#$&* course Mth 173 7/16 11 010. Income Streams
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThe total money flow would be $20,000 per year for 6 years, or $120,000. 8% simple interest for 3 years would be 3 * 8% = 24%, and 24% of $120,000 is $28,800, so your first estimate would be $28,800. You therefore expect to end up with something not too far from $148,800. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Even though I got the same answer as the given solution, I used a different method of achieving the answer. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q002. Money usually doesn't earn simple interest. Interest is almost always compounded. If the interest on $120,000 was compounded annually at 8% for 3 years, what would be the final amount? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: When compounding the interest, you simply take the compounded interest rate and multiply it by the given amount. In this case, it would be $120,000 multiplied by 0.08 which gives you a result of $9,600. When this is added to the $120,000, you get a result of $129,600. Since this amount is compounded annually, you can simply add 1 to the interest rate, and multiply that by the $120,000, which gives you the same result. Since this method is just as effective, I decided to use that for the remainder of the years. $129,600 * 1.08 = $139,968 $139,968 * 1.08 = $151,165.44 confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 3
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThere is a more efficient way to calculate this, but we'll see that shortly. 8% of $120,000 is $9600, so after 1 year we will have $120,000 + $9600 = $129,600. Note that this result could have been obtained by multiplying $120,000 by 1.08. We will use this strategy for the next two years. After another year we will have $129,600 * 1.08 = $139,968. If you wish you can take 8% of $129,600 and add it to $129,600; you will still get $139,968. After a third year you will have $139,968 * 1.08 = $151,165. Note that this beats the $148,800 you calculated with simple interest. This is because each year the interest is applied to a greater amount than before; previously the interest was just applied to the starting amount. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): OK. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q003. Money can earn interest that is compounded annually, quarterly, weekly, daily, hourly, or whatever. For given interest rate the maximum interest will be obtained if the money is compounded continuously. When initial principle P0 is compounded continuously at rate r for t interest periods (e.g., at rate 8% = .08 for t years), the amount at the end of the time is P = P0 * e^(r t). If the $120,000 was compounded continuously at 8% annual interest for 3 years, what would be the amount at the end of that period? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Concerning this problem, the formula (with all variables replaced) would read P = (120,000) * e^(0.08*3) which gives you a final amount of $152,549. This again is higher than the previous amount of $151,165. This is because the amount was compounded continuously confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `aWe would have P0 = $120,000, r = .08 and t = 3. So the amount would be P = $120,000 * e^(.08 * 3) = $120,000 * e^(.24) = $152,549. This beats the annual compounding by over $1,000. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): OK. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q004. This keeps getting better and better. We end up with more and more money. Now let's see how much money we would really end up with, if the money started compounding continuously as soon as it 'flowed' into the account. As a first step, we note that 6 years is 72 months. About how much would the money flowing into the account during the 6th month be worth at the end of the 72 months? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Since the amount of time that you want to find the amount of continuous interest for is 6 months, the first step is to divide the $120,000 by 6 which gives you a result of 20,000. Then you take the $20,000 and divide it by 12 since the 6 represents months instead of years. This then gives you an amount of $1,666.67. This is the amount that grows throughout the remainder of the time period. If you begin counting the time from the beginning of the 6th month to the end of the 72 months, then the amount of time that the money has to grow is 67 months, but if you count from the end of the 6th month to the end of the 72 months, then it will only get to grow for 66 months. This means that some money will get to grow for 67 months, and some of the money will get to grow 66 months. In this case, instead of figuring the total amount for both amounts of time, I just took the average between the 2, which is 66.5. Once you have found this number, you take it and divide it by 12, which gives you the actual number of years that the money has to grow. In this instance, the number of years is 5.54. Then you can take these values and insert them into the function. P = P0 * e^(rt) P = (1,666.67) * e^(0.08*5.54) P = $2,596.14 confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `aFlowing into the account at a constant rate of $20,000 per year, we see that the monthly flow is $20,000 / 12 = $1,666.67. From the beginning of the 6th month to the end of the 72nd month is 67 months. From the end of the 6th month to the end of the 72nd month is 66 months. The $1666.67 flow into the account between the beginning and the end of the 6th month. Some of this money has as much as 67 months to grow, and some as little as 66 months. The growth isn't linear, but we won't be far off if we 'split the difference' and assume that the $1666.67 grows for 66.5 months. 66.5 months is 66.5/12 = 5.54 years, approximately. So the $1,666,67 would grow at the continuous rate of 8 percent for 5.54 years. This would result in a principle of $1,666,67 * e^(.08 * 5.54) = $2596.14. STUDENT COMMENT: I don’t really know why we would use the midpoint of the month. Is that exactly when the money “flows in?” INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: That's pretty much it, though the word 'exactly' isn't quite accurate. We want to use a single time to indicate 'when' the money can be regarded as being 'in' the account. Since money 'flows in' from the beginning of the month to the end, the midpoint of the month is a better choice than either the beginning of the end. STUDENT QUESTION I am confused on why 5.54 was used for the time to me it seems like if we are starting with 6 years and subtract the first 6 months we should be looking at a time interval of 5.5 years??????????? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE The interval runs from t = 5 months to t = 6 months before the end. The midpoint of the interval is at t = 5.5 months. On the average the money that flows in during this interval grows for 66.5 months. Or as stated in the given solution: 'Some of this money has as much as 67 months to grow, and some as little as 66 months. The growth isn't linear, but we won't be far off if we 'split the difference' and assume that the $1666.67 grows for 66.5 months.' &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): OK ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q005. How much will the money flowing into the account during the 66th month be worth at the end of the 72 months? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Since the amount is still monthly, you would use the amount of $1,666.67 and put that into the function. P = (1,666.67) * e^(.08*6/12) P = $1,734.68 (I used the number 6/12 for the amount of time because the difference between the 66th month and the 72nd month. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2
.............................................
Given Solution: `aAgain $1,666,67 would flow into the account during this month. The midpoint of this month is 65.5 months after the start of the 72-month period, so the money will have an average of about 6.5 months, or 6.5 / 12 = .54 years, approx., to grow. Thus the money that flows in during the 66th month will grow to $1,666,67 * e^(.08 * .54) = $1737, approx.. STUDENT QUESTION I don’t understand why you can’t calculate monthly since it is broken down to 1666.67 monthly. Also why didn’t we convert back to yearly after finding 5.54 yearly.???? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE $1666.67 'flows in' during the month. We use the monthly rate to calculate this. Then the money grows for about .54 years. For convenience and understanding we used the number of months to calculate the number of years. Since the interest rate is a yearly rate, we use it with the time in years. We could have used the monthly interest rate with the number of months. 8% / 12 = .667%, or .00667. Our calculation would be $1666.67 * e^(.000667 * 6.5). Because of roundoff with the .667% this comes out around $1740, a little higher than our original result. STUDENT QUESTION I am confused on why 5.54 was used for the time to me it seems like if we are starting with 6 years and subtract the first 6 months we should be looking at a time interval of 5.5 years? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE The interval runs from t = 5 months to t = 6 months before the end. The midpoint of the interval is at t = 5.5 months. On the average the money that flows in during this interval grows for 66.5 months. Or as stated in the given solution: 'Some of this money has as much as 67 months to grow, and some as little as 66 months. The growth isn't linear, but we won't be far off if we 'split the difference' and assume that the $1666.67 grows for 66.5 months.' &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): #######I’m confused as to why 6.5 years was used instead of 6 years. I understand that in the previous question why the 66.5 was used, but I’m not sure why the 6.5 was used in this question.######## ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThe amount in 1 year is $20,000 so the amount in `dt years is $20,000 * `dt. Money that flows in a little before or a little after the instant t years from the beginning of the 6-year period will have (6-t) years, a little more or a little less depending on 'before' or 'after', to grow. STUDENT QUESTION (6-t) , does this mean that it has anywhere between the beginning and the end of the 6 year span??? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE From the t year instant to the end of the 6-year period, the number of years that intervene, and during which the money in question can grow, is 6 - t. For example, money that flows into the account during the few days prior to the t-year instant has a little more than 6 - t years to grow; money that flows in during the first few days after this instant has a little less than 6 - t years to grow. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): At first, when the (6-t) was introduced, I was extremely confused why it was stated in this manner. I mean, why does the money that was introduced prior to the t-instant have anywhere from 6-t years to grow? But when I reread the given solution and the student question, I understood where it came from. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: `aAmount P0 will grow to P0 e^( r t) in t years, so in 6-t years amount $20,000 `dt will grow to $20,000 `dt e^(.08 (6-t) ). &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): OK. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q008. So for a contribution at t years from the beginning of the 6-year period, at what rate would we say that money is being contributed to the final t = 6 year value? Let y stand for the final value of the money, and `dy for the contribution from the interval `dt. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Since the function for ‘dy is ‘dy = 20,000 ‘dt * e^(.08)(6-t), you divide the function for ‘dy by the function for ‘dt. ‘dy/’dt = [(20,000 ‘dt) *e^(.08)(6-t)] / [20,000 e^(.08)(6-t)] ‘dy/’dt = 0 confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThe money that flows in during time interval `dt will grow to `dy = $20,000 `dt * e^(.08 (6-t) ), so the rate is about `dy / `dt = [ $20,000 `dt * e^(.08 (6-t) ) ] / `dt = $20,000 e^(.08 ( 6-t) ). As `dt shrinks to 0, this expression approaches the exact rate y ' = dy / dt at which money is being contributed to the final value. STUDENT COMMENT: I do not really understand the last statement in the solution. INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: This explanation leaves out some technicalities, but the last statement comes down to something very much like the following: The shorter the time interval `dt, the closer everything in the interval is to the midpoint and the less the rate varies over the interval. For both of these reasons, the approximation improves greatly as `dt shrinks. If `dt keeps shrinking, it approaches zero and the approximation approaches an exact value. STUDENT QUESTION why could we not use 20000 * e ^.08 (6-t) where t = 6 because it’s the last year and the interest wont increase because it goes in last? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE We are only talking about the amount that flows in during some unspecified time interval `dt, presumed to be a short interval. $20 000 is the amount that flows in during a year, not during the interval `dt. The amount of money that 'flows into' the account during time interval `dt is $20 000 / year * `dt. Assuming `dt is in years, and taking for granted that the amount is in dollars, we just write this as 20 000 * `dt. STUDENT QUESTION Why is t not just always 0 if we are looking for a change as t approaches 0?????? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE This is a very good question, and a universal point of confusion. It confused Western Civilization for thousands of years (see also 'Zeno's Paradox'). It's `dt that approaches zero. If all the `dt's are zero then the total amount is zero. We don't care about the obvious (and uniformative) thing that happens when all the `dt's are zero; what we care about is what happens as `dt approaches zero. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ##########This question was really confusing to me. I wasn’t really sure how to answer it or what my answer meant. Please explain this a little bit more.######## ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThe rate function is the derivative of the quantity function. An antiderivative of a rate-of-change function is a change-in-quantity function. We therefore calculate the total change in a quantity from the rate function by finding the change in this antiderivative. STUDENT COMMENT: I am not sure what this question is asking. I do know that y’ refers to the derivative, but I know that as the rate of change. Is it that same as the rate at which the money accumulates? And to find the total accumulation, wouldn’t we just use the rate function, which I guess would be the antiderivative of the derivative we just found? INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Very good. Just a little clarification: y ' is the rate of change of y with respect to t. Since y is the future value of the money flow, y ' is the rate of change of future value with respect to clock time. That would indeed be what we mean in this context by 'the rate at which the money accumulates'. For the 6-year cycle, the rate at which future value is accumulating is y = dy/dt = $20,000 e^(.08 ( 6-t) ). y ' is the derivative of y, so y is an antiderivative of y '. So you are right about the antiderivative. STUDENT QUESTION why would we need the ant derivative? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE What we know is the derivative function y ' of the accumulating amount function y. We know y ' and we want to find y. That is, we know the derivative and we want to find the function of which this is the derivative. STUDENT QUESTION Is there a difference in the antiderivative and the Integral???? I don’t think there is but I am concerened that I have mixed up the meaning of the integral…. INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE This isn't something you're expected to know just yet (soon but not right now), but along with many students in this course you have apparently already had a calculus course. To clarify: An antiderivative is a function; the term is pretty much equivalent to 'definite integral'. The definite integral is the change in value of an antiderivative function. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `q010. If the money that flows into the account t years along the 6-year cycle adds to the final value of the money at the previously mentioned rate y' = dy / dt = 20,000 e^(.08(6-t)), then what function describes the final value of the money accumulated through time t? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Calculating the antiderivative: Y’ = dy/dt = 20,000 e^(.08(6-t)) Y’ = dy/dt = 20,000 e^(.08*6) * e^(.08*t) Y’ = dy/dt = 20,000 * .48e^(.08) Y’ = dy/dt = 9600 * e^(.08) confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `aThe function must be an antiderivative of the rate function y ' = $20,000 e^(.08 ( 6-t) ). The y ' function can be expressed as y ' = $20,000 e^(.08 * 6) e^(-.08 t) = $20,000 * 1.616 e^(-.08 t) = $32,321 e^(-.08 t). At this point the qa gets a little ahead of itself, since the course hasn't yet introduced you to the chain rule (coming up very soon in the qa's), much less to antidifferentiation (coming up later in the course). However it will be worth your time to make a note of this solution and come back to it after your introduction to integration, about 2/3 of the way through the course. And if you've had a calculus course you should be in a position to understand this now (just remember to think in terms of the chain rule): The general antiderivative of e^(-.08 t) is -1/.08 e^(-.08 t) + c = -12.5 e^(-.08 t) + c. The general antiderivative of y ' = $32,321 e^(-.08 t) is y = $32,321 * -12.5 e^(-.08 t) + c = -404,012.5 e^(-.08 t) + c. The value of the constant c could be determined if we knew, for example, the amount of money present at t = 0. However as we will see in the next step, the value of c doesn't affect the change in the quantity we are considering in this problem. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ##########In this question, I’m not really sure where the 1.616 came from. I multiplied nearly every number in the function, and I still can’t get that result. Where exactly did it come from?######### ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: y represents the money accumulated through t years. We subtract the money accumulated at 0 years from the money accumulated at 6 years to get the amount accumulated during the time interval from t = 0 to t = 6 years. The result is -404,160 e^(-.08 * 6 ) + c - [ -404,160 e^(-.08 * 0 ) + c ] = $154,072. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): #######Yet again, I got close to the same answer as the given solution, but not the exact same numbers. I’m not really sure where the -404,160 came from, because that is not the same value I got in the previous question.###### ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: