ic_class_091005

course Phy 201

Class 091005There are twenty questions in this document. Most of this just covers what you saw in class, so many of the questions should be short and relatively easy to answer (or at least attempt). However that's still a lot of questions and a lot of ideas to think about, so only one q_a_ will be assigned instead of two.

Questions based on 090930 class

For the 090930 class you were asked to analyze the motion of a pendulum you released from its equilibrium position.

One of the questions was typically not answered, mostly because your instructor didn't clearly designate a place for you to answer it. Since the results obtained by most students were not consistent with their reported data, this question (an a request for one bit of raw data) is repeated below.

`q001. Give the length and pullback of the pendulum for one of your trials, and the distance the pendulum fell to the floor:

**** pullback- 10cm; distance it fell to the floor- 120 cm

data should include pendulum length and horizontal distance during the fall

&&&&

`q002. Using your raw data show how you find the following, for the interval between the event of letting go of the string and the event of the washer's first contact with the floor.

• The time required to fall your observed vertical distance, starting with initial vertical velocity zero and accelerating downward at 980 cm/s^2.

• The displacement of the washer in the horizontal direction.

• The horizontal velocity of the washer.

Give your explanation below:

****

• .25s

• 46, 51,53

• 60.6 cm/s

It takes more than .25 s to fall.

&&&&

Another question that was often not answered concerns the velocity of the pendulum if dropped from rest, through a distance equal to that of its vertical descent.

`q003. How far did you estimate the washer descended, in the vertical direction, as it swung back from release to equilibrium?

**** 20cm

not possible for a 10 cm pullback

&&&&

`q004. Optional problem: If an object dropped .7 cm from rest, accelerating downward at 980 cm/s^2, how fast would it be traveling at the end of the interval? (Hint: you know the initial velocity, the displacement and the acceleration. Use the appropriate equation(s) of motion to answer the question. You should get a result between 30 and 40 cm/s.)

If it isn't completely obvious to you how to get this result, then you need the practice and should show your work:

**** vf = sqr (v0 + 2al) ~ 37cm/s

&&&&

`q005. Now, how fast would the washer be traveling if it dropped from rest through the vertical descent you estimated?

**** 485 cm/s

&&&&

`q006. Note that the pendulum descends as a result of the gravitational force being exerted on it. Its vertical displacement is downward, and gravity exerts a downward force on it, so the gravitational force acting on it does positive work. It follows that its potential energy decreases, which should be accompanied by an increase in its kinetic energy.

Explain this in your own words:

**** the more gravitational force exerted on an object the more kinetic energy is created and the potential energy is depleted

&&&&

Definition of force

Recall the F_net = m a, where the fact that F_net and a are both vector quantities, having magnitude and direction.

Note that vector quantities are written here in boldface; when handwritten they are indicated by an arrow over the symbol. If a vector, say F_net, is written in plain type (in this case as F_net) then this simply refers to the magnitude of the vector, with no regard for its direction.

We can verify that, for a fixed mass, F_net is proportional to a by applying a variety of known net forces to a fixed mass, taking data to determine the acceleration for each trial.

(match with motion of ball down ramp; determine final velocity of ball the projectile)

`q007. If F_net = m a, then if various forces were applied to the same mass, would we expect that greater F_net would be associated with greater or lesser acceleration a? Would a graph of (F_net vs. a) therefore be increasing or decreasing?

**** greater, increasing

&&&&

`q008. If F_net = m a, then what would a graph of (F_net vs. a) look like?

**** sloping in the positive direction

&&&&

We test whether, for a fixed net force, the product m * a is constant. We can do this by applying the same net force to a variety of different masses (e.g., find a way to exert the same net force on an object, and just keep piling on masses).

`q009. Would you expect the same net force to result in greater or lesser acceleration, if the mass was increased?

**** lesser acceleration

&&&&

`q010. What would you therefore expect a graph of a vs. m to look like?

**** a downward slope

&&&&

`q011. If your data allow you to determine m and a for a number of trials, then how could you test whether the product m * a is constant?

**** there would be a constant net-force

&&&&

Definition of work and KE

Recall that substitution of a = F / m into the fourth equation of uniformly accelerated motion results in the work-kinetic energy theorem

F_net `ds = `d(KE), where KE = 1/2 m v^2 is the kinetic energy of mass m moving at velocity v.

F_net and `ds are vector quantities; both have magnitude and direction.

`dKE has no direction, and neither does the product F_net `ds. (Formally this product is what is called a 'dot product', with which you might be familiar. In Phy 121 and 201 we don't use the formality of the dot product, so if you're in one of these courses you won 't to even know the name 'dot product'. However if you do know about the dot product (which should be covered in Mth 164 or equivalent but usually isn't) you may use it. The following paragraph is equivalent to the definition of the dot product).

If F_net and `ds both have the same direction, then their product is positive. If they have opposite directions, then their product is negative. (You don't have to worry about this just yet, but note that if they don't both act along the same line, we use the component of F_net along the line of `ds; this component can be in the same direction as `ds or in the direction opposite `ds, and the product would be positive or negative accordingly).

Definition of impulse and momentum

Recall that substituting a = F / m into the second equation of uniformly accelerated motion results in the impulse-momentum theorem:

F_net * `dt = `d ( m v),

where m v is the momentum of the mass m moving with velocity v.

F_net * `dt is called the impulse of the force acting through time interval `dt.

Note that both impulse and momentum are vector quantities. Both have magnitude and direction. The direction of the impulse is the same as the direction of the force, and the direction of the change in momentum is the same as the direction of the change in velocity. More about this later.

Definition of PE

Start with an example.

If I lift a steel ball from the tabletop to the higher end of a ramp, I do work on it. Then if I release it, gravity does work on it. This work is equal and opposite to the work I did, and of course the ball speeds up. Its kinetic energy therefore increases.

When I lifted the ball I gave it the potential to increase its kinetic energy; when it was released this potential was realized and its kinetic energy increased.

When we lift things we change their position in such a way that the work we have done can in a sense be 'returned' to us (not always conveniently; consider lifting a heavy rock and dropping it on your foot).

Now think about the work done by gravity during this process:

When I lift the object I displace it upward, while gravity exerts a downward force on it.

• The gravitational force is therefore in the direction opposite the displacement, and the work done by the gravitational force ON the object is therefore the product of a positive quantity and a negative quantity. (For example if 'up' is regarded as positive, the displacement is positive and the gravitational force negative; if 'down' is regarded as positive, the displacement is negative and the gravitational force positive).

• Either way the product of force and displacement is negative, and we conclude that gravity did negative work.

We also understand that the potential energy of the object was increased.

We therefore define the change in potential energy (denoted `d(PE) or just `dPE) in this example to be equal and opposite to the work done on the object by gravity.

• Thus if gravity does negative work, `dPE is positive. If gravity does positive work, `dPE is negative.

Other forces, like rubber band tensions, have the potential to 'return' at least some of the work we do on them, and we will soon generalize the definition of `dPE to include such forces.

For now, regard the object being lifted as the 'system' on which work is being done, and be sure you understand every detail of the following statement:

• `dPE is equal and opposite to the work done by gravity ON the system.

The word ON is capitalized for emphasis.

It is natural in some cases to think in terms of the work being done ON a system. In other cases it is more natural to think in terms of the work being done BY the system.

The word 'ON' or 'BY' applies to the word 'system', and the word applied to the word 'system' will be of critical importance in our understanding of energy and energy conservation. It is this word which orients our thinking about the system.

Note that the word 'by' is applied to 'gravity', not to 'system'. In this use it's not capitalized and it's not particularly important.

Forces on an incline

A ball on a steel incline experiences the downward force of gravity, and an elastic response of the incline to that force.

The elastic force acts in the direction perpendicular to the incline (think of the example of the nickel and the bent meter stick).

This elastic force is called the normal force. (note that normal forces are not always elastic; the object on the incline might compress the material of the incline, and the incline therefore exert an equal and opposite compressive force, which also acts perpendicular to the incline; either way we call this a normal force, and because of the nature of elastic and compressive forces they are always exerted perpendicular to the incline).

On a non-horizontal incline, these two forces, the gravitational and normal forces, do not act along the same line. So one cannot balance the other.

• If no other forces are present, then the combination of these two forces will constitute a net force in the direction down the incline. As a result of this force, the ball will accelerate along the incline with acceleration a = F_net / m.

Suppose the incline rises as we move from left to right. We can sketch the force situation. This sketch was presented in class and you should either remember it or have it in your notes. Observations on this sketch:

The normal force acts 'up and to the left'.

The steeper the incline the less the normal force will act 'upward' and the more 'to the left'.

If we sketch the normal force and the gravitational force on a set of x-y axes, in the standard 'vertical-horizontal' orientation, the gravitational force will be represented by an arrow directed along the negative y axis, and the normal force by an arrow directed into the second quadrant.

The gravitational force is already along the y axis. The normal force can be broken into its components along the x and the y axes. This was also presented in class.

The angle of the incline was around 20 degrees. So the normal force would have made an angle of about 20 degrees with the y axis. If you don't have the sketch in your notes, or if you drew it at an angle much different from the 20-degree angle presumed here, make yourself a quick sketch, based on the 20-degree angle. Include the projection lines and components of this force, and give an estimated answer the following:

`q012. What percent of the normal force is its x component? (more specifically: What is the length of the arrow representing the x component of the normal force as a percent of the length of the arrow representing the normal force?)

What percent of the normal force is its y component?

Note that these percents will add up to more than 100%, for the same reason that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line and more specifically because of the Pythagorean Theorem. (the maximum possible sum is a little over 140%)

What are your two estimated percents?

**** 10% is the x component, 90% is the y component

&&&&

It is also possible to 'rotate' the x-y axes so that the x axis is directed along the incline, so that the y axis becomes perpendicular to the incline. This has the advantage that the motion of the ball, being on the incline, is along the x axis, while the normal force is along the y axis.

Sketch the same forces as before, but with the x and y axes rotated counterclockwise 20 degrees, so that the x axis is up the incline and the y axis perpendicular to the incline.

In your sketch the gravitational force, being straight down, should now be in the third quadrant of your rotated coordinate system. This is consistent with the figure presented in class.

The normal force is already along the y axis, so doesn't need projection lines. Sketch the projection lines for the gravitational force, and sketch arrows representing the x and y components of this force.

`q013. Estimate the x and y projections as percents of the gravitational force. Give your results below:

****10% is the x projection, 90% is the y projection

&&&&

`q014. Will the x component of the gravitational force increase, decrease or remain the same as the ball rolls down the incline?

**** remains the same

&&&&

`q015. How does the force situation change when the ball rolls off the end of the incline and begins falling to the floor?

****the gravitational force increases and there is no longer a normal force

&&&&

A sketch was also presented of a pendulum at about a 20 degree angle with vertical. The gravitational force vector was again directed downward, and the tension force was represented by a vector parallel to the pendulum string (as sketched on the board, the tension force was up and to the left).

`q016. Using x and y axes in standard orientation, with the y axis downward, sketch the components of the tension vector for the pendulum, and estimate the x and y components as percents of the tension force:

**** 10% is the x component, 90% is the y component

&&&&

`q017. Make a similar sketch representing the pendulum at a 10 degree angle from vertical, and again estimate the x and y components as percents of the tension force.

What are your new estimates?

**** 5% is the x component, 95% is the y component

&&&&

`q018. Does the x component of the tension force increase or decrease as the pendulum swings back toward equilibrium?

**** decreases

&&&&

`q019. Does the gravitational potential energy of the pendulum increase or decrease as it swings back toward equilibrium? Does the KE of the pendulum increase or decrease?

**** decreases, increases

&&&&

`q020. Does the gravitational potential energy of the ball increase or decrease as it rolls down the incline? Does the KE of the pendulum increase or decrease?

****decreases, increases

&&&&

class 091005

Class 091005

There are twenty questions in this document.  Most of

this just covers what you saw in class, so many of the questions should be short

and relatively easy to answer (or at least attempt).  However that's still

a lot of questions and a lot of ideas to think about, so only one q_a_ will be

assigned instead of two.

Questions based on 090930 class

For the 090930 class you were asked to analyze the motion

of a pendulum you released from its equilibrium position.

One of the questions was typically not answered, mostly

because your instructor didn't clearly designate a place for you to answer it. 

Since the results obtained by most students were not consistent with their

reported data, this question (an a request for one bit of raw data) is repeated

below.

`q001.  Give the length and pullback of the pendulum for one of

your trials, and the distance the pendulum fell to the floor:

****

&&&&

`q002.  Using your raw data show how you find the following, for

the interval between the event of letting go of the string and the event of the

washer's first contact with the floor.

Give your explanation below:

****  You know that the initial vertical velocity is

zero and the acceleration is 980 cm/s^2 downward.   You presumably

measured the vertical displacement.  For example if the pendulum fell 80 cm

to the floor, then choosing downward as positive we would have

vf = +- sqrt( (0 cm/s)^2 + 2 * 980 cm/s^2 * 80 cm) = +-

sqrt(157 000 cm^2 / s^2) = +- 400 cm/s, all calculations very approximate.

For reasons that should at this point be obvious we reject

the negative solutions.

We conclude that the average velocity is 200 cm/s and the

time of fall is `ds_y / vAve_y = 80 cm / (200 cm/s) = .4 s.

 

If the washer traveled, say, 50 cm in the horizontal

direction, then since its horizontal velocity is constant we would obtain vAve_x

using the definition of average velocity, obtaining

vAve_x = 50 cm / (.4 s) = 13 cm/s, approx..

&&&&

Another question that was often not answered concerns the

velocity of the pendulum if dropped from rest, through a distance equal to that

of its vertical descent.

`q003.  How far did you estimate the washer descended, in the

vertical direction, as it swung back from release to equilibrium?

****

You estimate will depend on the length of the pendulum and

the pullback distance, and on your sketch.

For example a pendulum pulled back 30 degrees from

vertical will in fact fall through a distance equal to about 13% of its length,

and any estimate between 10% and 20% of the length would be reasonable for a

hand-drawn sketch.  We will work on this type of estimate in class, and we

will soon learn how to use vectors to determine a precise answer.  (In fact

since you know the length and the pullback you could use the Pythagorean Theorem

in the process of finding an accurate result; however the point here is to

estimate).

For a pendulum of length 30 cm you would likely estimate

the fall to be somewhere between about 3 cm and 6 cm. 

Shorter or longer pullbacks, and shorter or longer

pendulums, would of course result is different estimates.

&&&&

`q004.  Optional problem:  If an object dropped .7 cm from

rest, accelerating downward at 980 cm/s^2, how fast would it be traveling at the

end of the interval?  (Hint:  you know the initial velocity, the

displacement and the acceleration.  Use the appropriate equation(s) of

motion to answer the question.  You should get a result between 30 and 40

cm/s.)

If it isn't completely obvious to you how to get this

result, then you need the practice and should show your work:

****

Analyzing the vertical motion we would use vf = +-

sqrt(v0^2 + 2 a `ds), with v0 = 0, a = 980 cm/s^2 and `ds = .7 cm, obtaining vf

= 35 cm/s (rough estimate).

&&&&

`q005.  Now, how fast would the washer be traveling if it dropped

from rest through the vertical descent you estimated (between release and

equilibrium)?

****

For example if you estimated `ds = 4 cm, you would get vf

= 90 cm/s, approx..

&&&&

`q006.  Note that the pendulum descends as a result of the

gravitational force being exerted on it.  Its vertical displacement is

downward, and gravity exerts a downward force on it, so the gravitational force

acting on it does positive work.  It follows that its potential energy

decreases, which should be accompanied by an increase in its kinetic energy.

Explain this in your own words:

****

&&&&

Definition of force

Recall the F_net = m a, where the fact that

F_net and a are both vector quantities, having magnitude and

direction.

Note that vector quantities are written here in boldface;

when handwritten they are indicated by an arrow over the symbol.   If

a vector, say F_net, is written in plain type (in this case as F_net)

then this simply refers to the magnitude of the vector, with no regard for its

direction.

We can verify that, for a fixed mass, F_net is

proportional to a by applying a variety of known net forces to a fixed mass,

taking data to determine the acceleration for each trial.

(match with motion of ball down ramp; determine final

velocity of ball the projectile)

`q007.  If F_net = m a, then if various forces were

applied to the same mass, would we expect that greater F_net would be associated

with greater or lesser acceleration a?  Would a graph of (F_net vs. a)

therefore be increasing or decreasing?

****

Since m remains constant, and F_net is calculated by

multiplying m * a, the only way F_net could be greater would be for a to

be greater.

&&&&

`q008.  If F_net = m a, then what would a graph of (F_net vs. a)

look like?

****

The graph of y = m x is a straight line through the origin

with slope m.

If we replace y with F_net and x with a, our equation

becomes F_net = m a.

A graph of F_net vs. a would therefore be a straight line

with slope m.

&&&&

We test whether, for a fixed net force, the product m * a

is constant.  We can do this by applying the same net force to a variety of

different masses (e.g., find a way to exert the same net force on an object, and

just keep piling on masses).

`q009.  Would you expect the same net force to result in greater

or lesser acceleration, if the mass was increased?

****

If F_net = m a, then a = F_net / m.

If we divide by a fixed number by a bigger number we get a

smaller result.

So if F_net stays the same and m increases, then dividing

F_net by m will give us a lesser result.

&&&&

`q010.  What would you therefore expect a graph of a vs. m to look

like?

****

Assuming that F_net is positive, a will be positive.

a gets smaller as m gets larger.  So the graph will

be decreasing.

F_net is assumed to be positive, so a cannot be negative

(mass is always positive, so if F_net is positive then a is positive).

So the graph can't go 'below' the horizontal axis. 

If the graph was a straight line, it would have to reach then go below the

horizontal axis.

The only way a graph can decrease without going below the

horizontal axis is to decrease more and more slowly.

So the graph must be a curve, decreasing but more and more

gradually.

If we make m big enough we can make a as small as we like. 

So there is no limit to how close the graph can get to the horizontal axis.

We conclude that the graph will be asymptotic to the

horizontal axis.

&&&&

`q011.  If your data allow you to determine m and a for a number

of trials, then how could you test whether the product m * a is constant?

****

Multiply your values for m and a together.  If you

keep getting about the same result, varying by no more than expected

experimental uncertainty, then your results would be consistent with a constant

product.

&&&&

Definition of work and KE

Recall that substitution of a = F / m into the fourth

equation of uniformly accelerated motion results in the work-kinetic energy

theorem

F_net `ds = `d(KE), where KE = 1/2 m v^2 is the

kinetic energy of mass m moving at velocity v.

F_net and `ds are vector quantities; both

have magnitude and direction. 

`dKE has no direction, and neither does the product

F_net `ds.  (Formally this product is what is called a 'dot product',

with which you might be familiar.  In Phy 121 and 201 we don't use the

formality of the dot product, so if you're in one of these courses you won 't to

even know the name 'dot product'.  However if you do know about the dot

product (which should be covered in Mth 164 or equivalent but usually isn't) you

may use it.  The following paragraph is equivalent to the definition of the

dot product).

If F_net and `ds both have the same

direction, then their product is positive.  If they have opposite

directions, then their product is negative.  (You don't have to worry about

this just yet, but note that if they don't both act along the same line, we use

the component of F_net along the line of `ds; this component can

be in the same direction as `ds or in the direction opposite `ds,

and the product would be positive or negative accordingly).

Definition of impulse and momentum

Recall that substituting a = F / m into the second

equatino of uniformly accelerated motion results in the impulse-momentum

theorem:

F_net * `dt = `d ( m v),

where m v is the momentum of the mass m moving with

velocity v.

F_net * `dt is called the impulse of the force

acting through time interval `dt.

Note that both impulse and momentum are vector quantities. 

Both have magnitude and direction.  The direction of the impulse is the

same as the direction of the force, and the direction of the change in momentum

is the same as the direction of the change in velocity.  More about this

later.

Definition of PE

Start with an example.

If I lift a steel ball from the tabletop to the higher end

of a ramp, I do work on it.  Then if I release it, gravity does work on it. 

This work is equal and opposite to the work I did, and of course the ball speeds

up.  Its kinetic energy therefore increases.

When I lifted the ball I gave it the potential to increase

its kinetic energy; when it was released this potential was realized and its

kinetic energy increased.

When we lift things we change their position in such a way

that the work we have done can in a sense be 'returned' to us (not always

conveniently; consider lifting a heavy rock and dropping it on your foot).

Now think about the work done by gravity during this

process:

When I lift the object I displace it upward, while gravity

exerts a downward force on it. 

We also understand that the potential energy of the object

was increased.

We therefore define the change in potential energy

(denoted `d(PE) or just `dPE) in this example to be equal and opposite to the

work done on the object by gravity. 

Other forces, like rubber band tensions, have the

potential to 'return' at least some of the work we do on them, and we will soon

generalize the definition of `dPE to include such forces.

For now, regard the object being lifted as the 'system' on

which work is being done, and be sure you understand every detail of the

following statement:

The word ON is capitalized for emphasis. 

It is

natural in some cases to think in terms of the work being done ON a system. 

In other cases it is more natural to think in terms of the work being done BY

the system. 

The word 'ON' or 'BY' applies to the word 'system', and the

word applied to the word 'system' will be of critical importance in our

understanding of energy and energy conservation.  It is this word which

orients our thinking about the system.

Note that the word 'by' is applied to 'gravity', not to

'system'.  In this use it's not capitalized and it's not particularly

important. 

Forces on an incline

A ball on a steel incline experiences the downward force

of gravity, and an elastic response of the incline to that force. 

The

elastic force acts in the direction perpendicular to the incline (think of the

example of the nickel and the bent meter stick). 

This elastic force is

called the normal force.  (note that normal forces are not always

elastic; the object on the incline might compress the material of the incline,

and the incline therefore exert an equal and opposite compressive force, which

also acts perpendicular to the incline; either way we call this a normal force,

and because of the nature of elastic and compressive forces they are always

exerted perpendicular to the incline).

On a non-horizontal incline, these two forces, the gravitational and normal forces, do

not act along the same line.  So one cannot balance the other. 

Suppose the incline rises as we move from left to right. 

We can sketch the force situation.  This sketch was

presented in class and you should either remember it or have it in your notes. 

Observations on this sketch:

The normal force acts 'up and to the left'. 

The steeper the incline

the less the normal force will act 'upward' and the more 'to the left'. 

If

we sketch the normal force and the gravitational force on a set of x-y axes, in

the standard 'vertical-horizontal' orientation, the gravitational force will be

represented by an arrow directed along the negative y axis, and the normal force

by an arrow directed into the second quadrant.  

The gravitational force is already along the y axis. 

The normal force can be broken into its components along the x and the y axes. 

This was also presented in class.

The angle of the incline was around 20 degrees.  So

the normal force would have made an angle of about 20 degrees with the y axis. 

If you don't have the sketch in your notes, or if you drew it at an angle much

different from the 20-degree angle presumed here, make yourself a quick sketch,

based on the 20-degree angle.  Include the projection lines and components

of this force, and give an estimated answer the following:

`q012.  What percent of the normal force is its x component? 

(more specifically:  What is the length of the arrow representing the x

component of the normal force as a percent of the length of the arrow

representing the normal force?)

What percent of the normal force is its y component?

Note that these percents will add up to more than 100%,

for the same reason that the shortest distance between two points is a straight

line and more specifically because of the Pythagorean Theorem.  (the

maximum possible sum is a little over 140%)

What are your two estimated percents?

****

For a 20-degree angle, a reasonable estimate would be

around 40% for the horizontal component, and around 90% for the vertical. 

You wouldn't be expected to consider this in making your

estimates at this point, but it's worth noting that if you express the percents

as decimals, then the sum of their squares should be close to 1.  If you

estimated 40% and 90%, then the sum of the squares would be .4^2 + .9^2 = .16 +

.81 = .97, which is reasonably close to 1.

&&&&

It is also possible to 'rotate' the x-y axes so that the x

axis is directed along the incline, so that the y axis becomes perpendicular to

the incline.  This has the advantage that the motion of the ball, being on

the incline, is along the x axis, while the normal force is along the y axis.

Sketch the same forces as before, but with the x and y

axes rotated counterclockwise 20 degrees, so that the x axis is up the incline

and the y axis perpendicular to the incline.

In your sketch the gravitational force, being straight

down, should now be in the third quadrant of your rotated coordinate system. 

This is consistent with the figure presented in class.

The normal force is already along the y axis, so doesn't

need projection lines.  Sketch the projection lines for the gravitational

force, and sketch arrows representing the x and y components of this force.

`q013.  Estimate the x and y projections as percents of the

gravitational force.  Give your results below:

****

Estimates in the neighborhood of 40% and 90% would again

be reasonable.

&&&&

`q014.  Will the x component of the gravitational force increase,

decrease or remain the same as the ball rolls down the incline?

****

As the ball rolls down the incline, the angle between the

incline and the gravitational force vectors does not change, so the x component

of the gravitational force will not change.

&&&&

`q015.  How does the force situation change when the ball rolls

off the end of the incline and begins falling to the floor?

****

When the ball rolls off the end of the ramp the normal

force ceases to act.  The only force on the ball will now be the

gravitational force, acting vertically downward.

Our x-y coordinate system, which was oriented in a

direction dictated by the incline, is no longer relevant, since the ball no

longer travels in the direction of the incline.

&&&&

A sketch was also presented of a pendulum at about a 20

degree angle with vertical.  The gravitational force vector was again

directed downward, and the tension force was represented by a vector parallel to

the pendulum string (as sketched on the board, the tension force was up and to

the left).

q015.  How does the force situation change when the

ball rolls off the end of the incline and begins falling to the floor?

****

&&&&

A sketch was also presented of a pendulum at about a 20

degree angle with vertical.  The gravitational force vector was again

directed downward, and the tension force was represented by a vector parallel to

the pendulum string (as sketched on the board, the tension force was up and to

the left).

`q016.  Using x and y axes in standard orientation, with the y

axis downward, sketch the components of the tension vector for the pendulum (as

sketched in class, pulled back to an angle of 20 deg with vertical), and estimate the x

and y components as percents of the tension force:

****

The tension vector points upward and to the left, into the

second quadrant, making an angle of 20 degrees with the y axis of the specified

coordinate system.

Estimates of in the neighborhood of 40% for the x

component, and 90% for the y component, would be appropriate.

&&&&

`q017.  Make a similar sketch representing the pendulum at a 10

degree angle from vertical, and again estimate the x and y components as

percents of the tension force.

What are your new estimates?

****

At 10 degrees, good estimates would be closer to 20% and

95%.  The accurate values for 10 degrees are in fact a little less than 20%

and a little more than 95%.

&&&&

`q018.  Does the x component of the tension force increase or

decrease as the pendulum swings back toward equilibrium?

****

&&&&

`q019.  Does the gravitational potential energy of the pendulum

increase or decrease as it swings back toward equilibrium?  Does the KE of

the pendulum increase or decrease?

****

As it swings back to equilibrium the component of the

gravitational force in the direction of motion (the component you estimated

above) is also directed toward equilibrium, so gravity acts in the direction of

motion.  The product of the displacement and the gravitational force acting

ON the washer is therefore positive, so gravity does positive work ON the

washer.

Since the change in PE is equal and opposite to the work

done ON the system by the conservative force (in this case the gravitational

force), the PE of the system decreases.

We could also say that since the washer descends as it

swings toward equilibrium, its gravitational PE decreases.

It is clear that the washer speeds up as it approaches

equilibrium, so its KE increases.

&&&&

`q020.  Does the gravitational potential energy of the ball

increase or decrease as it rolls down the incline?  Does the KE of the

pendulum increase or decrease?

****

The PE decreases, for reasons very similar to those in the

given solution to the preceding question.

The KE increases.

&&&&

 

Mostly good answers. Some didn't include enough information about how you got your results, some of which were inconsistent with your data and/or given information.

Compare with the appended document.