Assignment 15

course MTH 158

These were so hard!!!

Good work.

Let me know if anything is unclear, and include specifics about what you do and do not understand.

‰{kÇ…±ò³¦µ_”Ê… ª’Î÷ϯaò~é¨Ùû College Algebra 10-10-2005

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:07:31 **** query 1.7.20 (was 1.2.30). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) million to lend at 19% or 16%, max lent at 16% to average 18%.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> let x=amount lent at 16%. what is leftover will be the amount lent at 19%: 1,000,000 - x. the interest on the first loan is 16% so we have .16x and the second we have .19(1,000,000 - x). since both loans must yield a return of 18%, 18% of 1,000,000 is 180,000. set up an equation and solve for x. .16x + .19 (1,000,000 - x ) = 180,000 multiply both sides by 100 to get rid of decimals: 16x + 19(1,000,000 - x) = 18,000,000 16x + 19,000,000 - 19x = 18,000,000 -3x = -1,000,000 x=333,333

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:08:31 ** Good. The details: If x is the amount lent at 16%, then the amount lent at 19% is 1,000,000 - x. Interest on x at 16% is .16 x, and interest on 1,000,000 - x at 19% is .19 (1,000,000 - x). This is to be equivalent to a single rate of 18%. 18% of 1,000,000 is 180,000 so the total interest is 1,000,000. So the total interest is .16 x + .19(1,000,000 - x), and also 180,000. Setting the two equal gives us the equation .16 x + .19(1,000,000 - x) = 180,000. Multiplying both sides by 100 to avoid decimal-place errors we have 16 x + 19 ( 1,000,000 - x) = 18,000,000. Using the distributive law on the right-hand side we get 16 x + 19,000,000 - 19 x = 18,000,000. Combining the x terms and subtracting 19,000,000 from both sides we have -3 x = 18,000,00 - 19,000,000 so that -3 x = -1,000,000 and x = -1,000,000 / (-3) = 333,333 1/3. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> right

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:16:21 **** query 1.7.36 (was 1.2.36). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) 3 mph current, upstream takes 5 hr, downstream 2.5 hr. Speed of boat?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I guess this is # 26. since distance = velocity * time you have to find the corresponding numbers and enter them to solve. let x = the speed of the boat upstream it takes 5 hours (time) and velocity is x -3 since you are going against the current. downstream it takes 2.5 hours and veloctiy is x+3 because you are going with the current. You are going the same speed the entire time so they are equal to each other. 5(x-3) = 2.5(x+3) 5x - 15 = 2.5x + 7.5 2.5x = 22.5 x=9

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:17:00 STUDENT SOLUTION: Speed of the boat is 9 mph, I used the equation 5(x - 3) = 2.5(x + 3) Reasoning is that it took 5 hours for the boat to travel against the 3mph current, and then traveled the same distance with the 3mph current in 2.5 hours. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Good. The details: If we let x be the water speed of the boat then its actual speed upstream is x - 3, and downstream is x + 3. Traveling for 5 hours upstream, at speed x - 3, we travel distance 5 ( x - 3). Traveling for 2.5 hours downstream, at speed x + 3, we travel distance 2.5 ( x + 3). The two distance must be the same so we get 5 ( x - 3) = 2.5 ( x + 3) or 5 x - 15 = 2.5 x + 7.5. Adding -2.5 x + 15 to both sides we get 2.5 x = 22.5 so that x = 22.5 / 2.5 = 9. So the water speed is 9 mph. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> right

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:24:55 **** query 1.7.32 (was 1.2.42). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) pool enclosed by deck 3 ft wide; fence around deck 100 ft. Pond dimensions if pond square, if rectangular 3/1 ratio l/w, circular; which pond has most area?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I had a hard time with this one. For the square pond, if the fence is 100 feet long you know it's sides are 25 ft each. 25 - 6 (2*3 the width of the deck) = 19. A = lw A= 19* 19 = 361 I worked the circular and rectangular pond several times and couldn't come up with a solution that worked. rectangle: l = 3w A = l *w a = 3w * ?

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:27:38 ** If the deck is circular then its circumference is C = 2 pi R and its radius is r = C / (2 pi). C is the 100 ft length of the fence so we have R = 100 ft / ( 2 pi ) = 50 ft / pi. The radius of the circle is 3 ft less, due to the width of the deck. So the pool radius is r = 50 ft / pi - 3 ft. This gives us pool area A = pi r^2 = pi ( 50 / pi - 3)^2 = pi ( 2500 / pi^2 - 300 / pi + 9) = 524, approx.. If the pool is square then the dimensions around the deck are 25 x 25. The dimensions of the pool will be 6 ft less on each edge, since each edge spans two widths of the deck. So the area would be A = 19 * 19 = 361. The perimeter of the rectangular pool spans four deck widths, or 12 ft. The perimeter of a rectangular pool is therefore 12 ft less than that of the fence, or 100 ft - 12 ft = 88 ft. If the pool is rectangular with length 3 times width then we first have for the 2 l + 2 w = 88 or 2 (3 w) + 2 w = 88 or 8 w = 88, giving us w = 11. The width of the pool will be 11 and the length 3 times this, or 33. The area of the pool is therefore 11 * 33 = 363. The circular pool has the greatest area, the rectangular pool the least. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> how do you know they are asking for perimeter rather than area for the rectangle? The final question is which has the most area. I copied this down on paper and will have to study it in order to get a better understanding of it. This helps.

You are looking for the area, but the constraint is that the perimeter must be 100. You are given the perimeter, you're not trying to find it. You're using it along with the other information to find the area.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:33:31 **** query 1.7.44 (was 1.2.54). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) 20 lb bag 25% cement 75% sand; how much cement to produce 40% concentration?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> let x = amount of pure cement to add if bag is 20 lbs. and 25% of that is cement, then 5 lbs is cement and 15 lbs. sand. Final amount of cement is 5 lb + x final amount of sand is 15 lb final amount of total mixture is 20 lb + x This must all = 40% according to the problem. (5 + x) /( 20 + x) = .40 5 + x = 8 + .40x 500 + 100x = 800 + 40x 60x = 300 x = 5

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:34:05 ** If x stands for the amount of cement added then we have the following: Original amount of cement in bag is 25% of 20 lb, or 5 lb. Original amount of sand in bag is 75% of 20 lb, or 15 lb. The final amount of cement will therefore be 5 lb + x, the final amount of sand will be 15 lb and the final weight of the mixture will be 20 lb + x. The mix has to be 40%, so (amt of cement) / (total amt of mixture) = .40. This gives us the equation (5 + x) / (20 + x) = .40. Multiplying both sides by 20 + x we have 5 + x = .40 ( 20 + x ). After the distributive law we have 5 + x = 80 + .40 x. Multiplying by 100 we get 500 + 100 x = 800 + 40 x. Adding -40 x - 500 to both sides we have 60 x = 300 so that x = 300 / 60 = 5. We should add 5 lbs of cement to the bag. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> right

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:37:24 **** query 1.7.52 (was 1.2.60). Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text): without solving what's wrong with prob how many liters 48% soln added to 20 liters of 25% soln to get 58% soln?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> I don't know for sure about this one. I don't think it's possible because if you add both together, the other solvent will be a majority rather than the ethanol.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

15:38:35 ** Solution from Previous Student and Instructor Comment: It's not possible, adding a 25% solution to a 48% solution is only going to dilute it, I don't really know how to prove that algebraically, but logically that's what I think. (This is much like the last problem, that I don't really understand). INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Right but the 48% solution is being added to the 25% solution. Correct statement, mostly in your words Adding a 48% solution to a 25% solution will never give you a 58% solution. Both concentrations are less than the desired concentration. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> ok, still a little above my head, even with the explanation. What she said about diluting the mixture makes sense though.

You are starting with a 48% solution. You are trying to get a 58% solution, which is stronger. However you are trying to do this by adding a weaker solution, which can't make the solution stronger.

.................................................