ic_class_091118

course phy 121

11/22 10:30 pm

Think about the following:Imagine you're in a car going counterclockwise around a circular path. Is the center of the circle to your right, your left, behind you, in front of you, or none of these? If you slam on your brakes, it what direction do you observe that coffee cup on the seat next to you move? Relative to the circle, in what direction does it move? In what direction does the road surface push the car?

Experiment

Balance a 31-cm ramp (which you should measure accurately) on the edge of a domino, with a stack of dominoes at one end of the ramp. Observe the distance between the balancing point and the nearest edge of the stack.

Repeat of stacks of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... dominoes.

`q001.

For each number of dominoes, give your raw data:

^^^^

Number of dominoes cm to the closest side

1 10.5 cm

2 9 cm

3 8 cm

4 7 cm

5 6 cm

6 5.5 cm

7 5 cm

8 4.5 cm

9 4.25 cm

10 4 cm

11 3.5 cm

&&&&

For each stack, find the distance from the fulcrum (i.e., the domino on which the system is balanced) to the center of the ramp.

The width of a domino is 2.5 cm, length is 5 cm.

Assuming each domino has a mass of 20 grams, find the torque exerted by the stack.

Assuming the full weight of the ramp acts downward from the center of the ramp, use the fact that net torque is zero to find its mass.

For each number of dominoes, give the distance of the middle of the ramp from the fulcrum, then the mass you calculated for the ramp. Use one line for each number of dominoes.

^^^^

1.5 cm, 40 g

4 cm, 60 g

5 cm, 80 g

6 cm, 100 g

7 cm, 120 g

7.5 cm, 140 g

8 cm, 160 g

8.5 cm, 180 g

8.75 cm, 200 g

9 cm, 220 g

9.5 cm, 240 g

&&&&

Explain in detail how you calculated the mass of the ramp for the stack containing 3 dominoes

^^^^

One domino = 20 g so I multiplied the 20 by 3 and got 60 g

&#See the appended document for details and/or discussion of the solution.

&#

&&&&

What are the sources of uncertainty in this experiment? For which stack do you think the uncertainty in your determination of the mass was least, and what is the basis for your answer?

^^^^

First stack has bound to be the closest

The last stack is bound to be the most

I am not sure how I was supposed to figure the mass out I know that it would be what ever the mass of the ramp is plus the # of dominoes * 20 g

&#See the appended document for details and/or discussion of the solution.

&#

&&&&

Geosychronous satellite

A geosychronous satellite orbits the Earth once per day. The period of the orbit is therefore 24 hours.

We want to find the radius r of this orbit.

Recall that by setting centripetal force equal to gravitational force we find the velocity of a circular orbit of radius r is

• v = sqrt( G * M_earth / r).

The velocity of an orbit is also v = `ds / `dt, where `ds is the distance around the orbit and `dt the time requires to complete an orbit. The circumference of the orbit is 2 pi r so

• v = 2 pi r / period.

We therefore have two equations in the unknowns v and r. We can easily solve the equations simultaneously to determine r. Setting our two expressions for v equal, we eliminate v and obtain the equation

• sqrt( G * M_earth / r) = 2 pi r / period

which we easily solve for r, obtaining

• r = ( G * M_earth * period / (4 pi^2) ).

`q002. What are the radius and velocity of a geosychronous orbit?

^^^^

Radius = cuberoot(Gm_earth*peorid)/4`pi^2

cubroot((6.67 *10^-11)(Nm^2/kg^2)* (6*10^24 kg)*24hours))/(4`pi^2)

287,239

you don't specify units in your result, but to get standard units your hours would need to be converted to seconds

Velocity = 1 cycle/ 24 hours

= 1/86400 rev/s

That's an angular velocity, but it's not the translational velocity of the satellite in its orbit.

&&&&

Don't do the calculation, but explain how you would use your information to calculate the total mechanical energy (total mechanical energy = PE + KE) of the orbit.

^^^^

&#See the appended document for details and/or discussion of the solution.

&#

&&&&

Getting used to negative PE

Let's assume that everyone in this discussion has the same mass.

If you are at the bottom of the well and I am at the opening to the well, you will easily come to the conclusion that my PE is greater than yours, since you would have to do work against gravity to get to my position.

You might choose to think that your PE is zero and that mine is positive.

I might choose to think that my PE, since I'm on the surface, is zero and yours is negative.

Either of us would be right, but without a common reference point we would come to very different conclusions about PE.

For example a guy halfway down the well would have negative PE according to my reference point, and positive according to yours. We might agree on how much PE he would lose if he fell to your position, or how much he would gain if he climbed up to mine, but if we want to describe his PE in terms of a single number, we won't be able to do it.

Suppose we agree to use my perspective: PE is zero at the surface of the Earth.

Then the guy halfway down has negative PE, and you have even more negative PE. Both PE's are negative, but yours has the greater magnitude. At the same time your PE is less than his; since your negative number has greater magnitude, it's further 'below zero' than his, so it's less.

Just as we agreed to use the surface of the Earth as the reference point for the example of the well, we need to agree on a reference point for orbital PE. In this case our reference point is 'far, far away'. In fact it's the limit of 'far, far away', an infinite distance.

If we agree to measure PE relative to infinity, then we use the formula PE = - G M m / r. This formula takes care of the fact that g keeps changing (which makes m g h irrelevant since you don't know what value to use for g).

Using this formula everything has negative potential energy. The smaller the value of r, the greater the magnitude of the PE, so things closer to the center of the Earth have a negative PE which less than (but of greater magnitude than) the PE they would have if they were further.

This is analogous to the example of the well. If you're on the surface of the Earth you now have a big negative PE; if you're in orbit halfway to the Moon you have a negative PE but not as big as the one you had on the surface; and to go from a bigger negative PE to a smaller negative PE, your PE has to increase. Put another way, your PE at the surface is 'way below zero'; halfway to the Moon it's still below zero, but not as far below, and to get there your PE must increase.

`q003. Earth's mass is about 6 * 10^24 kg. The Moon's mass is about 1/60 times the mass of the Earth. The two are separated by about 370 000 km.

• What is the gravitational force exerted on the Moon by the Earth?

^^^^

1.47 *10^25 N

&&&&

• What therefore is the acceleration of the Moon toward the Earth?

^^^^

3.97 m/s^2

&&&&

• What is the acceleration of the Earth toward the Moon?

^^^^

2.45 m/s^2

&&&&

• What is the radius of a circle if a point traveling around the circle once every 28 days has the acceleration you calculated in the preceding exercise?

^^^^

370,000 km

&&&&

• If the Moon were to move 10 000 km closer to the Earth, what average force would act on it during this interval?

^^^^

3.08 *10^26 N

&&&&

• How much work would gravity do on the Moon during this interval?

^^^^

3.08 *10^26 N * 360,000,000 m = 1.11 *10^35 J

&&&&

• By approximately how much would its gravitational PE change as a result?

^^^^

1.11 *10^35 J

&&&&

• By how much would its PE relative to infinity change?

^^^^

Not by a whole lot

&&&&

• How much energy would it take to move the Moon to a very great distance from the Earth?

^^^^

A lot

&&&&

• What is the Moon's moment of inertia in its orbit around the Earth?

^^^^

1/60 * 6*10^24 kg * 370000000 m^2

= 6.9*10^38 kg m^2

Your first line should have read

1/60 * 6*10^24 kg * (370000000 m)^2.

This is in fact what you actually calculated.

&&&&

• What are the angular velocity and angular momentum of the Moon's orbit?

^^^^

.000073 rad/s

8.42 *10^-10 rad/s^2

&&&&

• What is the KE of the Moon's orbit?

^^^^

½ * 6.9*10^38 kg m^2 (.000073 rad/s)^2

= 2.09 *10^30 J

&&&&

You didn't show how you got most of these results. Check the appended solutions.

`q004. What is the velocity of a satellite in a low-Earth orbit at a distance of 7000 km from the center of the Earth?

^^^^

V = squr(Gm_earth/r)

= squr ((6.67 *10^-11(Nm^2/kg^2) * (6 *10^24 kg))/ 7,000,000 m)

= 7561.1 rad/s

&&&&

What are the KE and PE of this orbit?

^^^^

What is the mass of this satellite?

&&&&

If a satellite changes from a circular orbit at 7000 km from the center of the Earth, to a circular orbit at 7001 km, what is `dKE between the orbits and what is `dPE?

^^^^

Very little

&#See the appended document for details and/or discussion of the solution.

&#

&&&&

How much work must have therefore be done on the system by nonconservative forces?

^^^^

?

&#See the appended document for details and/or discussion of the solution.

&#

&&&&

`q005. The Moon's orbit around the Earth is actually elliptical, with its closest approach occurring around 360 000 km and its furthest distance around 380 000 km.

No significant nonconservative forces act on the Moon in its orbit.

Does the Moon gain or lose KE as it moves from the 380 000 km distance to the 360 000 km distance?

^^^^

Gains because the gravitational force is greater on the moon at 360 000 kg.

&&&&

How much KE does it gain or lose? (hint: you should start by calculating the Moon's PE at both points; you should not start by assuming that the Moon moves between two circular orbits with radii 380 000 km and 360 000 km)

^^^^

- ((6*10^24 / 60 kg)( 6*10^24 kg) / (380,000 km) = -1.58 *10^42

- ((6*10^24 / 60 kg)( 6*10^24 kg) / (360,000 km) = - 1.67*10^42

-1.58 *10^42 - - 1.67*10^42 = 8.77 *10^40 J

&&&&

`q006. An object moves around a circle with radius r = 100 cm at velocity v = 50 cm/s and centripetal acceleration a_cent = 25 cm/s^2.

Sketch the radial, velocity and centripetal acceleration vectors corresponding to angular position theta = 45 degrees. Sketch the x component of the radial vector.

Sketch auxiliary axes to determine the directions of the velocity and centripetal acceleration vectors, and using the auxiliary axes sketch the x components of each of these vectors.

Describe your sketch in detail:

^^^^

Everything takes place in the first quad. Looks just like some we have done in class, just at 45 degs.

&&&&

Estimate the x component of each vector. Give your estimates below.

^^^^

Radial vector est. = 65 cm

Vel vector est. = -35 cm/s

A_cent vector est. = - 16 cm/s^2

&&&&

Using sines and/or cosines as appropriate, calculate the x component of each vector.

Give your calculations below

^^^^

Radial vector = 70.7 cm

Vel vector = - 35.3 cm/s

A_cent vector = - 17.7 cm/s^2

&&&&

Repeat for angles theta = 90 deg, 135 deg, 180 deg, 225 deg, 270 deg, 315 deg and 360 deg.

List the x components of the radial vector for angles 45 deg, 90 deg, 135 deg, 180 deg, 225 deg, 270 deg, 315 deg and 360 deg.

^^^^

Deg comp

45 70.7 cm

90 0 cm

135 - 70.7 cm

180 - 100 cm

225 - 70.7 cm

270 0 cm

315 70.7 cm

360 100 cm

&&&&

List the x components of the velocity vector for angles 45 deg, 90 deg, 135 deg, 180 deg, 225 deg, 270 deg, 315 deg and 360 deg.

^^^^

Deg comp

45 35.3 cm/s

90 50 cm/s

135 -35.3 cm/s

180 0 cm/s

225 -35.3 cm/s

270 -50 cm/s

315 35.3 cm/s

360 0 cm/s

&&&&

List the x components of the centripetal acceleration vector for angles 45 deg, 90 deg, 135 deg, 180 deg, 225 deg, 270 deg, 315 deg and 360 deg.

^^^^

Deg comp

45 17.7 cm/s^2

90 0 cm/s^2

135 -17.7 cm/s^2

180 -25 cm/s^2

225 -17.7 cm/s^2

270 0 cm/s^2

315 17.7 cm/s^2

360 25 cm/s^2

&&&&

Can the x component of the position vector have the same sign as the x component of the velocity vector?

^^^^

yes

&&&&

Can the x component of the position vector have the same sign as the x component of the centripetal acceleration vector?

^^^^

yes

&&&&

Can the x component of the centripetal acceleration vector have the same sign as the x component of the velocity vector?

^^^^

yes

&&&&

Good results on this problem.

You had units errors on some earlier problems, and some on which I couldn't tell how you got the results.

class 091111

Class 091116

Short experiment (ball down short incline, up long

aluminum incline)

`q001.  Report your raw data for this experiment. 

Your data should include all direct observations required to determine the

duration of the interval you timed, and should also specify the events which

begin and end the interval.

****

&&&&

Experiment (rubber band accelerates loaded rotating

strap; determine unknown mass of magnets)

Attach two dominoes to the metal strap and arrange the a

paperclip so that its end protrudes beyond the end of the strap.  You will

use this protruding clip to accelerate the system using a consistent average

force, using with a rubber band chain.

Take three observations of the interval between the

release of the system by the rubber band and the system coming to rest. 

Observe the angular displacement and the time interval.

Repeat, this time with magnets added at the end of the

strap.

Repeat once more, this time with the magnets halfway

between the axis of rotation and the end of the strap.

`q002.  Report your raw data.

****

&&&&

Explain, in detail, the steps you took to assure that the

rubber band exerted the same average force through the same distance with each

trial.

****

&&&&

Indicate your estimate of the percent uncertainty in the

average force and the distance through which it was exerted.  Explain the

basis for your estimate.

`q003.  Using your raw data, find the angular

velocity for each system at the instant the rubber band lost contact with the

paperclip.  You may assume that the angular acceleration of the system was

uniform.

Note that, as is always the case when dealing with angular

dynamics, you will want to avoid messy conversion factors by expressing your

angles to be measured in radians.  You probably made your estimates in

degrees; you'll want to convert them to radians immediately, and use radians

throughout your analysis.

For the first system explain in detail how you got the

angular velocity at the specified instant.

****

The three systems will rotate through different angles in

different times.

For reference in subsequent calculations let's assume that

the first system rotated through 8 revolutions, coming to rest at the end,

requiring 12 seconds.  We use the standard reasoning for an object

accelerating to or from rest, given is displacement or angular displacement and

the time interval. 

&&&&

Give the specified angular velocities for each of the

other two systems.

****

&&&&

Which system had the greatest moment of inertia, and which

the least?

Which system had the greatest initial velocity (initial

velocity being measured at the instant the rubber band loses contact), and which

the least?

How are your answers to the first question related to your

answers to the second?

****

&&&&

`q004.  The 3-domino stack and the strap were

balanced on a ramp, resting on a single domino lying on its edge.  The

stack and the ramp each had an r vector running from the balancing point

to its center.  The length of the r vector for the dominoes was

about 25 cm. 

What do you estimate was the length of the r vector

for the strap?

****

The length of the r vector for the strap was

between 15 cm and 20 cm.  For simplicity of calculations here, we will use

20 cm.

&&&&

The strap and the dominoes exerted equal and opposite

torques on the system.  Explain how we know, with a relatively small

experimental error, that this was so.  Explain also the source of the

experimental error.

****

&&&&

The mass of each domino is about 20 grams so each has a

weight of about 0.20 N.  What therefore is the torque exerted about the

balancing point by the dominoes?  What is the direction of the torque

vector?

****

The magnitude of the torque would be r * F, where r = 25

cm and F = .60 N.  The torque is negative so

&&&&

What therefore is the torque exerted by the strap, and

what is the direction of this vector?

****

Ignoring the contribution of the ramp itself to the net

torque, then since net torque is zero we have

tau_strap + (-.15 m N) = 0 and

tau_strap = +.15 m N.

&&&&

According to your estimate of the moment arm of the strap,

what is its weight?  What therefore is its mass?

****

If the moment arm is 20 cm then

tau_strap = 20 cm * weight_strap and

weight_strap = .15 m N / 20 cm = .75 N.

The mass of the strap is therefore

m_strap * g = weight_strap so

m_strap = weight_strap / g = .75 N / (9.8 m/s^2) =

.077 kg, or about 77 grams.

&&&&

`q005.  The moment of inertia of the strap is about

I = 1/12 M L^2,

where M is its mass and L its length.

You know the mass and position of each domino.  What

therefore is the moment of inertia of the first system?

****

The moment of inertia of the strap is

The moment of inertia of each domino (about 20 grams at an

assumed distance of 14 cm from the axis) is

The total moment of inertia of strap plus two dominoes is

&&&&

Based on your calculation of the moment of inertia, what

was its kinetic energy at the beginning of the interval?  (You have

calculated angular velocity omega_0 for the beginning of the interval.  You

should know this but the KE of the system at angular velocity omega is 1/2 I

omega^2.)

****

At the previously calculated initial velocity of 8 rad/s

the KE would be

&&&&

In the following we will assume that the rubber band chain

did the same amount of work on each system.  Let KE_system stand for this

kinetic energy.  According to your calculations here, what is KE_system?

****

This would be the 0.4 Joule calculated for the first

system.

&&&&

Note that KE_system is now assumed to be equal to the KE

you calculated for this particular system.  We will assume that the other

two systems achieved the same kinetic energy, so the value of KE_system you

calculated here will now apply to the other two systems as well as the first.

`q006.  The second system consists of the first

system, plus two magnets.  The kinetic energy of this system is therefore

KE = I * omega_0^2, where omega_0 is now the initial velocity of the new system. 

Let m_mag stand for the mass of a magnet.

If you set I * omega_0^2 for the second system equal to

KE_system, you will have an equation that is easily solved for I.

Write down this equation and solve it for I.  

What is the symbolic expression for I, in terms of the above quantities, and

what is its numerical value (including units)?

... ambiguous ...

****

We did not assume any data for the second system. 

However let's assume that our data leads us to conclude that omega_0 = 6 rad / s

(recall that for the first system we had initial angular velocity 8 rad / s).

Setting 1/2 I omega_0^2 equal to the KE we get the

equation

I = sqrt( 2 * KE / omega_0^2) = sqrt( 2 * .04 J / (6

rad/s)^2 ) = .05 kg m^2.

&&&&

`q007.  Repeat the preceding for the third system.

****

The expression would be very similar but since the magnets

are twice as close to the center we get

&&&&

`q008.  According to your result for the second

system, how much moment of inertia was added by the two magnets at the ends of

the straps?

****

= .0032 kg m^2 + 2 * (m_mag * .14 m)^2

= .0032 kg m^2 + .04 m^2 * m_mag^2.

 

&&&&

What do you therefore conclude is the mass of each magnet?

`q009.  Repeat the preceding question using your

result for the third system.

****

&&&&

`q010.  For the first system, through what angle do

you estimate the rubber band exerted its force?  You will probably estimate

this angle in degrees, based on your recollection of the system, but be sure to

also express it in radians.

****

Typically the rubber band will exert its force through an

angle of about 1 radian.

&&&&

The work done by the rubber band is equal to the change in

KE between release (when the system was at rest) and the instant at which the

rubber band lost contact.  This work is equal to `dW = `dKE = tau_ave * `dTheta,

where `dTheta is the angle you just estimated.

Assuming that `dKE = KE_system, what therefore is the

average torque tau_ave exerted by the rubber band?

****

`dW = tau_ave * `dTheta so

tau_ave = `dW / `dTheta = .04 J / (1 rad) = .04 m N.

&&&&

What would be the average torque exerted by friction on

each system as it coasts to rest?

****

For the first system its initial angular velocity was 8

rad/s and it coasted to rest is 12 s.  Thus its angular acceleration was

This angular acceleration is due to the torque exerted by

friction, so by Newton's 2d Law tau_net = I * alpha we have

Each of the three systems will have a different moment of

inertia and a different angular acceleration.  This calculation would be

done for each of the three systems, using the values appropriate to each.

&&&&

For which system would you expect that the average

frictional torque would be greatest, and why?

****

&&&&

 

The figure below, which you have seen before, depicts the

radial, velocity and centripetal acceleration vectors depicted by arrows colored

blue, red and green, respectively.  This figure was understood to represent

an object moving around the circle at constant speed.

The system we have just observed was sped up by the rubber

band, then slowed by friction.  For this system the point on the circle

does not move with constant speed.  The system is accelerating, and the

point on the circle is accelerating in the direction of the velocity (while the

rubber band is in contact) and opposite to the direction of velocity (while the

system coasts to rest against friction).

Below, a second green arrow has been added to the figure,

depicting the acceleration of the point in the direction of the velocity. 

The velocity is tangent to the circle.  This

acceleration is therefore tangent to the circle, and we call it the tangential

acceleration.

The centripetal acceleration is opposite the direction of

the radial vector, so we call it the radial acceleration.

`q011.  Assume that the tangential acceleration is

constant. 

As the system speeds up, what happens to the magnitude

of each of the following:

****

The magnitude of the radial vector is the radius of

the circle, which remains the same as the angular velocity increases.

The angular velocity of the system increases, which

increases the velocity of the point so the magnitude of the velocity vector

increases.

The velocity of the point increases while the radius

of its path remains constant, so that a_cent = v^2 / r increases.

The tangential acceleration remains constant so the

magnitude of the tangential acceleration vector remains constant.

The magnitude of the tangential acceleration remains

constant while the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration increases. 

The two vectors are perpendicular, so the direction of the resultant is

closer to that of the centripetal acceleration with its greater magnitude. 

As the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration increases the direction of

the resultant becomes closer and closer to its direction.

&&&&

The figure below includes only the radial, velocity and

centripetal acceleration vectors.

 

In the next figure we have included a set of x-y axes

whose origin is at the center of the circle.

An smaller auxilary set of axes has been imposed on the

circle, at the end of the radial vector.  We will use this set of axes to

better visualize and determine the angles of the velocity and centripetal

acceleration vectors.

The radial vector is still depicted as before (head and

tail are still in their original positions).  However the line of that

vector has been extended, and will be used as a line of reference in calculating

the angles of the velocity and centripetal acceleration vectors.

We isolate the region of the figure defined by the

auxilary axes.  We eliminate the radial vector, but maintain the 'blue'

line.  It should be clear that this line makes the same angle with the

positive x direction as does the radial vector.

`q012.  Assume that the radial vector makes an angle

of 140 degrees with the positive x direction.  What then are the angles of

the velocity and centripetal acceleration vector with the positive x direction?

****

The velocity vector is at 140 deg + 90 deg = 230 deg, and

the centripetal acceleration vector is at 140 deg + 180 deg = 320 deg.

&&&&

`q013.  The figure below depicts the projection

vectors v_x and v_y.

Assuming the velocity vector to have magnitude 50 cm/s,

give your estimates of the magnitudes of the two projections.

****

v_y appears to be about 80% the magnitude of 

v and v_x appears to be about 60% the magnitude of  v

so

&&&&

Using the sine and the cosine, find the two projections.

****

At 230 deg we get approximate results

&&&&

`q013.  Using the above figures, make your own sketch

of the centripetal acceleration vector. 

Assuming a centripetal acceleration of magnitude 25

cm/s^2, estimate its x and y components.

****

&&&&

Using the sine and cosine, along with the angle of the

centripetal acceleration vector, calculate its x and y components.

****

The centripetal acceleration vector is at 320 deg so

we have

Your estimates should have been reasonably close to

these values.

&&&&

`q014.  Sketch the radial vector for the angle you

were given in class.  Sketch the corresponding centripetal acceleration and

velocity vectors.

Sketch your set of auxiliary axes, with the origin at the

end of the radial vector.

Make an enlarged sketch of the auxiliary axes, analogous to

that depicted here.  Include the line extending the radial vector, the

velocity vector and the centripetal acceleration vector.

Describe your sketch.

****

&&&&

Describe how you use your sketch to determine the angles

of the velocity and centripetal acceleration vectors.

****

&&&&

Assuming that the radial vector has magnitude 100 cm, the

velocity vector 50 cm/s and the centripetal acceleration vector 25 cm/s^2, find

the x components of all three.

****

&&&&

 

Earth's mass is about 6 * 10^24 kg.  The Moon's mass

is about 1/60 times the mass of the Earth.  The two are separated by about

300 000 km.  What is the gravitational force exerted on the Moon by the

Earth?  What therefore is the acceleration of the Moon toward the Earth? 

What is the acceleration of the Earth toward the Moon?  If the Moon were to

move 10 000 km closer to the Earth, what average force would act on it during

this interval?  How much work would gravity do on the Moon during this

interval?  By approximately how much would its gravitational PE change as a

result?  By how much would its PE relative to infinity change?  How

much energy would it take to get rid of the Moon altogether?  What is the

Moon's moment of inertia in its orbit around the Earth?  What are its

angular velocity and angular momentum?  KE?

What is your gravitational PE, relative to infinity, at

the surface of the Earth?  How much KE would you therefore need to make it

to infinity?  Over what minimum distance would you have to be accelerated

in order to survive?

Moment of Inertia of hoop, rod, sphere, disk

A hoop can be thought of as a thin wire bent into a

circular shape, rotating about an axis perpendicular to its plane and through

its center.  If it has mass M and radius R, then every mass in the hoop

lies at or very close to distance R from the axis, so every small mass m_i which

makes up the hoop lies at distance r_i = R.  Thus

and the moment of inertia for the hoop is just M R^2.

A uniform disk of mass M and radius R, rotating about an

axis perpendicular to its plane and through its center, has moment of inertia I

= 1/2 M R^2:

The mass of a sphere is concentrated even closer to an

axis through its center, since the sphere is 'thicker' near the axis.  Its

moment of inertia is I = 2/5 M R^2.

A rod rotating about an axis through its center has moment

of inertia 1/12 * M L^2. 

Rotating about an axis through one of its ends, the masses

are on the average twice as far from the axis, which makes the moment of inertia

four times as great.  So the moment of inertia of a rod rotating about one

of its ends is 4 * (1/12 M L^2) = 1/3 M L^2.

You are expected to know these formulas.

Homework:

Your label for this assignment: 

ic_class_091116

Copy and paste this label into the form.

Answer the questions posed above.

You have already seen most of the ideas in the qa's and

Introductory Problem Set mentioned below.  If you work through these

documents as assigned, you will get plenty of practice and should develop good

expertise with these concepts.

Do qa's #28 on orbital dynamics and 31 on torques and

their effect on motion.

Introductory Problem Set 8 consists of 18 problems on

circular motion and rotational dynamics.  You will be expected to work through these problems by the

first of next week. 

http://vhmthphy.vhcc.edu/ph1introsets/default.htm