rubber band calibration

Phy 201

Your 'rubber band calibration' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** #$&* Your initial comment (if any): **

** #$&* first line ruler markings, distance in actual cm between ends, how obtained: **

10, 20.3

10.3

I held the single reduced ruler up while the rubber band chain hung next to it. I think its accurate within .05.

** #$&* The basis for your uncertainty estimate: **

The single reduced ruler is fairly accurate to see the millimeter markings so I can easily tell to within .05 cm

** #$&* Positions of the ends of each rubber band, actual lengths of each when the chain supports 1 domino: **

10, 20.3

10, 22.3

10, 20.6

10, 22.3

10, 20.45

10, 21.8

end

10.3, 12.3, 10.6, 12.3, 10.45, 11.8

uncertainty is still .05

** #$&* Distances between ends when supporting 2 dominoes **

10.7, 12.3, 11.0, 12.4, 11.0, 12.0

2 dominoes were added for these measurements

** #$&* Lengths when supporting 4, 6, ... dominoes: **

12.1, 12.8, 12.4, 12.7, 12.0, 12.4

4

14.1, 13.1, 14.8, 13.1, 13.9, 12.8

6

end

** #$&* Your table of force in Newtons vs. length in cm for all rubber bands **

10.3, 12.3, 10.6, 12.3, 10.45, 11.8, .19

10.7, 12.3, 11.0, 12.4, 11.0, 12.0, .38

12.1, 12.8, 12.4, 12.7, 12.0, 12.4, .76

14.1, 13.1, 14.8, 13.1, 13.9, 12.8, 1.14

end

each column represents how each of the six rubber bands change in lengths with the addition of dominoes.

** #$&* Describe the graph of your first rubber band **

As the newtons increased, so did the lengths of the rubber bands. Increasing at an increasing rate. the shapes of the curves are pretty consistent with each other.

end

** #$&* The tension force in your first rubber band at length 9.8 cm: **

.18N

** #$&* The length of your first rubber band when tension is 1.4 N: **

11.2

** #$&* The forces at your observed lengths the 1st rubber band, as given by the curve, and the deviations of those curve-predicted lengths from the observed lengths: **

.19, .38, .76, 1.14

It appears to differ by the amount of weight by 2x, 4x, and 6x respectivley

** #$&* The lengths predicted for forces .19 N, .38 N, .76 N, 1.14 N, etc. by the curve for your first rubber band; the deviations of your actual observations from these predictions: **

10.3, 10.7, 12.1, 14.1

the differences were consistent with the measurements

** #$&* The typical error you estimate when predicting force for a given length from your graphs: **

tables because they are precise and the curve is estimated.

.5 N because the graph i made went in steps of .5

** #$&* The typical error you estimate when predicting length for a given force from your graphs: **

.05cm because I can easily tell measurements on the ruler up to there

** **

5 hours

** **

&#This looks very good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#