asst  6

course phy122

Tough.

assignment #006006.

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

Physics II

07-02-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:25:44

Query Principles and General Physics 17.4: work by field on proton from potential +135 V to potential -55 V.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

-55V - 135 V = -190V

1.6 * 10^*-19C

W=q*dv

W=-190*1.6*10^-19 joules

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:26:27

The change in potential is final potential - initial potential = -55 V - (125 V) = -180 V, so the change in the potential energy of the proton is {}{}-180 V * 1.6 * 10^-19 C ={}-180 J / C * 1.6 * 10^-19 C = -2.9 * 10^-17 J. {}{}In the absence of dissipative forces this is equal and opposite to the change in the KE of the proton; i.e., the proton would gain 2.9 * 10^-17 J of kinetic energy.{}{} Change in potential energy is equal and opposite to the work done by the field on the charge, so the field does 2.9 * 10^-17 J of work on the charge.{}{}Since the charge of the proton is equal in magnitude to that of an electron, he work in electron volts would be 180 volts * charge of 1 electron= 180 eV.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Seems like these are different values than the original question, but my methodolgy was the same.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:34:06

Query Principles and General Physics 17.8: Potential difference required to give He nucleus 65.0 keV of KE.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

KE 65 kev

65*10^3x-1.6*10^-19

the units of this calculation would be J / C * C= J

=-65*1.6*10^-16

=-1.04 * 10^-14 V

this would be in J and would represent the energy gained by a single fundamental charge

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:43:55

65.0 keV is 65.0 * 10^3 eV, or 6.50 * 10^4 eV, of energy. {}{}The charge on a He nucleus is +2 e, where e is the charge on an electron. So assuming no dissipative forces, for every volt of potential difference, the He nuclues would gain 2 eV of kinetic energy.{}{}To gain 6.50 * 10^4 eV of energy the voltage difference would therefore be half of 6.50 * 10^4 voles, or 3.35 * 10^4 volts.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

2 He^4

I get this far:

6.5 * 10^4 * 2 * 1.6 * 10^-19

I dont see 3.35 * 10^4 volts as being half (shouldn't it be 3.25?

it should

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:51:50

Query gen phy text problem 17.18 potential 2.5 * 10^-15 m from proton; PE of two protons at this separation in a nucleus.

What is the electrostatic potential at a distance of 2.5 * 10^-15 meters?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

1.6 * 10^19C

2------------A

2.5*10^-15M

V= K(Q/D)

=9*10^9 (2*1.6*10^-19/2.5*10^10^-15)

= 18/ /* 10^5

7.2*10^5

V=720,000V (720KV)

It's a very good idea to use units throughout your calculation; however your numbers agree with those used in the calculation below, except for the factor 2 on the charge, and should yield volts and then kV

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:53:44

STUDENT SOLUTION: For a part, to determine the electric potential a distance fo 2.5810^-15m away from a proton, I simply used the equation V = k q / r for electric potential for point charge:

q = 1.60*10^-19C=charge on proton

V = kq/r = 9.0*10^9N*m^2/C^2(1.60*10^-19C) / (2.5*10^-15m) = 5.8*10^5V.

Part B was the more difficult portion of the problem. You have to consider a system that consists of two protons 2.5*10^-5m apart.

The work done against the electric field to assemble these charges is W = qV. The potential energy is equal to the work done against the field.

PE=(1.60*10^-19C)(5.8*10^5V)

= 9.2*10^-14 J.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

whoops

W=C*dv

=2*1.6 * 10^-19 * 7.2 * 10^5

=3.2 * 7.2

=23.04 * 10^-14

=2.304*10^-13J

PE=Work Done?

general definition:

the change in the PE of an object is equal and opposite to the work done by the conservative force acting on it

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:53:51

query univ phy 23.58 (24.58 10th edition). Geiger counter: long central wire 145 microns radius, hollow cylinder radius 1.8 cm.

What potential difference between the wire in the cylinder will produce an electric field of 20,000 volts/m at 1.2 cm from the wire?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> Do I answer this?

You aren't required (or expected) to answer this, though you may if you wish. However the university physics problems are from a different text and most are beyond the scope of your course.

When you get to problems labeled for University Physics, you may safely exit the program.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:54:54

** The voltage V_ab is obtained by integrating the electric field from the radius of the central wire to the outer radius.

From this we determine that E = Vab / ln(b/a) * 1/r, where a is the inner radius and b the outer radius.

If E = 20,000 V/m at r = 1.2 cm then

Vab = E * r * ln(b/a) = 20,000 V/m * ln(1.8 cm / .0145 cm) * .012 m = 1157 V. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I assume after the university physics potrtion I no longer have to answer the questions. Is this correct?

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:54:57

Query univ 23.78 (24.72 10th edition). Rain drop radius .65 mm charge -1.2 pC.

What is the potential at the surface of the rain drop?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:55:04

STUDENT RESPONSE FOLLOWED BY SOLUTION: The problem said that V was 0 at d = inifinity, which I understnad to mean that as we approach the raindrop from infinity, the potential differencegrows from 0, to some amount at the surface of the raindrop. Because water molecules are more positive on one side that the other, they tend to align in a certain direction. Since positive charges tend to drift toward negative charge, I would think that the raindrop, with its overall negative charge, has molecules arranged so that their more positive sides are pointing toward the center and negative sides will be alighed along the surface of the raindrop. Probably all wrong. I tried several differnet integrand configuraitons but never found one that gave me an answer in volts.

SOLUTION:

You will have charge Q = -1.2 * 10^-12 C on the surface of a sphere of radius .00065 m.

The field is therefore E = k Q / r^2 = 9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2 * (-1.2 * 10^-12 C) / r^2 = -1.08 * 10^-2 N m^2 / C / r^2.

Integrating the field from infinity to .00065 m we get

(-1.08 * 10^-2 N m^2 / C) / (.00065 m) = -16.6 N m / C = -16.6 V.

If two such drops merge they form a sphere with twice the volume and hence 2^(1/3) times the radius, and twice the charge.

The surface potential is proportional to charge and inversely proportional to volume. So the surface potential will be 2 / 2^(1/3) = 2^(2/3) times as great as before.

The surface potential is therefore 16.6 V * 2^(2/3) = -26.4 volts, approx.. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

"

Good work overall, but I do recommend the use of units at every step of your calculation, and it's important to always actually do the algebra of the units