#$&* course Mth 158 If your solution to stated problem does not match the given solution, you should self-critique per instructions at http://vhcc2.vhcc.edu/dsmith/geninfo/labrynth_created_fall_05/levl1_22/levl2_81/file3_259.htm.
.............................................
Given Solution: * * ** ERRONEOUS STUDENT SOLUTION: To make this problem into a single polynomial, you can group like terms together. (8-6)+ (4x^3-4x^3) + (-3x^2) + (8x) + (-1+2). Then solve from what you just grouped...2 (-3x^2+8x+1). INSTRUCTOR CORRECTION: 8 is multiplied by the first polynomial and 6 by the second. You need to follow the order of operations. Starting with 8 ( 4 x^3 - 3 x^2 - 1 ) - 6 ( 4 x^3 + 8 x - 2 ) use the Distributive Law to get 32 x^3 - 24 x^2 - 8 - 24 x^3 - 48 x + 12. Then add like terms to get 8x^3 - 24x^2 - 48x + 4 ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 3 OK ********************************************* Question: * R.4.60 (was R.5.54). What is the product (-2x - 3) ( 3 - x)? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Make a problem for each in the parentheses: (-2x minus 3) ( 3 minus x) -2x ( 3 - x) - 3 ( 3 - x) -2x(3) - 2x(-x) - 3 * 3 - 3 ( -x) multiply and simiplify to get -2 times 3 =-6x....then -2x*-1x=2x^2 - 9-3(-x)= 3x -6x + 2 x^2 - 9 + 3x. DO LIKE TERMS 2 x^2 - 3 x - 9. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: * * ** Many students like to use FOIL but it's much better to use the Distributive Law, which will later be applied to longer and more complicated expressions where FOIL does not help a bit. Starting with (-2x - 3) ( 3 - x) apply the Distributive Law to get -2x ( 3 - x) - 3 ( 3 - x). Then apply the Distributive Law again to get -2x(3) - 2x(-x) - 3 * 3 - 3 ( -x) and simiplify to get -6x + 2 x^2 - 9 + 3x. Add like terms to get 2 x^2 - 3 x - 9. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 3 OK ********************************************* Question: * R.4.66 (was R.5.60). What is the product (x - 1) ( x + 1) and how did you obtain your result using a special product formula? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: We can do foil in this one: x(X-1)+1(x-1) then multiply so we get x^2 minus x plus x minus 1..mark out the comon x then we have just the x^2 minus 1 confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: Starting with (x-1)(x+1) use the Distributive Law once to get x ( x + 1) - 1 ( x+1) then use the Distributive Law again to get x*x + x * 1 - 1 * x - 1 * 1. Simplify to get x^2 +- x - x + - 1. Add like terms to get x^2 - 1. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 3 OK ********************************************* Question: * R.4.84 (was R.5.78). What is (2x + 3y)^2 and how did you obtain your result using a special product formula? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Alright since there is an exponent of two we do the same problem twice but we must reaarrange and combine to sepeartare problems: (2X+3Y)(2x+3y) 2X(2x+3y) +3Y(2x+3y) then multiply so we have for the first 4x^2 plus 6xy PLUS for the second 6xy+9y^2 and we have like tems so andd the 6xy plus 6xy and then drag it all down and we get 4x^2 plus 12xy plus 9y^2 confidence rating #$&*: 3 OK ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: * * ** The Special Product is (a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2 a b + b^2. Letting a = 2x and b = 3y we substitute into the right-hand side a^2 + 2 a b + b^2 to get (2x)^2 + 2 * (2x) * (3y) + (3y)^2, which we expand to get 4 x^2 + 12 x y + 9 y^2. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: * R.4.105 \ 90 (was R.5.102). Explain why the degree of the product of two polynomials equals the sum of their degrees. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Because either way they can be the same like (a+b)(c+d) is ac+ad+bc+bd because the laws. Multiply the highest in the first by the highest in the second, always the higest gives you the some of the powers, the highest powe will be in the anser of the sum of the degreres of two polynomials. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: * * ** STUDENT ANSWER AND INSTRUCTOR COMMENTS: The degree of the product of two polynomials equals the sum of their degrees because you use the law of exponenents and the ditributive property. INSTRUCOTR COMMENTS: Not bad. A more detailed explanation: The Distributive Law ensures that you will be multiplying the highest-power term in the first polynomial by the highest-power term in the second. Since the degree of each polynomial is the highest power present, and since the product of two powers gives you an exponent equal to the sum of those powers, the highest power in the product will be the sum of the degrees of the two polynomials. Since the highest power present in the product is the degree of the product, the degree of the product is the sum of the degrees of the polynomials. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 2 OK * Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment. I am not good at critically connecting/explaining the dots of the reasoning behind algebra" Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique rating: * Add comments on any surprises or insights you experienced as a result of this assignment. I am not good at critically connecting/explaining the dots of the reasoning behind algebra"