You've pretty much got it. My advice is to factor in the manner I've shown below and always get the series into the for a ( r^0 + r^1 + ... + r^n). See my notes. Also send me your access code so I can post this to your page. I'll be sending you a new 7-digit code and copying all your existing stuff to the new location. I was doing some revision for Test # 4 and was going over Geometric series. I was playing around with some numbers and have now confused myself… Example: I was finding the sum of the first (x) number of terms in a series, and in an effort to prove I was doing the right thing I set up the following: 4/9 +16/9 + 64/9 + 256/9 . As you know this is in the form (ar^1+ar^2+ar^3+ar^4) Now the sum of (4/9 +16/9 + 64/9 + 256/9) = 37.77777 However, when I key in a( (1-r^4)/(1-r) ) I get 9.4444 using r=4 and a=(1/9)
You've pretty much got it. My advice is to factor in the manner I've shown below and always get the series into the for a ( r^0 + r^1 + ... + r^n). See my notes. Also send me your access code so I can post this to your page. I'll be sending you a new 7-digit code and copying all your existing stuff to the new location. I was doing some revision for Test # 4 and was going over Geometric series. I was playing around with some numbers and have now confused myself… Example: I was finding the sum of the first (x) number of terms in a series, and in an effort to prove I was doing the right thing I set up the following: 4/9 +16/9 + 64/9 + 256/9 . As you know this is in the form (ar^1+ar^2+ar^3+ar^4) Now the sum of (4/9 +16/9 + 64/9 + 256/9) = 37.77777 However, when I key in a( (1-r^4)/(1-r) ) I get 9.4444 using r=4 and a=(1/9)