Your work on timer program has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
Going slow but things are starting to get easier.
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
It is giving me the number of times that I've clicked in the 1st column. In the 2nd it's giving me a time since I first clicked the timer button and the 3rd column is giving me the interval between clicks.
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
test1
event number,clock time,time interval
1 , 1574.547 , 1574.547
2 , 1574.719 , 0.171875
3 , 1574.875 , 0.15625
4 , 1574.992 , 0.1171875
5 , 1575.148 , 0.15625
6 , 1575.258 , 0.109375
7 , 1575.367 , 0.109375
8 , 1575.539 , 0.171875
9 , 1575.695 , 0.15625
10 , 1575.867 , 0.171875
11 , 1576.031 , 0.1640625
12 , 1576.141 , 0.109375
13 , 1576.305 , 0.1640625
14 , 1576.469 , 0.1640625
15 , 1576.641 , 0.171875
16 , 1576.75 , 0.109375
17 , 1576.859 , 0.109375
18 , 1577.078 , 0.21875
19 , 1577.188 , 0.109375
20 , 1577.297 , 0.109375
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.1375
Just added and divided.
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.171875,4
.15625,3
.1171875,1
.109375,7
.1640625,3
.21875,1
Your general comment to this point
Interesting.
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
I noticed all my numbers ended in a '5'. Maybe it's just set to round to the nearst number up to a 10 millionth. It doesn't mean the program is useless but one should be aware of the + and - factor when seeking accurate data.
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
That it must work on some sort of rounding interval.
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
4.945313
6.421875
6.101563
6.867188
6.484375
7.078125
7.359375
7.640625
7.40625
Your general comment to this point:
My relaxed breaths were alot shorter than yours! None of the intervals were the same.
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
The longer the interval the less likely it would be to acheive the same interval at random chance.
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
I would say 'b' is most likely, simply because the frequency under 1 second could be within I believe the nearest 100th but with the repetitive data past that just don't belive that it could be any more accurate past that.
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
timer breath
event number clock time time interval
1 5113.672 5113.672
2 5118.617 4.945313
3 5125.039 6.421875
4 5131.141 6.101563
5 5138.008 6.867188
6 5144.492 6.484375
************* If this note appears your assignment might not have been reviewed, no matter what it might say on the next line. You should notify your instructor; if you simply copy the contents of the Address box of your Internet browser and that address using the Submit Work form, your instructor will be able to find the file and verify that your work has been properly reviewed.
Your responses have been reviewed and everything looks good.
Please let me know if you have any questions related to this orientation assignment.
Your work on timer program has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
Going slow but things are starting to get easier.
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
It is giving me the number of times that I've clicked in the 1st column. In the 2nd it's giving me a time since I first clicked the timer button and the 3rd column is giving me the interval between clicks.
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
test1
event number,clock time,time interval
1 , 1574.547 , 1574.547
2 , 1574.719 , 0.171875
3 , 1574.875 , 0.15625
4 , 1574.992 , 0.1171875
5 , 1575.148 , 0.15625
6 , 1575.258 , 0.109375
7 , 1575.367 , 0.109375
8 , 1575.539 , 0.171875
9 , 1575.695 , 0.15625
10 , 1575.867 , 0.171875
11 , 1576.031 , 0.1640625
12 , 1576.141 , 0.109375
13 , 1576.305 , 0.1640625
14 , 1576.469 , 0.1640625
15 , 1576.641 , 0.171875
16 , 1576.75 , 0.109375
17 , 1576.859 , 0.109375
18 , 1577.078 , 0.21875
19 , 1577.188 , 0.109375
20 , 1577.297 , 0.109375
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.1375
Just added and divided.
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.171875,4
.15625,3
.1171875,1
.109375,7
.1640625,3
.21875,1
Your general comment to this point
Interesting.
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
I noticed all my numbers ended in a '5'. Maybe it's just set to round to the nearst number up to a 10 millionth. It doesn't mean the program is useless but one should be aware of the + and - factor when seeking accurate data.
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
That it must work on some sort of rounding interval.
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
4.945313
6.421875
6.101563
6.867188
6.484375
7.078125
7.359375
7.640625
7.40625
Your general comment to this point:
My relaxed breaths were alot shorter than yours! None of the intervals were the same.
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
The longer the interval the less likely it would be to acheive the same interval at random chance.
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
I would say 'b' is most likely, simply because the frequency under 1 second could be within I believe the nearest 100th but with the repetitive data past that just don't belive that it could be any more accurate past that.
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
timer breath
event number clock time time interval
1 5113.672 5113.672
2 5118.617 4.945313
3 5125.039 6.421875
4 5131.141 6.101563
5 5138.008 6.867188
6 5144.492 6.484375
Good work
Further discussion of TIMER results is posted at access site 11-61-241. Please follow up by going to that site so you can get in on that discussion.