Assignment 2 Exercises

course Mth 163

Assignment 2 Exercises1. From the previous assignment I determined that the parameters were a=.00534 b= =1.33 and c=63.496

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

To predict the depth when clock time is 46

y=.00534(46^2)+(-1.33)46+63.496

y=.00534(2116)+(-1.33)46+63.496

y=11.299 + -61.18+63.496

y=13.615 cm

When the clock time is 46 seconds the depth is 13.615cm or (36,13.615)

To determine the clock time when the depth reaches 14cm.

14=.00534(t^2)-1.33t+63.496

14-14=.00534t^2-1.33+630496-14

0=.00534t^2-1.33+49.496

t=[1.33+-sqrt(-1.33^2-4(.00534)(49.496)]/2(.00534)

t=[1.33+-sqrt(1.769-1.0592)]/.01068

t=[1.33+-sqrt(.842)]/.01068

(1.33+.842)/.01068=203.37

(1.33-.842)/.01068=45.93

So t=45.93

When the depth reaches 14 cm the clock time will be 45.93 secs.

I believe that the model fits the data well, and the results fit nicely with the predictions on the table.

2. DATA SET 1

I used coordinates (0,1) (10, 1.790569) and (20, 2.118034) for the following model procedure.

Solving for A

1=a(0^2)+b0+c

1.790569=a10^2+b10+c

2.118034=a20^2+b20+c

a+b+c=1

a100+b10+c=1.790569

a400+b20+c=2.118034

a100+b10=1.790569

a0+b0=1

a100+b10=.790569

a400+b20=2.118034

a100+b10=1.79056

a300+b10=.32747

10(a100+b10)=(.790569)10 = 1000a=7.90569

-10(a300+b10)=(.32747)-10= -3000a=-3.2747

-2000a=4.63099

a=-.00232

Solving for B

-.00232(100)+b10=1.790569

-.232+b10=1.790569

b10=2.0226

b=.20226

Solving for C

-.00232(0)+.20226 (0) +c=1

c=1

I have now determined that the parameters are a=-.00232 b=.20226 and c=1

To determine from the model the percent of classes reviewed to schieve grade of 3.0 and 4.0 I will need to solve for t

3=-.00232t^2+.20226t+1

To change it to standard form will subtract 3 from each side.

0=-.00232t^2+.20226t-2

Solving for t

t=[-.20226+-sqrt(.0409-4(-.00232)(-2)]/-.00464

t=(-.20226+.0476)/-.00464=33.332

t=(-.20226-.0476)/-.00464=53.849

t=53.849 will fit best with the model

use the same equation for 4 and the result was t=68.219

Students reviewing 53.849 percent of their assignments could receive a 3.0 GPA and those who reviewed 68.219 percent of their assignment could receive a 4.0 GPA

y=-.00232(80^2)+.20226(80)+1

y=-.00232(6400)+16.1808+1

y=2.3328 grade average

A student reviewing 80% of the assignments could receive a 2.3328 GPA

I did not think that this data set fit the model well. I determined they could only receive a 2.3328 GPA from reviewing 80% but that they could get a 4.0 from only 68.219

so the results were not consistant.

DATA SET 2

From the model we can determine what illumination would be expected at 1.6 Earth distances from the sun.

I used data points (1, 935.1395) (2, 264.4411) (3, 105.1209)

Solve for a

a1^2+b1+c=935.1395

a2^2+b2+6=264.4411

a3^2+b3+6=105.1209

4a+2b=264.4411

1a+1b=935.1395

3a+1b=-670.6984

9a+3b=105.1209

4a+2b=264.4411

5a+1b=-159.3202

1(3a+1b)=-670.6984(1)

-1(5a+1b)=-159.3202(-1)

3a=-670.6984

-5a=159.3202

a=255.6891

Solve for b

255.6891(4)+b2=264.4411

1022.7564+b2=264.4411

b2=-758.3153

b=379.15765

Solve for c

(255.6891)1^2+c=935.139

255.6891+379.15765+c=935.1395

c=300.29275

The parameters for the model are a=255.6891 b=379.15765 and c=300.29275

To determin the illumination I must solve for t

935.1395=255.6891t^2+379.15765t+300.29275

0=255.6891t^2+379.15765t-634.84675

t=[-379.15765+-sprt(143760.5236-649293.4766)/511.3782

t=-379.15765+-sqrt(143110.5878)]/511.3782

t=-379.15765+378.299/511.3782=-.00168

t=-379.15765-378.299/511.3782=-1.481

t=-1.481 fit the model the best

y=255(2.0107)-267.389+300.29275

y=545.73225

The illumination at 1.6 Earth distance would be 545.73225.

The range of 25 to 100 Watts per square meter would fall in the 3-6 AV range.

This set of data fit the model very well.

"

Your work here is excellent. Note, however, that it's probably easier for you to use the Query program, which includes problem statements and asks specific questions about selected problems, than to submit the problems in this format. Only the Query is required. You aren't required to submit problems in this format.

However if you prefer this format, however, it's fine with me.

a