#$&* course mth 151 014. `query 14
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The statement is equivalent to 'If it's a Marine, it loves boot camp' or equivalent. The statement is not equivalent to 'if it is boot camp, then all Marines love it', which is the converse of the original statement. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary):ok Do you have to use it or can you use they like I did above??????? ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** Since ~p is false then p is true. Since q is false it follows that p -> q is of the form T -> F, which is false. The conditional is false when, and only when, the antecedent is true and the consequent false. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary):ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `qQuery 3.3.36 write in symbols 'If we don't bike, then it does not rain.' YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: ~p->~q If p stands for the activity of biking and q stands for the action of it raining then you would negate each one and make them equivalent. confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** If p stands for 'don't bike' and r for 'it rains' then the statement would be p -> ~r. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): Why wouldn’t you negate both of them??????? And is it okay that I used q instead of r??????? ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `qQuery 3.3.48 q true, p and r false, evaluate (-r U p) -> p YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: I think it would be false because p is said to be false. confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The antecedent (~r U p ) would be true, since ~r true and p false. The consequent p would be false. Since the antecedent is true and the consequent false, the conditional is false. ** MORE DETAILED SOLUTION r is said to be false, so ~r is true p is said to be false Therefore the disjunction (~r U p) would be a disjunction of a true and a false statement. A disjunction is true if at least one of the statements is true, so (~r U p) is true. The conditional (~r U p) -> p therefore consists of an antecedent which is true, and a consequent which is false. By the rules for a conditional, the statement is therefore false. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary):ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating:
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The headings would be p, q ,(p^q), (pUq), (p^q)->(pUq) Row 1 would read T T T T T Row 2 would read T F F T T Row 3 would read F T F T T Row 4 would read F F F F T The common sense of this is that whenever both p and q are true, then the statement 'p or q' must be true. That's what means to say (p ^ q) -> (p U q). The fact that this statement is true is indicated by the last column of the truth table, which has True in every possible case. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary):ok ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: `qQuery 3.3.74 (formerly 3.3.72). This wasn't assigned but it is similar to assigned questions and should be answered: What is the negation of the statement 'if loving you is wrong then I don't want to be right' ? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: If loving you is right then I don’t want to be right confidence rating #$&*: 2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The negation has to have the exact opposite truth values of the original statement. It is difficult and confusing to try to negate a conditional. It is much easier to translate the conditional to a disjunction then negate the disjunction. It is easy to negate the disjunction using deMorgan's Laws. Since p -> q is identical to ~p U q, the negation of p -> q is ~ ( ~p U q), which by de Morgan's Law is ~ ~p ^ ~q, or just p ^ ~q. So the negation would ge 'loving you is wrong AND I want to be right. COMMON ERROR AND NOTE: If loving you is wrong, then I want to be right. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: The negation of a conditional can't be a conditional (a conditional is false in only one case so its negation would have to be false in three cases). ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): I’m not sure if my answer works or not because it means the opposite but the last of it still matches up with the beginning statement. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: