rubber band calibration

Your 'rubber band calibration' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** Your initial comment (if any): **

** first line ruler markings, distance in actual cm between ends, how obtained: **

4.0, 11.5

7.50 cm

The number in the second line was just obtained by finding the distance from the two points in the first line.

** The basis for your uncertainty estimate: **

Measuring to the 0.01 cm mark makes the measurement more precise and accurate. In the above box 7.50 cm can be +0.01 or -0.01 of the 7.50 cm mark.

** Positions of the ends of each rubber band, actual lengths of each when the chain supports 1 domino: **

1.0, 12.6

1.0, 14.2

1.0, 12.8

1.0, 13.0

1.0, 12.1

1.0, 12.8

End

11.60, 13.20, 11.80, 12.00, 11.10, 11.80

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

+/-0.01

** Distances between ends when supporting 2 dominoes **

12.40, 13.30, 12.00, 12.50, 11.00, 12.30

These results were from the weight of two dominoes.

** Lengths when supporting 4, 6, ... dominoes: **

12.00, 13.70, 12.80, 12.60, 10.90, 11.60

4

12.00, 13.70, 11.90, 12.70, 11.70, 11.60

6

13.00, 14.80, 12.80, 15.30, 12.40, 13.50

8

13.10, 15.10, 12.90, 15.80, 13.00, 14.20

10

End

** Your table of force in Newtons vs. length in cm for all rubber bands **

11.60, 13.20, 11.80, 12.00, 11.10, 11.80 ; 2.204, 2.508, 2.242, 2.280, 2.109, 2.242

1

12.40, 13.30, 12.00, 12.50, 11.00, 12.30 ; 2.356, 2.527, 2.280, 2.375, 2.09, 2.337

2

12.00, 13.70, 12.80, 12.60, 10.90, 11.60 ; 2.280, 2.603, 2.432, 2.394, 2.071, 2.204

4

12.00, 13.70, 11.90, 12.70, 11.70, 11.60 ; 2.280, 2.603, 2.261, 2.413, 2.223, 2.204

6

13.00, 14.80, 12.80, 15.30, 12.40, 13.50 ; 2.470, 2.812, 2.432, 2.907, 2.356, 2.565

8

13.10, 15.10, 12.90, 15.80, 13.00, 14.20 ; 2.489, 2.869, 2.451, 3.002, 2.470, 2.698

10

End

** Describe the graph of your first rubber band **

Rubberbands 1-6 all increased at relatively constant rate. My points were extremely close together it was hard to tell the variance in the distance.

End

Each is listed from 1 to 10 dominoes which is what it took for one rubberband to be stretched 33%

Rubber Band 1

L(cm) F(N)

11.6 2.204

12.4 2.356

11.5 2.185

12 2.28

13 2.47

12 2.28

12.9 2.451

13 2.47

13.3 2.527

13.1 2.489

Rubberband 2

L(cm) F(N)

13.2 2.508

13.3 2.527

13.5 2.565

13.7 2.603

14 2.66

13.7 2.603

14.5 2.755

14.8 2.812

15.2 2.888

15.1 2.869

Rubberband 3

L(cm) F(N)

11.8 2.242

12 2.28

11.5 2.185

12.8 2.432

12.2 2.318

11.9 2.261

12.7 2.413

12.8 2.432

13.1 2.489

12.9 2.451

Rubberband 4

L(cm) F(N)

12 2.28

12.5 2.375

12.4 2.356

12.6 2.394

12.5 2.375

12.7 2.13

13.6 2.584

15.3 2.907

15.5 2.945

15.8 3.002

Rubberband 5

L(cm) F(N)

11.1 2.109

11 2.09

12.5 2.375

10.9 2.074

11.4 2.166

11.7 2.223

11.1 2.109

12.4 2.356

11.2 2.128

13 2.47

Rubberband 6

L(cm) F(N)

11.8 2.242

12.3 2.337

11.9 2.261

11.6 2.204

13 2.47

11.6 2.204

13.1 2.489

13.5 2.565

13.8 2.622

14.2 2.698

** The tension force in your first rubber band at length 9.8 cm: **

1.8 N

** The length of your first rubber band when tension is 1.4 N: **

7.8 cm

** The forces at your observed lengths the 1st rubber band, as given by the curve, and the deviations of those curve-predicted lengths from the observed lengths: **

2.200, 2.350, 2.280, 2.280, 2.48

It is roughly the same.

** The lengths predicted for forces .19 N, .38 N, .76 N, 1.14 N, etc. by the curve for your first rubber band; the deviations of your actual observations from these predictions: **

2.204, 4.712, 9.12. 13.68

I multiplied 0.19 by each length so they differ a lot.

** The typical error you estimate when predicting force for a given length from your graphs: **

The values that I reported in the table are more accurate.

Each force was multiplied by 0.19 N and then I would allow a variance of +/- 0.05 N.

** The typical error you estimate when predicting length for a given force from your graphs: **

+/- 0.05

It is easy to be off by 5 hundredths of a centimeter. It is easiest to estimate by 0.05 cm.

** **

3 hours

** **

You appear to have excellent data.

The lengths of the rubber bands are a bit greater than those generally reported. Did you measure these with standard centimeters or with one of the reduced rulers? No problem either way, as long as you specify which was used and use the same rulers for subsequent experiments with rubber bands. If you used one ruler for calibration then later measured distances with another ruler, your graphs would give you incorrect forces.