course mth 163
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
22:51:32 `q001. Note that this assignment has 5 questions If a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n, with a(0) = 3, then substitute in turn the values 1, 2, 3 and 4 into the equation to obtain the values a(1), a(2), a(3) and a(4).
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> a(1)= a(1+1) + 2^1 = 2a + 2 a(2) = a(2+1) + 2^2 = 3a + 4 a(3) = a(3+1) + 2^3 = 4a + 8 a(4) = a(4+1) + 2^4 = 5a + 16
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
22:56:55 04-04-2006 22:56:55 If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(1) = a(1-1) + 2^1 or, since 1-1 = 0 and 2^1 = 2 a(1) = a(0) + 2. Since we are given a(0) = 3 we now have a(1) = 3 + 2 = 5. If we substitute n = 2 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(2) = a(2-1) + 2^2 or, since 2-1 = 1 and 2^2 = 4 a(2) = a(1) + 4. Since we are given a(1) = 5 we now have a(2) = 5 + 4 = 9. If we substitute n = 3 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(3) = a(3-1) + 2^3 or, since 3-1 = 2 and 2^3 = 8 a(3) = a(2) + 8. Since we are given a(2) = 9 we now have a(3) = 9 + 8 = 17. If we substitute n = 4 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(4) = a(4-1) + 2^4 or, since 4-1 = 3 and 2^4 = 16 a(4) = a(3) + 16. Since we are given a(3) = 16 we now have a(4) = 17 + 16 = 33.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
NOTES -------> My first thought is that I need to copy the problem down correctly. That would be the first step in completing the problem with the correct answers. My second thought is that I wasn't sure of how this problem worked and my thoughts were correct...I didn't... I wasn't sure of how the a(0) = 3 fit into the equation. But by looking at the answer, I see what was meant by a(0) = 3. I redid all the problems with this new knowledge and with the correct problem (writing it correctly) and have come to the same conclusion that you have arrived.
.......................................................!!!!!!!!........................... ........
22:56:59 If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(1) = a(1-1) + 2^1 or, since 1-1 = 0 and 2^1 = 2 a(1) = a(0) + 2. Since we are given a(0) = 3 we now have a(1) = 3 + 2 = 5. If we substitute n = 2 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(2) = a(2-1) + 2^2 or, since 2-1 = 1 and 2^2 = 4 a(2) = a(1) + 4. Since we are given a(1) = 5 we now have a(2) = 5 + 4 = 9. If we substitute n = 3 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(3) = a(3-1) + 2^3 or, since 3-1 = 2 and 2^3 = 8 a(3) = a(2) + 8. Since we are given a(2) = 9 we now have a(3) = 9 + 8 = 17. If we substitute n = 4 into a(n) = a(n-1) + 2^n we get a(4) = a(4-1) + 2^4 or, since 4-1 = 3 and 2^4 = 16 a(4) = a(3) + 16. Since we are given a(3) = 16 we now have a(4) = 17 + 16 = 33.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE -->
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:04:17 `q002. If a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) + n with a(0) = 3, then what are the values of a(1), a(2), a(3) and a(4)?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) = n with a(0) = 3 a(1) = 2 * a(1-1) + 1 = 2 * a(0) +1 =2 * 3 + 1 = 7 a(2) = 2 * a(2-1) +2 = 2* a(1) + 2 +2 * 7 + 12 = 16 a(3) = 2 * a(3-1) + 3 = 2 * a(2) + 3 + 2 * 16 + 3 = 35 a(4) = 2 * a(4-1) + 4 = 2* a(3) + 4 = 2 * 35 + 4 = 74
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:05:21 If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) + n we get a(1) = 2 * a(1-1) + 1 or since 1-1 = 0 a(1) = 2 * a(0) + 1. Since we know that a(0) = 3 we have a(1) = 2 * 3 + 1 = 7. If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) + n we get a(2) = 2 * a(2-1) + 2 or since 2-1 = 1 a(2) = 2 * a(1) + 2. Since we know that a(0) = 3 we have a(2) = 2 * 7 + 2 = 16. If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) + n we get a(3) = 2 * a(3-1) + 3 or since 3-1 = 2 a(3) = 2 * a(2) + 3. Since we know that a(0) = 3 we have a(3) = 2 * 16 + 3 = 35. If we substitute n = 1 into a(n) = 2 * a(n-1) + n we get a(4) = 2 * a(4-1) + 4 or since 4-1 = 3 a(4) = 2 * a(3) + 4. Since we know that a(0) = 3 we have a(4) = 2 * 35 + 4 = 74.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Once I saw how it worked ( on the first problem) I have no problems in figuring it out.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:12:16 `q003. What are the average slopes of the graph of y = x^2 + x - 2 between the x = 1 and x= 3 points, between the x = 3 and x = 5 points, between the x = 5 and x = 7 points, and between the x = 7 and x = 9 points? What is the pattern of this sequence of slopes?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The pattern of this swquence of slopes is an increase of 4 with each set of x values starting with 5 , 9, 13 ,17
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:14:23 At x = 1, 3, 5 , 7 and 9 we find by substituting that y = 0, 10, 28, 54 and 88. The x = 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 points are therefore (1,0), (3,10), (5,28), (7,54) and (9,88). The run from one point to the next is always 2. The rises are respectively 10, 18, 26 and 34. The slopes are therefore slope between x = 1 and x = 3: slope = rise / run = 10 / 2 = 6. slope between x = 3 and x = 5: slope = rise / run = 18 / 2 = 9. slope between x = 5 and x = 7: slope = rise / run = 26 / 2 = 13. slope between x = 7 and x = 9: slope = rise / run = 34 / 2 = 17.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I re-checked my figures to find the mistake on the first slope with the x values being x = 1 and x = 3 and I see that the slope should be 5. If I am incorrect please correct me, but my answer differs from the one listed.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:18:23 `q004. If a solid stone sphere 4 inches in diameter weighs 3 pounds, then what would be the weight of a solid stone sphere 2 feet in diameter?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> Could it be 18 lbs?
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:26:04 The volume of a sphere is proportional to the cube of its diameters, and weight is directly proportional to volume so we have the proportionality w = k d^3, where w and d stand for weight and diameter and k is the proportionality constant. Substituting the known weight and diameter we get 3 = k * 4^3, where we understand that the weight is in pounds and the diameter in inches. This gives us 3 = 64 k so that k = 3 / 64. Our proportionality equation is now w = 3/64 * d^3. So when the diameter is 2 feet, we first recall that diameter must be in inches and say that d = 24, which we then substitute to obtain w = 3/64 * 24^3. A simple calculation gives us the final weight w = 748.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I didn't think about weight and volume being the same. This goes back to assignment 12 where we found out that volume is proportional to the cube of the diameter. 3 = 4^3 * k 3 = 64k = k = 3/64 so when the diameter is 2 feet or 24 inches w = 24^3 * 3/64 = 648 My answer differs from yours by 100 lbs...I rechecked my multiplication but come up with the same answer again...would you please let me know where I am making my mistake?
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:34:46 `q005. Two boxes are each constructed of a single layer of cardboard. The first box is 12 inches by 18 inches by 24 inches and weighs 22 ounces; the second is 36 inches by 54 inches by 72 inches. Using proportionality determine the weight of the second box.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but here goes... a = kx^2 5184 = 22^2 k k = 10.71 v = k A^3/2 v = 10.71 (139968)^3/2 v = 375.45 oz
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
23:37:28 The ratios 36/12, 54/18 and 72/24 of the corresponding sides are all the same and all equal to 3, so the dimensions of the sides of the second box are 3 times those of the first. Since the thickness of the cardboard is the same on both boxes, only the dimensions of the rectangular sides change. The only thing that matters, therefore, is the surface area of the box. The proportionality is therefore of the form w = k x^2, where w is the weight of the box and x stands any linear dimension. It follows that w2 / w1 = (x2 / x1)^2. Since as we just saw x2 / x1 = 3, we see that w2 / w1 = 3^2 = 9. Since w1 = 22 oz, we write this as w2 / 22 oz = 9. Multiplying both sides by 22 oz we see that w2 = 22 oz * 9 = 198 oz.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> guess I blew that one out of the water...it never occured to me to check to see that the second box was 3 times larger than the first.
.................................................
"