#$&*
phy232
Your 'flow experiment' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** #$&* Your initial message (if any): **
** #$&* Is flow rate increasing, decreasing, etc.? **
The picture below shows a graduated cylinder containing water, with dark coloring (actually a soft drink). Water is flowing out of the cylinder through a short thin tube in the side of the cylinder. The dark stream is not obvious but it can be seen against the brick background.
You will use a similar graduated cylinder, which is included in your lab kit, in this experiment. If you do not yet have the kit, then you may substitute a soft-drink bottle. Click here for instructions for using the soft-drink bottle.
• In this experiment we will observe how the depth of water changes with clock time.
In the three pictures below the stream is shown at approximately equal time intervals. The stream is most easily found by looking for a series of droplets, with the sidewalk as background.
Based on your knowledge of physics, answer the following, and do your best to justify your answers with physical reasoning and insight:
• As water flows from the cylinder, would you expect the rate of flow to increase, decrease or remain the same as water flows from the cylinder?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The rate of flow will decrease as the water flows from the cylinder
#$&*
• As water flows out of the cylinder, an imaginary buoy floating on the water surface in the cylinder would descend.
○ Would you expect the velocity of the water surface and hence of the buoy to increase, decrease or remain the same?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The velocity of the water surface will decrease as time goes on.
#$&*
○ How would the velocity of the water surface, the velocity of the exiting water, the diameter of the cylinder and the diameter of the hole be interrelated? More specifically how could you determine the velocity of the water surface from the values of the other quantities?
Your answer (start in the next line):
You could determine the rate at which the water is flowing out of the hole (certain area) and then integrate that to get the amount of volume passing through the hole and then do it at another time and see how different they are.
Good insight. In this case the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the hole to the cross-sectional area of the container will give you the inverse of the ratio between speeds.
#$&*
• The water exiting the hole has been accelerated, since its exit velocity is clearly different than the velocity it had in the cylinder.
○ Explain how we know that a change in velocity implies the action of a force?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The change in velocity is due to the amount of gravitational potential energy in the system, when there is more water in the cylinder the more it pushes down on the water at the bottom because of gravity forcing the water at the bottom out of the hole at a faster rate.
#$&*
○ What do you think is the nature of the force that accelerates the water from inside the cylinder to the outside of the outflow hole?
Your answer (start in the next line):
Gravity is the nature of the force that accelerates the water from inside the cylinder to the outside of the outflow hole.
#$&*
From the pictures, answer the following and justify your answers, or explain in detail how you might answer the questions if the pictures were clearer:
• Does the depth seem to be changing at a regular rate, at a faster and faster rate, or at a slower and slower rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The depth of the water seems to be changing at a slower and slower rate.
#$&*
• What do you think a graph of depth vs. time would look like?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The depth vs. time graph would start out with a very negative slope at x=0 y=+# and as time went on the graph would start getting less and less steep until y=0 and x=+#.
#$&*
• Does the horizontal distance (the distance to the right, ignoring the up and down distance) traveled by the stream increase or decrease as time goes on?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The horizontal distance decreases as time goes on.
#$&*
• Does this distance change at an increasing, decreasing or steady rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
Decreasing rate.
#$&*
• What do you think a graph of this horizontal distance vs. time would look like? Describe in the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The graph would look like the depth vs. time graph where it would start out at a negative slope and flatten out by the time that the horizontal distance got to 0.
#$&*
You can easily perform this experiment in a few minutes using the graduated cylinder that came with your kit. If you don't yet have the lab materials, see the end of this document for instructions analternative setup using a soft-drink bottle instead of the graduated cylinder.
Setup of the experiment is easy. You will need to set it up near your computer, so you can use a timing program that runs on the computer. The cylinder will be set on the edge of a desk or tabletop, and you will need a container (e.g., a bucket or trash can) to catch the water that flows out of the cylinder. You might also want to use a couple of towels to prevent damage to furniture, because the cylinder will leak a little bit around the holes into which the tubes are inserted.
• Your kit included pieces of 1/4-inch and 1/8-inch tubing. The 1/8-inch tubing fits inside the 1/4-inch tubing, which in turn fits inside the two holes drilled into the sides of the graduated cylinder.
• Fit a short piece of 1/8-inch tubing inside a short piece of 1/4-inch tubing, and insert this combination into the lower of the two holes in the cylinder. If the only pieces of 1/4-inch tubing you have available are sealed, you can cut off a short section of the unsealed part and use it; however don't cut off more than about half of the unsealed part--be sure the sealed piece that remains has enough unsealed length left to insert and securely 'cap off' a piece of 1/4-inch tubing.
• Your kit also includes two pieces of 1/8-inch tubing inside pieces of 1/4-inch tubing, with one end of the 1/8-inch tubing sealed. Place one of these pieces inside the upper hole in the side of the cylinder, to seal it.
• While holding a finger against the lower tube to prevent water from flowing out, fill the cylinder to the top mark (this will be the 250 milliliter mark).
• Remove your thumb from the tube at the same instant you click the mouse to trigger the TIMER program.
• The cylinder is marked at small intervals of 2 milliliters, and also at larger intervals of 20 milliliters. Each time the water surface in the cylinder passes one of the 'large-interval' marks, click the TIMER.
• When the water surface reaches the level of the outflow hole, water will start dripping rather than flowing continuously through the tube. The first time the water drips, click the TIMER. This will be your final clock time.
• We will use 'clock time' to refer to the time since the first click, when you released your thumb from the tube and allowed the water to begin flowing.
• The clock time at which you removed your thumb will therefore be t = 0.
Run the experiment, and copy and paste the contents of the TIMER program below:
Your answer (start in the next line):
1 2014.07 2014.07
2 2018.836 4.765625
3 2023.363 4.527344
4 2028.766 5.402344
#$&*
Measure the large marks on the side of the cylinder, relative to the height of the outflow tube. Put the vertical distance from the center of the outflow tube to each large mark in the box below, from smallest to largest distance. Put one distance on each line.
Your answer (start in the next line):
1/4
1-1/4
2-1/4
3-1/4
#$&*
Now make a table of the position of the water surface vs. clock time. The water surface positions will be the positions of the large marks on the cylinder relative to the outflow position (i.e., the distances you measured in the preceding question) and the clock times will as specified above (the clock time at the first position will be 0). Enter 1 line for each event, and put clock time first, position second, with a comma between.
For example, if the first mark is 25.4 cm above the outflow position and the second is 22.1 cm above that position, and water reached the second mark 2.45 seconds after release, then the first two lines of your data table will be
0, 25.4
2.45, 22.1
If it took another 3.05 seconds to reach the third mark at 19.0 cm then the third line of your data table would be
5.50, 19.0
Note that it would NOT be 3.05, 19.0. 3.05 seconds is a time interval, not a clock time. Again, be sure that you understand that clock times represent the times that would show on a running clock.
The second column of your TIMER output gives clock times (though that clock probably doesn't read zero on your first click), the third column gives time intervals. The clock times requested here are those for a clock which starts at 0 at the instant the water begins to flow; this requires an easy and obvious modification of your TIMER's clock times.
For example if your TIMER reported clock times of 223, 225.45, 228.50 these would be converted to 0, 2.45 and 5.50 (just subtract the initial 223 from each), and these would be the times on a clock which reads 0 at the instant of the first event.
Do not make the common error of reporting the time intervals (third column of the TIMER output) as clock times. Time intervals are the intervals between clicks; these are not clock times.
Your answer (start in the next line):
0, 3-1/4
4.765, 2-1/4
9.285, 1-1/4
14.68, 1/4
#$&*
You data could be put into the following format:
clock time (in seconds, measured from first reading) Depth of water (in centimeters, measured from the hole)
0 14
10 10
20 7
etc. etc.
Your numbers will of course differ from those on the table.
The following questions were posed above. Do your data support or contradict the answers you gave above?
• Is the depth changing at a regular rate, at a faster and faster rate, or at a slower and slower rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
Depth over the full experiment is changing at a slower and slower rate, my data kind of supports this idea but my data is not the best because I didn’t have the data so I had to use a solo cup which is tapered on the sides and my ability to click the data points and watch the cup was off. So this results in data that might be skewed.
A tapered cup is actually very interesting, a little challenging to model but not beyond the scope of this course.
#$&*
• Sketch a graph of depth vs. clock time (remember that the convention is y vs. x; the quantity in front of the 'vs.' goes on the vertical axis, the quantity after the 'vs.' on the horizontal axis). You may if you wish print out and use the grid below.
Describe your graph in the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The slope should be decreasing at the beginning and then flatten out as time goes on which is kind of what my data does but I couldn’t get enough data points to make the graph look like that.
#$&*
caution: Be sure you didn't make the common mistake of putting time intervals into the first column; you should put in clock times. If you made that error you still have time to correct it. If you aren't sure you are welcome to submit your work to this point in order to verify that you really have clock times and not time intervals
Now analyze the motion of the water surface:
• For each time interval, find the average velocity of the water surface.
Explain how you obtained your average velocities, and list them:
Your answer (start in the next line):
Slope 1=.209
Slope 2=.221
Slope 3=.185
I obtained the average velocities by dividing 1/ the time it took to go one inch. So rise over run.
#$&*
• Assume that this average velocity occurs at the midpoint of the corresponding time interval.
What are the clock times at the midpoints of your time intervals, and how did you obtain them? (Give one midpoint for each time interval; note that it is midpoint clock time that is being requested, not just half of the time interval. The midpoint clock time is what the clock would read halfway through the interval. Again be sure you haven't confused clock times with time intervals. Do not make the common mistake of reporting half of the time interval, i.e., half the number in the third column of the TIMER's output):
Your answer (start in the next line):
#$&*
• Make a table of average velocity vs. clock time. The clock time on your table should be the midpoint clock time calculated above.
Give your table below, giving one average velocity and one clock time in each line. You will have a line for each time interval, with clock time first, followed by a comma, then the average velocity.
Your answer (start in the next line):
4.765, .209
9.285, .221
14.68, .185
#$&*
• Sketch a graph of average velocity vs. clock time. Describe your graph, using the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
My graph has a positive slope to start with then goes negative, but my graph is wrong because of the reasons listed earlier with the solo cup. It should decrease at a negative rate and then start to flatten out as it goes until the end.
#$&*
• For each time interval of your average velocity vs. clock time table determine the average acceleration of the water surface. Explain how you obtained your acceleration values.
Your answer (start in the next line):
Time interval 1=-.0438
Time interval 2=-.0488
Time interval 3=-.0342
Divided the y from the last table by the time to get the slope of the graph during those intervals.
#$&*
• Make a table of average acceleration vs. clock time, using the clock time at the midpoint of each time interval with the corresponding acceleration.
Give your table in the box below, giving on each line a midpoint clock time followed by a comma followed by acceleration.
Your answer (start in the next line):
It goes up and then back down over the time, but it should go down and then down again just over a slower rate.
#$&*
Answer two questions below:
• Do your data indicate that the acceleration of the water surface is constant, increasing or decreasing, or are your results inconclusive on this question?
• Do you think the acceleration of the water surface is actually constant, increasing or decreasing?
Your answer (start in the next line):
Decreasing is what I believe it is but my data says otherwise because the experiment was not performed well. And the acceleration is decreasing.
#$&*
Go back to your graph of average velocity vs. midpoint clock time. Fit the best straight line you can to your data.
• What is the slope of your straight line, and what does this slope represent? Give the slope in the first line, your interpretation of the slope in the second.
• How well do you think your straight line represents the actual behavior of the system? Answer this question and explain your answer.
• Is your average velocity vs. midpoint clock time graph more consistent with constant, increasing or decreasing acceleration? Answer this question and explain your answer.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The slope is negative and it represents how the slope of the system decreases as time goes on. This line does not represent the actual behavior of the system because as I said earlier the data doesn’t represent what is really going on here because I messed up the experiment. It is decreasing acceleration because the gravitational potential energy decreases in the system as time goes on.
#$&*
Your instructor is trying to gauge the typical time spent by students on these experiments. Please answer the following question as accurately as you can, understanding that your answer will be used only for the stated purpose and has no bearing on your grades:
• Approximately how long did it take you to complete this experiment?
Your answer (start in the next line):
An hour and a half because I didn’t have the supplies.
#$&*
You may add any further comments, questions, etc. below:
Your answer (start in the next line):
#$&*
Pasted from
Good. The discussion at the link assumes that the container has a uniform cross-sectional area. It's interesting to think about how the results for a tapered cup (which is a section of a cone) might differ. No revision is necessary, but you're welcome to ask additional questions.
&#Please see the following link for more extensive commentary on this lab. You should read over all the commentary and note anything relevant. Give special attention to any comments relevant to notes inserted into your posted work. If significant errors have occurred in your work, then subsequent results might be affected by those errors, and if so they should be corrected.
Expanded Commentary
Please respond by submitting a copy of this document by inserting revisions and/or self-critiques and/or questions as appropriate. Mark you insertions with #### and use the Submit Work Form. If a title has been suggested for the revision, use that title; otherwise use an appropriate title that will allow you to easily locate the posted response at your Access Page. &#