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:39:45 QUESTION FROM STUDENT--Please define the differnece between Fnet and Force. See if you can answer this question.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Ok
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
19:40:20 ** Net force is the sum of all forces acting on an object. If you're pushing your car you are exerting a force, friction is opposing you, and the let force is the sum of the two (noting that one is positive, the other negative so you end up with net force less than the force you are exerting). Your heart rate responds to the force you are exerting and the speed with which the car is moving; the accel of the car depends on the net force. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Ok
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
20:15:14 In terms of the equations of motion why do we expect that a * `ds is proportional to the change in v^2, and why do we then expect that the change in v^2 is proportional to Fnet `ds?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I am not entirely sure I understand this question, but Fnet = m * a and Fnet * 'ds = k change in velocity
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
20:15:21 ** It's very important in physics to be able to think in terms of proportionality. To say that y is proportional to x is to say that for some k, y = k x. That is, y is a constant multiple of x. To say that a * `ds is proportional to the change in v^2 is to say that for some k, a * `ds = k * ( change in v^2)--i.e., that a * `ds is a constant multiple of the change in v^2. In terms of the equations of motion, we know that vf^2 = v0^2 + 2 a `ds so a `ds = 1/2 (vf^2 - v0^2), which is 1/2 the change in v^2. So a `ds is a constant multiple (1/2) of the change in v^2. Formally we have a `ds = k ( change in v^2) for k = 1/2. Now since Fnet = m a we see that Fnet is proportional to a for a given mass m, and it follows that Fnet `ds = k * change in v^2, for the appropriate k (specifically for k = mass / 2. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Ok
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
20:27:57 How do our experimental results confirm or refute this hypothesis?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Judging from the previous answer to confirm our hypothesis, a linear graph of vf^2 vs. 'ds if 'ds is equal to the change in vf^2.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
20:28:24 ** We didn't actually do this part of the experiment, but on a ramp with fixed slope a `ds is simply proportional to `ds. When we measured `dt for different distances from rest down the same ramp, we were then able to determine the average and final velocities. The change in v^2 for each timing would be from 0 to vf^2. The change would therefore be just vf^2. If a `ds is proportional to the change in vf^2 then a graph of vf^2 vs. a `ds should be linear. Since a is constant we don't even need to determine it--a graph of vf^2 vs. `ds would be linear. This would confirm the hypothesis. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> correct, however a 'ds would be proportional not simply 'ds.
.................................................
"