timer program

#$&*

Phy 201

Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** TIMER program_labelMessages **

6/6 11

** **

1 hour

** **

DO NOT COPY THE LINES ABOVE THIS ONE. JUST FILL THOSE LINES IN WHEN YOU SUBMIT

YOUR RESULTS AT THE END OF THIS FORM.

Follow the instructions, fill in your data and the results of your analysis in

the given format.

Regularly save your document to your computer as you work.

When you have completed your work:

Highlight the contents of the text editor, and copy and paste those contents

into the indicated box at the end of this form.

Click the Submit button and save your form confirmation.

This experiment is self-explanatory. Student report time of completion ranging

from 10 minutes to 1 hour, with 30 minutes being the most typical.

Downloading and/or running the TIMER program

If you have a Macintosh computer the preferred timer.exe program might not work

(it will if your computer has a Windows emulator), but the alternative Java

applet should work just fine.

timer.exe

The program timer.exe should be downloaded to your hard drive and/or flash drive

so you have access to it whenever you need it.

There is an alternative Java applet (see the heading timer java applet below) ,

but the .exe option is preferable. It is worth 15 minutes of effort to get the

program working on your hard drive, after which you will have it and won't need

Internet access to run it. It will start up instantly, it runs in a small

window, and it has the ability to file your data. However if you can't get it

working in 15 minutes with the instructions given below, just move on the the

Java version.

To use the Windows version:

If you are using a Windows PC, or a Mac with Windows emulator, first take a few

seconds to run the program q a prelim. As soon as the form opens on your

screen, you can close it. Nothing needs to be submitted. The first thing this

program does is to create the c:\vhmthphy folder on your hard drive. As an

alternative you can also create a c:\vhmthphy folder.

The timer.exe program opens in a small window and can be run side-by-side with

other windows applications on your computer (just size the second window so it

leaves room for the Timer program).

Run the program now. If it fails to work then try the following, in order:

If you got the Run-time Error 76, it can be corrected by the step given earlier.

That instruction is repeated below:

Run the program q a prelim. As soon as the form opens on your screen, you can

close it. Nothing needs to be submitted. The first thing this program does is

to create the c:\vhmthphy folder on your hard drive. As an alternative you can

manually create this folder.

If this doesn't work, follow the link COMDLG32 to access simple instructions for

fixing the problem. Then run timer.exe .

To use the Java version:

Windows users:

The Java applet does require that the Java Runtime Environment be installed.

Almost every Apple computer, and most Windows computers, will have this

environment installed. If your computer will not run the Java applet, the

installation is simple and quick. If you search under 'Java Runtime

Environment', using any search engine, you will find information on the Java

Runtime Environment and on the installation. You should satisfy yourself that

you are downloading from a verifiable, trusted source.

Mac users:

Apple supplies their own version of Java. Use the Software Update feature

(available on the Apple menu) to check that you have the most up-to-date version

of Java for your Mac.

should check the Apple site for the Software Update feature (available on the

Apple menu) to check that you have the most up-to-date version of Java for your

Mac.

The Java Applet at the link Timer-Java will work fine for the current

experiment, and will do just about everything the timer.exe program will do.

The Java applet has a few more or less minor inconveniences and one that's not

quite as minor:

You can't put the Java applet on your hard drive or flash drive, so you have to

pull it off the Web every time you want to use it.

The applet won't file your data. However it will let you copy and paste your

data into a text editor.

If your machine doesn't run Java applets, you would have to set it up to do so

(just search the web under 'Java Runtime Environment', which is free and

installs easily). This software is pretty standard, and is already installed on

most machines.

Operating the TIMER program

It is easy to operate the Timer program. All you have to do is click on the

button labeled Click to Time Event.

Click that button about 10 times and describe what you see.

I see columns with different numbers appear with each click.

#$&*

Now click on Initialize Counter, which will clear all the data from the timer

window. Click the mouse as fast as you can until the TIMER window fills up. Be

sure you get at least 20 time intervals.

If you miss a click, try again. Keep trying until you get at least 20 intervals

without a missed or delayed click.

Copy your data starting in the next line:

1 27.827 27.827

2 27.984 0.157

3 28.155 0.171

4 28.333 0.178

5 28.488 0.155

6 28.643 0.155

7 28.811 0.168

8 28.98 0.169

9 29.161 0.181

10 29.33 0.169

11 29.512 0.182

12 29.681 0.169

13 29.846 0.165

14 30.001 0.155

15 30.157 0.156

16 30.331 0.174

17 30.483 0.152

18 30.635 0.152

19 30.808 0.173

20 30.968 0.16

#$&*

You got at least 20 time intervals. Based on your data what was the average of

the first 20 time intervals? Note that you could get this average by averaging

the first 20 intervals. My first few intervals were .15625, .15625, .1875,

.171875, etc; I could just add up the first 20 intervals and divide by 20 to get

the average. However there is an easier and quicker way to get the result, so

use the easier way if you can. NOTE: Spreadsheet calculations and other

methods that disguise the process of finding the average are not valid answers

to this question. Spreadsheets are perfectly legal for most data analysis, but

not in this experiment.

Give your result, number only, in the first line, and starting in the second

line explain how you got it.

0.165

I subtracted the timestamp from interval 21 from interval 1 and divided that by

20.

#$&*

When I did this activity the first few lines of my data were as follows:

event number clock time time interval

1 11.67188 11.67188

2 11.875 0.203125

3 12.0625 0.1875

4 12.20313 0.140625

5 12.375 0.171875

6 12.54688 0.171875

7 12.73438 0.1875

8 12.92188 0.1875

9 13.10938 0.1875

10 13.28125 0.171875

11 13.4375 0.15625

It looks like the same intervals keep popping up. For example .1875 seconds

occurs 5 times out of the first 10 intervals, .171875 seconds occurs three

times, and .203125 seconds, .140625 seconds and .15625 seconds each occur once.

A frequency distribution for my time intervals would be as follows:

time interval frequency

,140625 1

.15625 1

.171875 3

.1875 5

.203125 1

What different time intervals did you observe in your first 20 intervals, and

how many times did each occur? List below the different time intervals you

observed and the number of times each occurred. List from the shortest to the

longest interval, and use a comma between the time interval and its frequency.

For example my data above would be listed at

.140625, 1

.1565, 1

.171875, 3

.1875, 5

.203125, 1

Your list should be in exactly this format, with no other symbols or characters.

0.152, 2

0.155, 3

0.156, 1

0.157, 1

0.16, 1

0.165, 1

0.168, 1

0.169, 3

0.171, 1

0.173, 1

0.174, 1

0.178, 1

0.181, 1

0.182, 1

#$&*

You may make any comments or ask any question about the process so far in the

box below

#$&*

On the 10 intervals I've shown you, do you really think I managed to get a time

of .1875 seconds, accurate to 4 significant figures, on half of the intervals?

If you do, I'm grateful for your confidence but I'm just not that good. No

human being has that much neurological and muscular control.

So why do you think the TIMER program reported that time so frequently? Why

weren't there times like .1830 seconds, or .1769 seconds? Does this mean that

the TIMER program is flawed? Does that mean it's useless?

It shows that the Timer program is not super accurate, and it rounds to certain

numbers such as 0.1875 and then jumps up to the next rounded number to account

for all the numbers in between.

#$&*

Here are a few more lines of data, with an added column showing the difference

between each time interval and the next.

clock time time interval difference from one time interval to next

9 13.10938 0.1875 -0.01563

10 13.28125 0.171875 -0.01563

11 13.4375 0.15625 0.03125

12 13.625 0.1875 -0.01563

13 13.79688 0.171875 0.015625

14 13.98438 0.1875 0.015625

15 14.1875 0.203125 -0.03125

16 14.35938 0.171875 -0.01563

17 14.51563 0.15625 0.03125

Take a good look at that last column and tell us what you see in those numbers,

and what this tells you about the TIMER program

This shows that there is not much variation in between each time interval,

indicating that the Timer program only rounds to the nearest hundreth of a

second. (However, mine rounded to the nearest thousandth of a second!)

#$&*

Now initialize the TIMER once more, and take a series of 10 relaxed breaths.

Every time you start to inhale, hit the TIMER button.

My results for the first 7 complete breaths are as follows:

series of relaxed breaths

event number clock time time interval difference between time

interval and next

1 1569.734 1569.734

2 1582.75 13.01563 0.32812

3 1596.094 13.34375 3.90625

4 1613.344 17.25 2.70313

5 1633.297 19.95313 1.35937

6 1654.609 21.3125 4.23438

7 1680.156 25.54688 2.15625

8 1707.859 27.70313

I didn't go on because the time between my breaths kept increasing, and I was

afraid if I relaxed any more I might stop breathing altogether. It's going to

take either more statistical analysis to determine whether that's a real danger,

or a little common sense.

Report your results by just entering your time intervals, one to each line, in

the box below. If I was entering my results I would enter

13.01563

13.34375

17.25

19.95313

21.3125

etc.

Enter your results in the same format:

2.597

2.923

3.232

2.842

3.077

2.882

3.234

2.86

3.034

2.983

#$&*

If you have any comments please insert them here

#$&*

Most likely you did not observe the same exact time interval twice, and if you

did it did not happen nearly as often as when you did the fact clicks.

Why do you think this is exactly what we would expect?

Because the time between each breath is more unpredictable than simply pushing a

button as fast as possible.

#$&*

Which of the following statements do you think is the most accurate?

a. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events

accurately to within about .1 second.

b. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events

accurately to within about .01 second.

c. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events

accurately to within about .001 second.

d. The TIMER program is capable of determining the time between two events

accurately to within about .0001 second.

Enter your answer and your reasoning below:

C. It seems that my Timer program is capable of determining a time interval to

within 0.001 second.

#$&*

Note that the TIMER.exe program can save your data in a format that can be read

by a spreadsheet (the TIMER applet cannot do so). This will be very handy in

the future, so take a minute and do the following:

1. Click on the button at the lower right of the TIMER form, entitled Click to

File Data.

2. A box will pop up allowing you to include an identifying message. You should

generally choose to include such a message; for the data presently on your timer

that might be 'series of regular breaths time at beginning of inhalation' or

something similar. Type in whatever you think would serve as a good identifier

for this data and OK that box.

3. A typical Save As window will appear. Decide where to save your data and

what to call it, and proceed to save it. The program will save the file as a

comma-delimited text file.

4. Open your spreadsheet program (typically Excel) and choose File > Open.

Browse to the folder in which you just saved your data. Below the File Name

line will be a File Type line; set this either to Text Files or All Files so

your file will appear. Open it.

5. A series of windows will typically appear. In the first window make sure

the file type chosen is Delimited, the proceed to the next window.

6. In the second window you will see a series of checkboxes; check the one

entitled Comma, in order to select the comma-delimited file, then just click on

Finish.

If you can't run the .exe program, you can't do Steps 1-3. However all you need

to do is copy the contents of the program to a text file, using copy-and-paste.

Save that text file, using any filename you wish. Then proceed with steps 4-6

above.

Your data should appear in your spreadsheet, and can be manipulated as in any

spreadsheet.

Copy a few lines of the data from your spreadsheet below:

1 2.597 2.597

2 5.52 2.923

3 8.752 3.232

#$&*

*#&!

&#This lab submission looks very good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#