#$&*
course PHY 202
1/25 1pm
ph2 query 0Most queries in this course will ask you questions about class notes, readings, text problems and experiments. Since the first two assignments have been lab-related, the first two queries are related to the those exercises. While the remaining queries in this course are in question-answer format, the first two will be in the form of open-ended questions. Interpret these questions and answer them as best you can.
Different first-semester courses address the issues of experimental precision, experimental error, reporting of results and analysis in different ways and at different levels. One purpose of these initial lab exercises is to familiarize your instructor with your work and you with the instructor 's expectations.
Comment on your experience with the three lab exercises you encountered in this assignment or in recent assignments.
*********************************************
Question: This question, related to the use of the TIMER program in an experimental situation, is posed in terms of a familiar first-semester system.
Suppose you use a computer timer to time a steel ball 1 inch in diameter rolling down a straight wooden incline about 50 cm long. If the computer timer indicates that on five trials the times of an object down an incline are 2.42sec, 2.56 sec, 2.38 sec, 2.47 sec and 2.31 sec, then to what extent do you think the discrepancies could be explained by each of the following:
· The lack of precision of the TIMER program.
To what extent to you think the discrepancies are explained by this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The lack of precision would cause some uncertainties in the recorded times but should not have a significant impact.
#$&*
· The uncertain precision of human triggering (uncertainty associated with an actual human finger on a computer mouse)
To what extent to you think the discrepancies are explained by this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The uncertainty of human triggering would have a significant effect on the times recorded.
#$&*
· Actual differences in the time required for the object to travel the same distance.
To what extent to you think the discrepancies are explained by this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The ball should travel, theoretically, the same distance the same time every time. This factor should cause little change if any to the times recorded.
#$&*
· Differences in positioning the object prior to release.
To what extent to you think the discrepancies are explained by this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The position would have affected the outcome of the times if the ball was not placed at the same position every time. This difference could show significant changes in times recorded.
#$&*
· Human uncertainty in observing exactly when the object reached the end of the incline.
To what extent to you think the discrepancies are explained by this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
A delay in the human response time to stop the timer at exactly the same point every time is near impossible and will definitely cause fluctuations in the times recorded.
#$&*
*********************************************
Question: How much uncertainty do you think each of the following would actually contribute to the uncertainty in timing a number of trials for the ball-down-an-incline lab?
· The lack of precision of the TIMER program.
To what extent to you think this factor would contribute to the uncertainty?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The precision of a computer timer is in the hundredth of a second which is good. This factor should not contribute much uncertainty in the times.
#$&*
· The uncertain precision of human triggering (uncertainty associated with an actual human finger on a computer mouse)
To what extent to you think this factor would contribute to the uncertainty?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
With a human operating the mouse for the computer, the reaction times for the human to click the mouse at the same point where the ball crosses the measured length every time would be near impossible. This factor of human triggering would cause a significant change in times recorded.
#$&*
· Actual differences in the time required for the object to travel the same distance.
To what extent to you think this factor would contribute to the uncertainty?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
External factors such as friction may cause slight variations in the recorded times, but not much because the friction for each run should be about the same.
#$&*
· Differences in positioning the object prior to release.
To what extent to you think this factor would contribute to the uncertainty?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The differences in position for each run could cause significant variations of recorded times. It would not take much difference in position to alter the data.
#$&*
· Human uncertainty in observing exactly when the object reached the end of the incline.
To what extent to you think this factor would contribute to the uncertainty?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
A human cannot observe when a ball crosses at the same point every time. There will be great variations in the data recorded on this factor.
#$&*
*********************************************
Question: What, if anything, could you do about the uncertainty due to each of the following? Address each specifically.
· The lack of precision of the TIMER program.
What do you think you could do about the uncertainty due to this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Have a better computer system that can use a system to start and stop the timer when the ball crosses a certain point on the incline instead of relying on human triggering.
#$&*
· The uncertain precision of human triggering (uncertainty associated with an actual human finger on a computer mouse)
What do you think you could do about the uncertainty due to this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
About the only solution is to have the system operate by a computer itself using a laser or something like it to determine when the ball passes certain points when traveling down the incline. As long as a human is operating the mouse there will always be variations in the measurements.
#$&*
· Actual differences in the time required for the object to travel the same distance.
What do you think you could do about the uncertainty due to this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Have the smoothest possible surface for the ball to roll down. As well as the smoothest surface on the ball to create the least amount of friction possible when doing the experiment.
#$&*
· Differences in positioning the object prior to release.
What do you think you could do about the uncertainty due to this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Have a back stop set up so you can position the ball against the stop. Positioning the ball against the stop should reduce the amount of uncertainty by not changing the starting position.
#$&*
· Human uncertainty in observing exactly when the object reached the end of the incline.
What do you think you could do about the uncertainty due to this factor?
your answer: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Using a computer system such as a laser to electronically stop the timer when the ball passes a certain point. As long as a human is observing the experiment, the response time will be different nearly every time.
#$&*
*#&!
&#This looks very good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#