course Mth 174 b}¸ý̿؉¿¾ƒ®¾À‘ûŠÀÓÕassignment #003
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:15:52 query 6.5 #8 Galileo: time for unif accel object to traverse dist is same as if vel was ave of init and final; put into symbols and show why true
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I understood what the statement was saying but it was difficult for me to be able to put it into symbols but this is what I came up with: -gt + v0t + s0 = (-gt^2)/2 + v0t + s0
t = s / [ (vf + v0)/2 ].
An object accelerating for time t, starting with initial velocity v0 at t = 0, has velocity function
v = v0 + a * t
and position function
s = .5 a t^2 + v0 t,
assuming that s = 0 at t = 0.
Both of these results are easily obtained, for the given initial condition that initial velocity is zero, by a straightforward integration of the acceleration function (to get the velocity function) then the velocity function (to get the position function).
For given displacement s we can solve the position equation for t. The equation is rearranged to the form of a standard quadratic:
.5 a t^2 + v0 t – s = 0, with solutions
t = (-v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s) ) / a ).
Substituting this into the velocity function we obtain the final velocity:
Final velocity
= v0 + a t = v0 + a * (-v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s) / a)
= +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s) .
The average of the initial and final velocities is therefore
ave. of init and final vel = (initial vel + final vel) / 2 = (v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s)) / 2.
Traveling at this velocity for time t = (-v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s) ) / a ) the displacement will be
Displacement = average velocity * time of travel
= ( v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s)) (-v0 +- sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a s) ) / a ) / 2
The numerator is the product of the sum and the difference of two quantities and simplifies to 2 a s. The denominator is 2 a so the expression simplifies to just s.
This confirms that the distance traveled is the same as the distance that would be traveled at the average of the initial and final velocities.
Alternative solution:
For uniform acceleration the velocity function can be expressed as
v0 + a t.
Integrating this function between clock times t1 and t2 we obtain the displacement s:
s =
1/2 a (t2^2 – t1^2) + v0 ( t2 – t1).
Dividing the integral (i.e., the displacement) by the length of the interval we get the average value of the function—i.e., the average velocity. The length of the interval is t2 – t1 so
displacement / interval =
Integral / interval =
(1/2 a (t2^2 – t1^2) + v0 ( t2 – t1)) / (t2 – t1) =
1/2 a ( t2 + t1) + v0.
The initial value of the velocity on the interval is v0 + a t1, the final velocity v0 + a t2, so the average of initial and final velocities is
Ave of init and final velocity =
(v0 + a t1 + v0 + a t2) / 2 =
v0 + 1/2 a ( t1 + t2).
This is identical to the expression obtained previously.
Thus the average of the initial and final velocities is equal to the average velocity on the interval, and the result is proven.</h3>
Still another solution:
If an object is dropped from rest and falls for time t it will reach velocity vf = a t. So the average of its initial and final velocities will be
Ave of init and final vel =(vf + v0) / 2 = (32 t + 0) / 2 = 16 t.
The distance fallen is known to be
s = 16 t^2.
But this is exactly the distance the object would travel in time t if its average velocity was 16 t. Thus the two quantities are identical.
A numerical example for a given s:
When s = 100, then, t is the positive solution to 100 = 16 t^2. This solution is t = 2.5.
The velocity function is v = a t. We have to find v when s = 100. When s = 100, we have t = 2.5, as just seen. So v = a t = 32 * 2.5 = 80, representing 80 ft/sec.
Now we know that s = 100, vf = 80 and v0=0. Substituting into t = s / [ (vf + v0)/2 ] we get t = 100 / [ (80 + 0) / 2 ] = 100 / 40 = 2.5.
This agrees with the t we got using s = .5 a t^2. **
Another argument:
The average value of any linear function over an interval is equal to the average of its initial and final values over the interval.
In a nutshell, because the v vs. t graph is linear, the average velocity is equal to the average of the initial and final velocities.
Since
time of fall = displacement / average velocity,
it follows that
time of fall = displacement / (ave of initial and final vel).
This latter expression is just the time that would be required to fall at a constant velocity which is equal to the average of initial and final velocities.
More rigorously:
The graph is linear, so the area beneath the graph is the area of a triangle.
The base of the triangle is the time of fall, and its altitude is the final velocity.
By a simple construction we know that the area of the triangle is equal to the area of a rectangle whose length is equal to the base of the triangle, and whose width is equal to half the altitude of the triangle.
It follows that the area of the triangle is equal to half the final velocity multiplied by the time interval.
Since the initial velocity is 0, the average of initial and final velocities is half the final velocity.
So the area of the triangle is the product of the time of fall and the average of initial and final velocities
area beneath graph = time of fall * ave of init and final vel
The area beneath the graph is equal to the integral of the velocity function over the time interval, which we know is equal to the displacement. So we have
displacement = time of fall * ave of init and final vel, so that
time of fall = displacement / ave of init and final vel.
This leads to the same conclusion as above.
The same argument, expressed more symbolically:
A graph of v vs. t graph is linear. Over any time interval t = t1 to t = t1 + `dt, displacement is represented by the area of the corresponding trapezoid, which is d = (v1 + v2) / 2 * `dt.
Solving for `dt we again obtain `dt = d / [ (v1+v2)/2 ].
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:17:53 how can you symbolically represent the give statement?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> -gt + v0t + s0 = (-gt^2)/2 + v0t + s0 I used part b of the problem to show why this is true. Since the object dropped from a 100ft building accelerating from rest: -32(0) + (0) + 100 = (-32(0))/2 + (0) + 100 100 = 100
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:17:58 How can we show that the statement is true?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> -gt + v0t + s0 = (-gt^2)/2 + v0t + s0 I used part b of the problem to show why this is true. Since the object dropped from a 100ft building accelerating from rest: -32(0) + (0) + 100 = (-32(0))/2 + (0) + 100 100 = 100
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:19:05 How can we use a graph to show that the statement is true?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> You can make a graph with the x-axis being position and the y-axis being time.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:30:43 query problem 7.1.22 (3d edition #18) integral of `sqrt(cos(3t) ) * sin(3t)
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> integral of `sqrt(cos(3t) ) * sin(3t) u= cos3t, du= -sin3t dx
w = cos (3t) dw = -3 sin (3t)
so that sin(3t) = -dw / 3.
Thus our expression becomes
w^(1/2) * (-dw / 3).
The integral of -1/3 w^(3/2) with respect to w is -1/3 * (2/3) w^(3/2), treating w^(1/2) as a power function.
This simplifies to
-2/9 w^(3/2) or
-2/9 * (cos(3t))^(3/2).
The general antiderivative is
-2/9 * (cos(3t))^(3/2) + c,
where c is an arbitrary constant.**
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:31:56 what did you get for the integral and how did you reason out your result?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> integral of `sqrt(cos(3t) ) * sin(3t) u= cos3t, du= -sin3t dx - integral of (u)^1/2 du = - 2/3 (u) ^3/2 du= -2/3 (cos3t)^3/2 + C I used u=cos3t because 3t is not a seperate function and the derivative is part of the original problem (sin3t).
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:35:10 query problem 7.1.20 (3d edition #21) antiderivative of x^2 e^(x^3+1)
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> antiderivative of x^2 e^(x^3+1) u=x^3 + 1, du= 3x^2dx so du/3 = 1/3 1/3 integral of e^u du = 1/3 e^ (x^3 1) + C
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:35:15 what is the antiderivative?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> antiderivative of x^2 e^(x^3+1) u=x^3 + 1, du= 3x^2dx so du/3 = 1/3 1/3 integral of e^u du = 1/3 e^ (x^3 1) + C
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:35:27 What substitution would you use to find this antiderivative?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> u=x^3 + 1, du= 3x^2dx so du/3 = 1/3
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:06:43 query problem 7.1.37 (3d edition #35) antiderivative of (t+1)^2 / t^2
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I tired different ways to get the answer that was in the back of the book, t + 2lnt - 1/t + C, and could never reach it. I tried u= t+1 du = 1dx and t = u - 1but ended up with integral of (u)^2 / (u - 1) ^2 = u^2 (u - 1)^2du= -1/3 (t + 1)^3 (t + 1)^-1 + C I also tried u=t^2, du = 2tdx and ended up with: 1/2 integral of (t + 1) ^2 / u = 1/2 lnu (t + 1)^2 = 1/2 lnt^2 1/3(t + 1) ^3= 1/5 ln t^2 ( t + 1) ^3 + C I think whatever I am doing wrong here is the same problem I had with other problems in the book. When do you solve for the variable with u?
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:06:47 what is the antiderivative?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE -->
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:06:51 What substitution would you use to find this antiderivative?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE -->
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:15:24 query 7.1.64 (3d edition #60). int(1/(t+7)^2, t, 1, 3)
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> int(1/(t+7)^2= u= t + 7 du = 1dx when t = 1, u = 8 when t = 3, u =10 = du / (u^2) dx = lnIu^2I = ln I10^2I - ln I8^2I = .4462
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:15:29 What did you get for the definite integral?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> int(1/(t+7)^2= u= t + 7 du = 1dx when t = 1, u = 8 when t = 3, u =10 = du / (u^2) dx = lnIu^2I = ln I10^2I - ln I8^2I = .4462
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:15:42 What antiderivative did you use?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> when t = 1, u = 8 when t = 3, u =10
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:15:58 What is the value of your antiderivative at t = 1 and at t = 3?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> int(1/(t+7)^2= u= t + 7 du = 1dx when t = 1, u = 8 when t = 3, u =10 = du / (u^2) dx = lnIu^2I = ln I10^2I - ln I8^2I = .4462
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:18:16 query 7.1.86. World population P(t) = 5.3 e^(0.014 t).
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE -->
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:21:54 What were the populations in 1990 and 2000?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> P = 5.3e^.014t P= 5.3 e^.014t It would stay the same for 1990 because t already = time since 1990. t= 10 for 200 because it is 10 years after 1990 so: P = 5.3e^.014(10) P= 5.3e^ .14
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:34:04 What is the average population between during the 1990's and how did you find it?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Integral from 10 to 1 of 5.3 e^.014t u= .014t du = .014 dx = du/.014 = 1/.014 when t = 10, u = .14 when t = 1, u = .014 so 1/.014 integral from .14 to .014 of 5.3e^ u du = 1/.014 * 5.3^u du = 2650 / 7 e^u = 2650 / 7 e ^ .014t = (2650 / 7 e^ .014 * .14) - (2650 / 7 e^ .014 * .014) = 379.314 - 378.645 = .669 billion In 1990, t = 0 so the population is P(0) = 5.3 billion
In 2000, t = 10 so the population is P(10) = 6.1 billion
To find the average population we integrate the population function over the 10-year interval, then divide by the 10 years:
An antiderivative of 5.3 e^(0.014 t) is found by letting u equal the ‘inner function’ of the composite:
u = .014 t so
du = .014 dt and
dt = du / .014.
Thus the expression 5.3 e^(0.014 t) dt becomes 5.3 e^u * du / .014.
An antiderivative of e^u with respect to u is just e^u, so the antiderivative of the function is
5.3 e^u / .014 = 380 e^u, approximately. In terms of t this is
380 e^(.014 t).
At t = 0 this antiderivative would have value about 380.
At t = 0 your antiderivative would have value about 435.
The change in the value of the antiderivative is therefore about 435 – 380 = 55.
The change in the antiderivative is the definite integral of the function.
The average value of the function is equal to its definite integral divided by the time interval:
average value = 56.89 / 10 = 5.689.
This is quite close to, but a little less than the average of the initial and final populations.
It is less because the exponential function is concave upward, and the population curve therefore 'dips' below the straight line connecting the initial and final points.
However the curvature on this interval is not pronounced, and the function never 'dips' far below the straight line, so the average is close to the straight-line average you gave in your initial solution.</h3>
INCORRECT IF NOT UNREASONABLE ANSWER:
The average population seems as if it would be the average of the two, therefore
6.1 + 5.3/ 2 = 5.7 billion
INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE:
Review the definition of the average value of a function:
The average value of a function over an interval is equal to its integral over that interval, divided by the length of the interval.
Now if the function is linear, then the average of its initial and final values is equal to its average value (see the above given solution to the Galileo problem). However:
If the function is not linear, it is very unlikely that the average of its initial and final values is equal to its average value
If the function has nonzero positive or negative concavity on the entire interval it will never have an average value equal to the average of its initial and final values.
The exponential function is not linear, and is in fact concave upward on this interval, so averaging initial and final values on the interval won't work here.
You have to integrate the function and divide by the 10-year interval of integration
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:35:00 What is the value of your antiderivative at t = 1 and at t = 3?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I used t = 1 and t = 10 since there are 10 years difference in 1990 and 2000.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:36:05 Query Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE -->
.................................................