Assignment 6

#$&*

course Mth 151

I am truly sorry. I know that I am VERY behind. I have a lot going on with my family, but that is not an exuse I know there are NO EXCUSES for not doing work. But I will say math is VERY DIFFICULT for me and since it is online this semester that is REALLY making it HARDER for me. But I will try my best to do what I can to pass. I know I pass this class if I just do my work and pass my tests. -Thank You

Question: `qQuery 1.1.4 first 3 children male; conclusion next male. Inductive or deductive?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Inductive. No one really knows if the next child will be a boy or a girl.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** The argument is inductive, because it attempts to argue from a pattern. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.8 all men mortal, Socrates a man, therefore Socrates mortal.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Deductive. Since all men mortal.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** this argument is deductive--the conclusions follow inescapably from the premises.

'all men' is general; 'Socrates' is specific. This goes general to specific and is therefore deductive.

COMMON ERROR: because it is based on a fact, or concrete evidence.

Fact isn't the key; the key is logical inevitability. The argument could be 'all men are idiots, Socrates is an man, therefore Socrates is an idiot'. The argument is every bit as logical as before. The only test for correctness of an argument is that the conclusions follow from the premises. It's irrelevant to the logic whether the premises are in fact true. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.20 1 / 3, 3 / 5, 5/7, 7/9, ... Probable next element.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Deductive. Does follow a pattern.

confidence rating #$&*:: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a**The numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 are odd numbers. We note that the numerators consist of the odd numbers, each in its turn. The denominator for any given fraction is the next odd number after the numerator.

Since the last member listed is 7/9, with numerator 7, the next member will have numerator 9; its denominator will be the next odd number 11, and the fraction will be 9/11.

There are other ways of seeing the pattern. We could see that we use every odd number in its turn, and that the numerator of one member is the denominator of the preceding member.

Alternatively we might simply note that the numerator and denominator of the next member are always 2 greater than the numerator and denominator of the present member. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

@&

&#Your response did not agree with the given solution in all details, and you should therefore have addressed the discrepancy with a full self-critique, detailing the discrepancy and demonstrating exactly what you do and do not understand about the parts of the given solution on which your solution didn't agree, and if necessary asking specific questions (to which I will respond).

&#

*@

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.23 This problem wasn't assigned, but you should be able to make a good attempt: 1, 8, 27, 64, ... What is the probable next element?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

125

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** This is the sequence of cubes. 1^3 = 1, 2^3 = 8, 3^3 = 27, 4^3 = 64, 5^3 = 125.

The next element is 6^3 = 216.

Successive differences also work:

1 8 27 64 125 .. 216

7 19 37 61 .. 91

12 18 24 .. 30

6 6 .. 6 **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.36 11 * 11 = 121, 111 * 111 = 12321 1111 * 1111 = 1234321; next equation, verify.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

It will be 11111*11111= 123454321 because a 1 keeps being added to the end of every sequence.

confidence rating #$&*:3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** We easily verify that 11111*11111=123,454,321 **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qDo you think this sequence would continue in this manner forever? Why or why not?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

Yes because numbers never stop going. They go on and on forever.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** You could think forward to the next few products: What happens after you get 12345678987654321? Is there any reason to expect that the sequence could continue in the same manner?

The middle three digits in this example are 8, 9 and 8. The logical next step would have 9, 10, 9, but now you would have 9109 in the middle and the symmetry of the number would be destroyed. There is every reason to expect that the pattern would also be destroyed. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.46 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 2000 by Gauss' method

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

confidence rating #$&*::

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** Pair up the first and last, second and second to last, etc.. You'll thus pair up 1 and 2000, 2 and 1999, 3 and 1998, etc..

Each pair of numbers totals 2001.

Since there are 2000 numbers there are 1000 pairs. So the sum is 2001 * 1000 = 2,001,000 **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

@&

&#You did not answer the given question. You need to always at least explain what you do and do not understand about the question. A phrase-by-phrase analysis is generally required when you cannot otherwise answer a question.

&#

*@

*********************************************

Question: `qQuery 1.1.55 (previously 1.1.57) 142857 * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. What happens with 7? Give your solution to the problem as stated in the text.

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

confidence rating #$&*::

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** Multiplying we get

142857*1=142857

142857*2= 285714

142857*3= 428571

142857*4=571428

142857*5= 714285

142857*6=857142.

Each of these results contains the same set of digits {1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8} as the number 1428785. The digits just occur in different order in each product.

We might expect that this pattern continues if we multiply by 7, but 142875*7=999999, which breaks the pattern. **

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique Rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qWhat does this problem show you about the nature of inductive reasoning?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

In inductive reasoning the pattern continues, but previously it was stated that the pattern broke.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** Inductive reasoning would have led us to expect that the pattern continues for multiplication by 7.

Inductive reasoning is often correct it is not reliable. Apparent patterns can be broken. **

"

end document

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

*********************************************

Question: `qWhat does this problem show you about the nature of inductive reasoning?

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Your solution:

In inductive reasoning the pattern continues, but previously it was stated that the pattern broke.

confidence rating #$&*: 3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.............................................

Given Solution:

`a** Inductive reasoning would have led us to expect that the pattern continues for multiplication by 7.

Inductive reasoning is often correct it is not reliable. Apparent patterns can be broken. **

"

end document

Self-critique (if necessary):

------------------------------------------------

Self-critique rating:

#*&!

@&

Good answers on many questions, but you should also see the notes I've inserted regarding self-critique.

*@